6. Saba Abbasi-Medog Dam-Oped thumbnail-August-2025-Rev1-APP

Medog Dam construction on the Yarlung Tsanpo River in Tibet, China, represents the harnessing of the potential of a geological marvel. The enormous hydraulic head, abundant water volume and immense river discharge make it an unprecedented engineering endeavour. With an estimated cost of $168 billion and an energy capacity of 300 kWh annually, three times that of China’s Three Gorges Dam, this project may redefine hydroelectric engineering as we know it.

There are two important but contrasting aspects to the Medog mega-dam: its technological innovation and the energy trilemma.

The project will employ an unconventional design, using advanced materials and real-time monitoring systems. Unlike a conventional surface-based dam, about 90% of the Medog Dam will be underground, utilising tunnel diversion systems. Self-healing and high-grade advanced materials will be used to withstand extreme pressure and potential rock bursts.

AI-powered real-time monitoring systems and Internet of Things (IoT) sensors will monitor structural safety, assess infrastructure condition, and carry out fault diagnosis. In addition, digital twin modelling systems will be deployed in the project for risk assessment and to support predictive maintenance.

Up until now, coal has been the main source of China’s electricity generation, amounting to 61 percent in 2023. However, due to the rising energy demands of the world’s greatest manufacturer, China needs to generate more energy. Moreover, China’s pledge to reach carbon neutrality also necessitates a massive transition to renewables. The Medog Hydropower Station will facilitate that major shift to renewable hydro energy, given that its closed-loop design will return water to its original river after power generation.

Furthermore, China’s 2025 energy priorities includes the “development and utilisation” of renewables. On January 1 2025, China’s first energy law came into force, aiming to ensure national energy security and promote the transition to green and low-carbon energy goals. The construction of Medog, or the Motou Power Station, is a significant stride towards achieving those goals.

However, a country’s energy system must strike a balance across the energy trilemma: energy security, environmental sustainability, and energy equity. The underground tunnel construction, intended to minimise surface impact and avoid significant changes to the natural landscape, indicates China’s consideration for ecological security. Nevertheless, the materialisation of this dam will not be without environmental and transboundary water challenges.

One of the threats to environmental sustainability is that the dam will potentially alter habitats and ecosystems in the Tibetan Plateau. Downstream agricultural lands will be adversely affected. The reduction in downstream sediment flow will diminish the fertility of floodplains. The floodplains cover 27% of the cultivated area, and any disruption from the dam may undermine livelihoods in a region where agriculture is the main source of food and economic security.

Moreover, the immense scale and geological location of the dam make it susceptible to high seismic activity. Although the design of the dam is planned to be resilient to a magnitude IX earthquake, but its location on a major fault zone, the sheer scale of the structure, and the immense hydraulic pressure can induce major seismic activity or trigger landslides.

On the other hand, the energy equity factor highlights the need for a proportionate distribution of centralised and local benefits. Mostly, the power generated by such energy systems feeds into national grids and industrial zones. The indigenous communities often face displacement, disruption of ecological systems, and restricted access to resources. Furthermore, the risk of limiting local economic benefits and the low likelihood of dam’s primary energy consumption serving resident populations requires attention to ensure project’s energy equity.

In sum, this dam is an energy-security infrastructure built on precision engineering. It will require the integration across numerous domains such as geotechnics, hydraulics, turbine manufacturing, power systems, materials science, construction technology, smart monitoring, environmental protection, and international relations. Its technical difficulty and risk far exceed those of any previous project, such as the Three Gorges Dam, representing humanity’s apex effort to build large energy infrastructure under nature’s most extreme conditions. This project may also enhance China’s hydropower tech exports and global consulting leverage. Therefore, every step forward demands rigorous scientific validation, extensive technological breakthroughs, and international cooperation and coordination.

Saba Abbasi is a Research Assistant at the Centre for Aerospace & Security Studies (CASS), Islamabad, Pakistan. She can be reached at [email protected]


Share this article

Facebook
Twitter
LinkedIn

Recent Publications

Browse through the list of recent publications.

The Cover-up: IAF Narrative of the May 2025 Air Battle

Even after one year since the India-Pakistan May war of 2025, the Indian discourse regarding Operation Sindoor remains uncertain under its pretence of restraint. The Pahalgam attack on 22 April, which killed 26 people, triggered an escalatory spiral. New Delhi quickly accused Pakistan-linked elements, while Islamabad refuted the allegation and demanded an independent investigation. On 7 May, India launched attacks deep inside Pakistan under what it later termed as Operation Sindoor. The political motive was intended to turn the crisis into coercive signalling by shifting the blame onto the enemy and projecting a sense of military superiority.
This episode, however, began to fray immediately as war seldom follows the intended script. Within minutes PAF shot down 7 IAF aircraft including 4 Rafales. On 8 May, Reuters reported that at least two Indian aircraft were shot down by a Pakistani J-10C, while the local government sources reported other aircraft crashes in Indian-occupied Jammu and Kashmir

Read More »

Why the IAF’s Post-Sindoor Spending Surge is a Sign of Panic

After Operation Sindoor, India is spending billions of dollars on new weapons. This is being taken by many people as an indication of military prowess. It is not. This rush to procure weapons is in fact an acknowledgement that the Air Force in India had failed to do what it was meant to do. The costly jets and missiles that India had purchased over the years failed to yield the promised results.

Sindoor was soon followed by India in sealing the gaps which the operation had exposed. It was reported that Indian Air Force (IAF) is looking to speed up its purchases of more than 7 billion USD. This will involve other Rafale fighter jets with India already ordering 26 more Rafales to the Navy in 2024 at an estimated cost of about 3.9 billion USD. India is also seeking long-range standoff missiles, Israeli loitering munitions and increased drone capabilities. Special financial powers of the Indian military were activated to issue emergency procurement orders. The magnitude and rate of these purchases speak volumes.

Indian media and defence analysts have over the years considered the Rafale as a game changer. When India purchased 36 Rafales aircrafts at an approximate cost of 8.7 billion USD, analysts vowed that the aircraft would provide India with air superiority over Pakistan. Operation Sindoor disproved all those allegations. Indian aircraft did not even fly in Pakistani airspace when the fighting started. India solely depended on standoff weapons that were launched at a safe distance. The air defence system of Pakistan, comprising of the HQ-9 surface-to-air missile system and its own fighters, stood its ground.

Read More »

May 2025: Mosaic Warfare and the Myth of Centralised Air Power

Visualise a modern-day Air Force commander sitting in the operations room, miles away from the combat zone, overseeing every friendly and enemy aircraft and all assets involved in the campaign. In a split second, he can task a fighter, reposition a drone, and authorise a strike. In today’s promising technological era, he does not even need an operations room; a laptop on his desktop will suffice. The situation looks promising as it offers efficiency, precision, and control. The term used for such operational control is ‘centralisation’, which has been made possible with advanced networking, integrating space, cyber, surveillance, artificial intelligence, and seamless communication, enabling a single commander to manage an entire campaign from a single node. Centralised command and control, championed by the Western air forces and then adopted by many others, has thus been seen as a pinnacle of modern military power.
The concept of centralisation, enabled by state-of-the-art networking, may seem promising, but it is nothing more than a myth.

Read More »