Kashmir Dispute in the Aftermath of the 2025 Conflict

Title Cover-PER-A4-CC-Kashmir Dispute in the Aftermath of 2025 Conflict-16 feb 2026-HM-Front

The Kashmir dispute remains the central fault line of South Asian security, with periodic crises underscoring its unresolved political, humanitarian, and strategic dimensions. The May 2025 Pakistan-India hostilities once again demonstrated that Kashmir is not a frozen conflict, but a deeply destabilizing issue with direct consequences for regional peace, strategic stability, and human security. Developments since India’s unilateral actions of August 2019, coupled with intensified militarisation and securitisation, have further altered the ground realities in Indian Illegally Occupied Jammu and Kashmir (IIOJK).
The Zoom webinar on ‘Kashmir Dispute in the Aftermath of the 2025 Conflict,’ held by the Centre for Aerospace & Security Studies (CASS) on 4 February 2025, brought together senior practitioners, researchers, and scholars to examine the post-conflict landscape. Moderated by Air Marshal Zahid Mehmood (Retd), Senior Director at CASS, the session explored the human impact of the May 2025 hostilities, evolving Indian strategies in Kashmir, public sentiment within IIOJK, and potential diplomatic and political pathways for Pakistan in the aftermath of the conflict.

The discussion featured research presentations by CASS researchers and a keynote address by Dr Asma Shakir Khawaja, Founding Executive Director of the Centre for International Strategic Studies (CISS), Azad Jammu and Kashmir. Collectively, the conversation highlighted how sustained militarisation, political marginalisation, and governance measures in Kashmir are deepening grievances, while the absence of meaningful conflict resolution mechanisms continues to pose serious risks for South Asian stability. For Pakistan, the deliberations underscored the need to align principled advocacy for Kashmiri self-determination with adaptive diplomatic engagement, sustained international outreach, and greater emphasis on the lived realities of the Kashmiri people.

Print đŸ–¨ PDF đŸ“„


Share this article

Facebook
Twitter
LinkedIn

Recent Publications

Browse through the list of recent publications.

View All Publication

The Cover-up: IAF Narrative of the May 2025 Air Battle

Shafaq Zernab May 7, 2026

Even after one year since the India-Pakistan May war of 2025, the Indian discourse regarding Operation Sindoor remains uncertain under its pretence of restraint. The Pahalgam attack on 22 April, which killed 26 people, triggered an escalatory spiral. New Delhi quickly accused Pakistan-linked elements, while Islamabad refuted the allegation and demanded an independent investigation. On 7 May, India launched attacks deep inside Pakistan under what it later termed as Operation Sindoor. The political motive was intended to turn the crisis into coercive signalling by shifting the blame onto the enemy and projecting a sense of military superiority.
This episode, however, began to fray immediately as war seldom follows the intended script. Within minutes PAF shot down 7 IAF aircraft including 4 Rafales. On 8 May, Reuters reported that at least two Indian aircraft were shot down by a Pakistani J-10C, while the local government sources reported other aircraft crashes in Indian-occupied Jammu and Kashmir

Read More »

Why the IAF’s Post-Sindoor Spending Surge is a Sign of Panic

Muhammad Saad May 7, 2026

After Operation Sindoor, India is spending billions of dollars on new weapons. This is being taken by many people as an indication of military prowess. It is not. This rush to procure weapons is in fact an acknowledgement that the Air Force in India had failed to do what it was meant to do. The costly jets and missiles that India had purchased over the years failed to yield the promised results.

Sindoor was soon followed by India in sealing the gaps which the operation had exposed. It was reported that Indian Air Force (IAF) is looking to speed up its purchases of more than 7 billion USD. This will involve other Rafale fighter jets with India already ordering 26 more Rafales to the Navy in 2024 at an estimated cost of about 3.9 billion USD. India is also seeking long-range standoff missiles, Israeli loitering munitions and increased drone capabilities. Special financial powers of the Indian military were activated to issue emergency procurement orders. The magnitude and rate of these purchases speak volumes.

Indian media and defence analysts have over the years considered the Rafale as a game changer. When India purchased 36 Rafales aircrafts at an approximate cost of 8.7 billion USD, analysts vowed that the aircraft would provide India with air superiority over Pakistan. Operation Sindoor disproved all those allegations. Indian aircraft did not even fly in Pakistani airspace when the fighting started. India solely depended on standoff weapons that were launched at a safe distance. The air defence system of Pakistan, comprising of the HQ-9 surface-to-air missile system and its own fighters, stood its ground.

Read More »

May 2025: Mosaic Warfare and the Myth of Centralised Air Power

Air Vice Marshal Nasser Ul Haq Wyne(Retd) May 5, 2026

Visualise a modern-day Air Force commander sitting in the operations room, miles away from the combat zone, overseeing every friendly and enemy aircraft and all assets involved in the campaign. In a split second, he can task a fighter, reposition a drone, and authorise a strike. In today’s promising technological era, he does not even need an operations room; a laptop on his desktop will suffice. The situation looks promising as it offers efficiency, precision, and control. The term used for such operational control is ‘centralisation’, which has been made possible with advanced networking, integrating space, cyber, surveillance, artificial intelligence, and seamless communication, enabling a single commander to manage an entire campaign from a single node. Centralised command and control, championed by the Western air forces and then adopted by many others, has thus been seen as a pinnacle of modern military power.
The concept of centralisation, enabled by state-of-the-art networking, may seem promising, but it is nothing more than a myth.

Read More »