Picture_

President Macron was in the lead in the first round of the French Presidential Elections, securing 27.8% votes, trailed closely by far-right leader Marine Le Pen with 23.1%. Once again, thus, Emmanuel Macron will face Rassemblement National (RN) leader Le Pen in the Presidential runoff on 24th April similar to the 2017 contest. This time, however, the contest is expected to be much closer than the one five years ago. While Macron is expected to win the runoff, his victory could be aided by unlikely supporters from the Left, only to keep Le Pen out of the top slot. Incidentally, Le Pen was not the farthest-right candidate in the recent election. The leader of ‘Reconquete’ (meaning Reconquest) party, Eric Zemmour, with his ultra-right views, and an immensely provocative campaign far exceeded Le Pen’s standing as a right-wing ideologist. Incidentally, the name of his party, ‘Reconquest’ is derived from the historic campaigns of the Christian states, aimed at recapturing Iberian Peninsula from Muslims. The current political reality in France was aptly summed up by Macron when he said, ‘When the far-right, in all its forms, represents that much in France, you can’t consider things are going well’.

France may be in the news for emergence of far-right ideology at the moment, but this phenomena is neither new nor is the country the only one undergoing the same in recent times. At different points in history and especially, since the last century, similar movements have continued to emerge and resurge on both sides of the Atlantic. Ku Klux Klan was one of the earliest groups based on exclusionary politics of white supremacy which came into existence soon after the American Civil War. The group, though, could never become a mainstream political party, but succeeded in attracting millions of followers during its resurgence in the 20th Century. Meanwhile, Europe bore the brunt of far-right, ultra-nationalistic ideology in shape of Nazi and Fascist regimes in Germany and Italy. While these powers were completely defeated in World War II, neo-Nazi and neo-fascist groups in different forms, continue to crop up in the post war period. However, in the wake of huge investment in public welfare policies, and sustained economic growth after the war, the support for far-right parties largely remained muted in Europe and the United States (US).

The situation started to change after 1970s with rising socioeconomic inequality in the Western world and coinciding wave of migrants from developing countries due to economic reasons. These conditions perfectly suited the resurgence of far-right parties in the West, which saw an opportunity to harness the increasing dissatisfaction of the local populace. The situation was further compounded by a void created by the near absence of traditional left-wing ideology, which had hitherto attracted the underprivileged class in earlier times. With the historical division between classic right and left narrowing down to centrist politics, and no meaningful difference between their social, economic, and political agendas, far-right groups shrewdly exploited the situation with their chauvinistic, anti-immigrant and anti-European Union mantra. The anti-immigrant sentiments received further impetus in the wake of one of the largest influx of about one million immigrants in 2015 since World War II.

Immigration policy thus, emerged as one of main issues in European election campaigns. Consequently, right-wing nationalist parties, with authoritarian tendencies, have shown an upsurge in most European countries, with their presence in the parliaments of at least 18 countries in varying numbers. While these parties are already in power in countries like Hungary and Poland, they are catching up fast in others including those with legacies of liberal democracy like Sweden, Denmark and Switzerland. In Sweden, the far-right ‘Sweden Democrats’ which ‘rose from the white supremacist and neo-Nazi fringe’, sprang a surprise by getting 17.6% votes in the last elections, thus becoming the third-largest party in the Parliament. Sweden was also in the news recently due to anti-Muslim rallies and subsequent riots over desecration of the Holy Quran by Rasmus Paludan, a Danish far-right leader. In another important development, the combined far-right group is likely to become the second biggest force in the European Parliament which sits in Brussels. This situation prompted Miguel UrbĂ¡n – a left-wing member of the European Parliament – to remark that ‘this movement shouldn’t be read only in terms of the European Parliament, but from the perspective of a wider-reaching political-cultural counter-revolution.’

To be fair, there have been attempts at the state level to resort to legal measures against hate politics of some of these far-right parties. For instance, France banned the ultra-wing, anti-immigration group ‘Gènèration Identitaire’ on account of promoting ‘discrimination, hate, and violence’. Similarly, Germany put its far-right party Alternative for Germany (AfD) under surveillance for its extremist activities which posed a threat to democracy. However, many experts have termed these measures ‘too little and too late’.

With classic left-wing politics on the decline in most parts of the world, and the underlying socioeconomic issues remaining unresolved, it is no surprise that the far-right politics seem to be making rapid progress everywhere in the world– at least for the time being.

PS: Meanwhile in our East, India too, has been under the tight grip of ultra-right Hindutva nationalistic wave, which is becoming intense and violent each passing day under the BJP rule. The rise of Hindutva and its manifestation is a subject which merits a separate discussion.

Air Marshal Farooq Habib (Retd) is presently working as Senior Director at the Centre for Aerospace & Security Studies (CASS), Islamabad, Pakistan. The article was first published in The Nation. He can be contacted at: [email protected]

Image Source: https://www.dreamstime.com/stock-illustration-far-right-nationalism-europe-set-pinned-military-uniforms-show-locations-across-map-rise-european-states-image71814414


Share this article

Facebook
Twitter
LinkedIn

Recent Publications

Browse through the list of recent publications.

The US-Israel War on Iran: Objectives, Strategy, and Escalation Management

Zahra Niazi
‘States tend to overestimate themselves or the benefits and swiftness of war, and to underestimate their opponents’ capabilities, intentions, or the costs and duration of war.’ If anything, the 2026 war initiated by the United States and Israel against Iran shall be remembered in the annals of warfare among the most visible manifestations of this dynamic.
The war, immediately preceded by the January mass protests in Iran, did not represent a sudden rupture but rather the continuation of a 47-year-long confrontation and a more intense phase of the June 2025 war.
The US Secretary of War, Pete Hegseth, defined the war’s objectives as being laser-focused: to destroy Iran’s missile capabilities and its security infrastructure, while ensuring that it could never develop nuclear weapons. Beyond these stated objectives, among the priorities on the continuum also lay the objective of regime change, with both President Trump and Prime Minister Netanyahu explicitly calling on the Iranian population to take over the government at the outset of the war.

Read More »

Marka-e-Haq to the Peace Talks: Pakistan’s Middle Power Status

On 7th May 2025, Pakistan’s military forces took the international security community by surprise when it demonstrated operational superiority against its larger belligerent adversary India with its rapid and coordinated response. The Four-Day conflict proved to be a watershed moment for Pakistan, marking its rapid emergence as an important player in the region. In recent years, amidst the ongoing global competition between the United States and China, Islamabad has adopted a position of ’Strategic Balancing,’ where it maintains ties of cooperation with both Beijing and Washington. Deft diplomacy, emphasis on geo-economics, and credible conventional and strategic deterrence have remained the foundational pillars for Pakistan’s ambition as a rising middle power

Read More »

Debunking the S-400 Shield: Lessons from the India-Pakistan Conflict

Air defense has always been a central aspect of warfare. In South Asia, the phenomenon carries immense significance due to compressed reaction times. In this context, one of the most-hyped systems is the Russian-made S-400, touted by New Delhi as a one-stop solution to counter aerial threats from both Pakistan and China.
The 2025 conflict between India and Pakistan marked an important chapter in testing the S-400 technology. The conflict began on May 7, when India attacked what it alleged were terrorist targets in both Pakistani-held Kashmir and Pakistan proper, using drone and missile strikes. The conflict lasted for four days, culminating in a U.S-facilitated ceasefire. However, the brief conflict debunked a lot of the myths regarding the S-400 technology.
First, India claimed that the mobile S-400 would be able to control Pakistan’s airspace. In contrast, Pakistani aircraft continued to operate freely, according to official briefings by the Pakistani military. Although the Pakistan Air Force (PAF) aircraft were in their own airspace, they were still within the air defense range.

Read More »