Modi Election Play

In the evolving theatre of politics, narratives often take centre stage. When skillfully crafted and effectively delivered, they have the potential to manifest profound influence, yielding results that often surpass expectations. In the looming political landscape of India, Prime Minister Narendra Modi has successfully capitalised on the ‘Hindutva’ and ‘anti-Pakistan’ narratives, which have been the linchpin of his previous two election campaigns. These narratives have found remarkable resonance in the Indian populace as manifested by the electoral majority conferred upon him and the domination of the Bharatiya Janata Party (BJP) in the political landscape since its ascendancy to power in 2014. Moreover, Modi has emerged as one of the most popular leaders across India, aggravating the problems of the opposition parties. 

As India gears up for the next General Elections in 2024, the Modi regime will flash several badges to attain a third term in office. These include: abrogation of Articles 370 and 35A; harsh treatment of minorities, particularly Muslims and Christians; and an impasse with Pakistan. Likewise, the Modi administration will seek credit for India’s successful lunar mission, Chandrayaan-3. Most recently, India hosted the G20 summit, which is also being hailed by the BJP government as a remarkable diplomatic win, marking India’s international importance. In fact, during this Summit, the BJP even stroked controversy regarding re-naming India as ‘Bharat’ – a moniker revered by Hindu nationalists. However, these might not be enough for Modi to have the landslide victory he aspires to achieve. 

Until recently, the ruling party exhibited remarkable confidence in winning not only the upcoming elections but most of future Indian elections as well. However, the on-ground realities present several challenges for the regime. While Narendra Modi is trying to project India as a rising power to the Indian public, a large population lives below the poverty line and faces several social issues. Likewise, while it intends to strengthen ties with other countries, its relations with its immediate neighbours, i.e. China and Pakistan, are at their lowest. Likewise, while the economy is seen as a prime priority, inflation has risen to a 15-month high of 7.44% and does not align with the rosy picture painted by the regime.

Exacerbating the situation are the electoral setbacks BJP suffered in Maharashtra, Himachal Pradesh, and particularly in Karnataka where it lost by a considerable margin. Interestingly, these victories have given more confidence to the opposition to defeat their seemingly unbeatable adversary. Consequently, 26 parties in India have formed a joint opposition to contest the elections against BJP under the banner of ‘Indian National Developmental Inclusive Alliance’ (INDIA), setting the stage for a symbolic ‘Modi vs INDIA’ showdown. The alliance faced an initial leadership issue given the disqualification of Rahul Gandhi. However, the Supreme Court has suspended his conviction, making him eligible for leading the alliance and contesting the upcoming elections. Via seat adjustment, the alliance aims to attain considerable representation to remove Prime Minister Modi from power or at least weaken him to an extent that BJP would be forced to form a coalition government, in which the alliance could balance his influence and curb his unlimited power. 

Hence, the present regime may not be satisfied with its existing position and might not be convinced to go into the elections in the prevailing situation. In such a scenario, they may feel the need to revive the ‘anti-Pakistan’ narrative once again to sweep the elections safely. The strategy has historically benefitted the Indian leadership just before the elections, as seen after the Mumbai attacks in 2008, the so-called Uri surgical strike in 2016, and Pulwama. Interestingly, prominent political figures like Satya Pal Malik and Mamata Banerjee have also hinted of the Pulwama attack being a staged act.  Resultantly, Modi may be willing to pay a hefty price for his next electoral victory. A similar pre-planned false flag operation may be in the offing right before the elections, most likely in the disputed Jammu & Kashmir region, to boost the political stature of the sitting Prime Minister and solidify his foothold by instilling a wave of nationalism.

Just as the green screens with fancy slogans were spread around Delhi ahead of the G20 Summit to hide the slums of the city and the prevailing poverty of the masses from the international audience, an anti-Pakistan adventure may be orchestrated to hide the inefficiency of the incumbent regime from the voters. In the quest for electoral victory, new ‘normals’ have been institutionalised by Modi regime, particularly with respect to Pakistan. The choice of the Indian voters remains to be seen in a couple of months, nevertheless, the outcome will have a profound impact not only on the immediate political landscape but also on the regional trajectory for years to come. 

Shaza Arif is a Research Assistant at the Centre for Aerospace & Security Studies (CASS), Islamabad, Pakistan. The article was first published in The News International. She can be reached at: [email protected].

Design Credit: Mysha Dua Salman


Share this article

Facebook
Twitter
LinkedIn

Recent Publications

Browse through the list of recent publications.

Space-Enabled Warfare in the 21st Century: Pathways for Developing States

Space has emerged as a distinct domain of warfare alongside land, sea, air, and cyber. Developed countries like the United States, Russia, and China possess offensive and support capabilities in space. In the shadowed expanse of Low Earth Orbit (LEO), where satellites operate like silent custodians, the 2022 Russian invasion of Ukraine transformed the nature of modern conflict. As Russian troops marched forward, the commercial satellites like Maxar and Planet, which are operated by Western firms, captured high-resolution imagery of Russian troops, providing real-time intelligence to Ukrainian commanders, unlike ever before.

Read More »

The US-Israel War on Iran: Objectives, Strategy, and Escalation Management

Zahra Niazi
‘States tend to overestimate themselves or the benefits and swiftness of war, and to underestimate their opponents’ capabilities, intentions, or the costs and duration of war.’ If anything, the 2026 war initiated by the United States and Israel against Iran shall be remembered in the annals of warfare among the most visible manifestations of this dynamic.
The war, immediately preceded by the January mass protests in Iran, did not represent a sudden rupture but rather the continuation of a 47-year-long confrontation and a more intense phase of the June 2025 war.
The US Secretary of War, Pete Hegseth, defined the war’s objectives as being laser-focused: to destroy Iran’s missile capabilities and its security infrastructure, while ensuring that it could never develop nuclear weapons. Beyond these stated objectives, among the priorities on the continuum also lay the objective of regime change, with both President Trump and Prime Minister Netanyahu explicitly calling on the Iranian population to take over the government at the outset of the war.

Read More »

Marka-e-Haq to the Peace Talks: Pakistan’s Middle Power Status

On 7th May 2025, Pakistan’s military forces took the international security community by surprise when it demonstrated operational superiority against its larger belligerent adversary India with its rapid and coordinated response. The Four-Day conflict proved to be a watershed moment for Pakistan, marking its rapid emergence as an important player in the region. In recent years, amidst the ongoing global competition between the United States and China, Islamabad has adopted a position of ’Strategic Balancing,’ where it maintains ties of cooperation with both Beijing and Washington. Deft diplomacy, emphasis on geo-economics, and credible conventional and strategic deterrence have remained the foundational pillars for Pakistan’s ambition as a rising middle power

Read More »