This paper examines the militarisation of NanoSats and applies the U.S. Space Force’s Competitive Endurance framework to explore their potential military utility for space-based Intelligence, Surveillance, and Reconnaissance (ISR), Earth Observation (EO) and terrestrial tactical responsiveness. While military NanoSats could offer redundancy in case of adversarial attacks, their dual-use ambiguity and proliferation rate challenge traditional deterrence paradigms. This complicates attribution and managing escalation control. Moreover, military utility of NanoSats is constrained compared to larger satellites as commercial off-the-shelf (COTS) components in military NanoSat development risk cyberattacks, radiation vulnerabilities, diminish sensor ability, and decrease operational life. This highlights the fundamental trade-off of military NanoSats: affordability and modularity enable rapid deployment but expose them to adversarial exploitation. The United States military and aerospace firms have spearheaded the militarisation of NanoSats. Meanwhile, the military NanoSat programmes in several other states highlight how they can democratise space power. Military-commercial collaboration in NanoSat development further blurs the boundaries between civilian and military space operations. Therefore, proliferated deployment of military NanoSat constellations risks exacerbating orbital congestion and crisis misperception. This underscores the imperative of reconciling military innovation in NanoSat development with collective space sustainability, urging stakeholders to balance military advantages of NanoSat constellations with the risk of destabilising Earth’s orbit.
Share this article
The West: The History of an Idea
The world is witnessing the collapse of the Western order, if not the emergence of an alternative one. The idea of ‘West’ as against the rest is still at the root of contemporary understanding of world politics. Georgios Varouxakis, a remarkable voice on Modernity and Nationalism, has provided the historical origins and modern connotations attached with the idea of ‘West’. In his book ‘The West: The History of an Idea’, Varouxakis has argued that the West is not an eternal entity, rather it is a modern socio-political construct that emerged in the political philosophy of the early 19th century and evolved with the passage of time. The book provides an in-depth historical analysis of the idea to determine the roots of its modern interpretation.
Space-Enabled Warfare in the 21st Century: Pathways for Developing States
Space has emerged as a distinct domain of warfare alongside land, sea, air, and cyber. Developed countries like the United States, Russia, and China possess offensive and support capabilities in space. In the shadowed expanse of Low Earth Orbit (LEO), where satellites operate like silent custodians, the 2022 Russian invasion of Ukraine transformed the nature of modern conflict. As Russian troops marched forward, the commercial satellites like Maxar and Planet, which are operated by Western firms, captured high-resolution imagery of Russian troops, providing real-time intelligence to Ukrainian commanders, unlike ever before.
The US-Israel War on Iran: Objectives, Strategy, and Escalation Management
Zahra Niazi
‘States tend to overestimate themselves or the benefits and swiftness of war, and to underestimate their opponents’ capabilities, intentions, or the costs and duration of war.’ If anything, the 2026 war initiated by the United States and Israel against Iran shall be remembered in the annals of warfare among the most visible manifestations of this dynamic.
The war, immediately preceded by the January mass protests in Iran, did not represent a sudden rupture but rather the continuation of a 47-year-long confrontation and a more intense phase of the June 2025 war.
The US Secretary of War, Pete Hegseth, defined the war’s objectives as being laser-focused: to destroy Iran’s missile capabilities and its security infrastructure, while ensuring that it could never develop nuclear weapons. Beyond these stated objectives, among the priorities on the continuum also lay the objective of regime change, with both President Trump and Prime Minister Netanyahu explicitly calling on the Iranian population to take over the government at the outset of the war.
