Modi

The leaked WhatsApp conversation of popular Indian journalist Arnab Goswami with former Broadcast Audience Research Council (BARC) CEO Partho Dasgupta has exposed the true face and intentions of Prime Minister Narendra Modi. conversation makes it fairly evident that India state-managed the Pulwama incident on 15 February 2019 and the Balakot strikes on 26 February 2019 to secure more votes in the elections scheduled a few months later by flaring up anti-Pakistan sentiment in the Indian public.

Modi’s actions clearly indicate that he has used the “Diversionary Theory of War’’ according to which leaders tend to instigate war in order to divert the attention of the masses from internal domestic issues. It is widely known that Modi favors ultra-nationalism as a tool to revamp his political stature. Instead of showing notable progress in fundamental areas such as economy, employment, healthcare, poverty-reduction and other important issues, he tends to please the Indian public, particularly the Hindu-hardliners by taking aim at Pakistan which is generally very sellable in India.

After taking his seat as the Prime Minister, Narendra Modi manipulated the Indian media in spreading an anti-Pakistan narrative across the whole country with channels instigating hatred towards the country. Pakistan’s Prime Minister, Imran Khan has rightly pointed out that the leaked conversation has revealed an unholy nexus between the Modi government and Indian media. The content of the conversation implies that Goswami knew about the government decisions well ahead of time which suggests that both Balakot and Pulwama were pre-planned and state- managed.

The most appalling aspect of the text exchange was the joy expressed by the Indian journalist over spiking Television Rating Points (TRPs) due to the death of Indian soldiers, which indicates that human lives, even those of their own soldiers have no value in Indian politics.

Another aspect which needs due attention is that Prime Minister Modi did not hesitate to politicize the Armed Forces by getting them involved for his own vested interests and used them in a way that could have borne disastrous results. This, in itself is a stark reflection of his personality and lack of a moral compass.

On the one hand, Indian leadership accuses Pakistan of sponsoring terrorism in India without any concrete proof, while itself masterminding activities that are threatening regional stability and undermining bilateral relations.

Analyzing all aspects of this recent episode, it becomes evident that India is not interested in fostering durable peace in the region. This dangerous style of leadership will have grave implications not only for South Asia, but also India itself. Modi’s actions will ensure that South Asia remains in a perpetual state of conflict. This perilous military adventurism can result in major conflict between the two nuclear-armed countries making the region even more prone to instability. The world must understand that these actions will not only impact India and Pakistan, but also the world at large. Shouldn’t something be done before it is too late?

Another area which requires due attention is that by spreading hatred against Pakistan, Indian leadership is corrupting the minds of Indian youth which will further strain an already-tense relationship between both countries for years to come.

For Pakistan, this development is neither new nor surprising, rather it is a reaffirmation that current Prime Minister of India is willing to disregard regional peace for personal glorification. Throughout his election campaigns in 2014 and 2019, and to date, Modi’s hostility towards Pakistan and his keenness to take reckless actions remains unchanged, and if anything has become far worse.

While the world has witnessed that Pakistan was able to avoid major escalation due to its calculated and responsible response, it should draw important lessons from Modi’s recklessness.

The Pulwama crises may not be the last of its kind rather the Modi regime will always remain active in this regard. More incidents of the same magnitude could be staged again for his personal aggrandizement.

Pakistan should maintain its preparedness in all domains to counter any aggression from the Indian side, while at the same time, remaining pro-active in pursuing diplomatic measures. It needs to highlight that India is acting irresponsibly, and more aggressive actions are expected noting the hawkish actions of the country’s leadership.

Consequently Pakistan should effectively highlight Modi’s heretical leadership style and create more awareness about the severe implications of his actions.

This leaked conversation reaffirms Pakistan’s stance on Indian aggressiveness and also serves as a good example to highlight India’s role as a regional bully under Prime Minister Modi.

Shaza Arif is a Researcher at the Centre for Aerospace & Security Studies (CASS). She can be reached at [email protected]


Share this article

Facebook
Twitter
LinkedIn

Recent Publications

Browse through the list of recent publications.

The US-Israel War on Iran: Objectives, Strategy, and Escalation Management

Zahra Niazi
‘States tend to overestimate themselves or the benefits and swiftness of war, and to underestimate their opponents’ capabilities, intentions, or the costs and duration of war.’ If anything, the 2026 war initiated by the United States and Israel against Iran shall be remembered in the annals of warfare among the most visible manifestations of this dynamic.
The war, immediately preceded by the January mass protests in Iran, did not represent a sudden rupture but rather the continuation of a 47-year-long confrontation and a more intense phase of the June 2025 war.
The US Secretary of War, Pete Hegseth, defined the war’s objectives as being laser-focused: to destroy Iran’s missile capabilities and its security infrastructure, while ensuring that it could never develop nuclear weapons. Beyond these stated objectives, among the priorities on the continuum also lay the objective of regime change, with both President Trump and Prime Minister Netanyahu explicitly calling on the Iranian population to take over the government at the outset of the war.

Read More »

Marka-e-Haq to the Peace Talks: Pakistan’s Middle Power Status

On 7th May 2025, Pakistan’s military forces took the international security community by surprise when it demonstrated operational superiority against its larger belligerent adversary India with its rapid and coordinated response. The Four-Day conflict proved to be a watershed moment for Pakistan, marking its rapid emergence as an important player in the region. In recent years, amidst the ongoing global competition between the United States and China, Islamabad has adopted a position of ’Strategic Balancing,’ where it maintains ties of cooperation with both Beijing and Washington. Deft diplomacy, emphasis on geo-economics, and credible conventional and strategic deterrence have remained the foundational pillars for Pakistan’s ambition as a rising middle power

Read More »

Debunking the S-400 Shield: Lessons from the India-Pakistan Conflict

Air defense has always been a central aspect of warfare. In South Asia, the phenomenon carries immense significance due to compressed reaction times. In this context, one of the most-hyped systems is the Russian-made S-400, touted by New Delhi as a one-stop solution to counter aerial threats from both Pakistan and China.
The 2025 conflict between India and Pakistan marked an important chapter in testing the S-400 technology. The conflict began on May 7, when India attacked what it alleged were terrorist targets in both Pakistani-held Kashmir and Pakistan proper, using drone and missile strikes. The conflict lasted for four days, culminating in a U.S-facilitated ceasefire. However, the brief conflict debunked a lot of the myths regarding the S-400 technology.
First, India claimed that the mobile S-400 would be able to control Pakistan’s airspace. In contrast, Pakistani aircraft continued to operate freely, according to official briefings by the Pakistani military. Although the Pakistan Air Force (PAF) aircraft were in their own airspace, they were still within the air defense range.

Read More »