Ajwa Hijazi-Place for Muslims-25 Mar 2023

Kalyani Devaki Menon, Making Place for Muslims in Contemporary India (Ithaca and London: Cornell University Press, 2022)

Reviewed by Ajwa Hijazi

Kalyani Devaki Menon’s ‘Making Place for Muslims in Contemporary India’ is an insightful gateway into the challenges faced by Indian Muslims to survive in a country treading on the path of exclusionary and majoritarian politics. Working currently, as a Professor of religious study at DePaul University, Chicago, Menon, has previously also written a book titled ‘Everyday Nationalism’ on the religious politics of Hindu rights.

In her latest book, the author, through her fieldwork in Delhi among Muslim communities, shares accounts of various individuals on how Muslims made their place in India by disrupting majoritarian constructions of the country as a Hindu place that places upper-caste Hindus as the normative national subject (p.4).

This book is divided into two parts and five chapters. The first part contains the first two chapters, while the second part consists of three chapters. The first chapter highlights how Muslims are steering through a land of inequality where anti-Muslim prejudices and stereotypes, along with precarious socioeconomic conditions, make them insecure. The second chapter examines how diverse groups of economically underprivileged Muslims, especially women, make ends meet and support their families in a so-called ‘neoliberal’ India. The third chapter explains how Muslim women are questioning local and global islamophobia to ‘make a place’ for themselves in India and the world. The next chapter underscores how Muslims live with each other amidst sectarian divisions while trying to forge a common culture. The last chapter highlights the construction of religious subjectivity of Muslims belonging to various sects and maslaks.

Menon traces the political and cultural transformation of Mughal Shahjahanabad to Old Delhi (British-controlled) and Delhi 6 (emerged after violent transformations of post-colonial India). She emphasises that due to the enduring legacy of violent transformation, Muslims were regarded as suspicious, denied jobs, and constructed as ‘others’ (p.9). She eloquently stresses that the marginalisation of Indian Muslims is not just the result of the rise of the Hindu right, rather it is more broadly inculcated in the political landscape of the state (p.11). While citing personal accounts of various interlocutors of Old Delhi, she opines that the marginal socioeconomic conditions of Muslims are further enabled by Islamophobia, anti-Muslim prejudice, violence, and surveillance (p.15), eventually making Muslims insecure (p.39). She further discusses the Sachar Committee report (2006) which states that Muslims face systematic violence, where their legal citizenship does not guarantee the same rights as the Hindu citizens (p.39). The various accounts presented in the book reflect the prevalent patterns of Hindu chauvinism and anti-Muslim violence that compel Muslims to live in tight-knit Muslim blocks and neighbourhoods (i.e., Old Delhi) where they feel comparatively secure (p.40).

While narrating the precarious economic insecurity faced by Muslims in Old Delhi, the author emphasises the role of Muslim women who, amidst communal violence, are defying gendered stereotypes and ensuring the survival of their families by working and running small businesses (p.71). She also sheds light on the internal issues of Muslim communities residing in Old Delhi, such as the presence of various religious discontents within the communities. However, she asserts that despite the presence of sectarian differences, Muslims from multiple sects agree on one thing: Islam condemns violence (p.127). In stark contrast, Kalyani Devaki Menon links the tremendous upsurge of religious violence in India with the rise of the Hindu right, under the banner of the Bharatiya Janata Party (BJP).

Attempting to find a silver line amidst the melancholic narratives of exclusion, she states that there were also instances of inclusion. The protest against the discriminatory Citizenship Amendment Act (2019) in the Shaheen Bagh was a testament to the inclusionary camaraderie of communities since that protest, led by Muslim women (especially dadis), was also attended by Hindus, Sikhs, and Christians (p.135). Nonetheless, Menon rightly concludes that, ultimately, it is dangerous to claim a place in Modi’s India since the anti-CAA protests were also met with violent retribution (p.162). In the end, she contends that despite the marginalisation, dispositions, fascism, and alienation, Muslims have continued to live bravely and forge a community (p.161).

Kalyani Devaki Menon has tried to present a first-hand account of the everyday struggles of being a Muslim in India through the diverse range of interlocutors of Old Delhi. However, in the second part of the book, she could have emphasised more on the common issues faced by Muslims of all sects and maslaks under the far-right majoritarian rule of BJP (which is hampering their social and political standing in India) instead of giving more space to their internal discord.

All in all, it is an immersive and well-rounded book that reflects how Muslims navigated the violence of Partition, political and economic marginalisation in post-colonial India, and the Hindu-majoritarian and anti-Muslim politics that dominates today’s contemporary India. With elections in India unfolding, this book is a timely read, especially, for students and academics of international relations, minority studies, and religious studies to understand the glaring state of Muslim suppression in India, which has been a constant feature of consecutive BJP governments.

Ajwa Hijazi is a Research Assistant at the Centre for Aerospace & Security Studies (CASS), Islamabad, Pakistan. She can be reached at [email protected].


Share this article

Facebook
Twitter
LinkedIn

Recent Publications

Browse through the list of recent publications.

The Cover-up: IAF Narrative of the May 2025 Air Battle

Even after one year since the India-Pakistan May war of 2025, the Indian discourse regarding Operation Sindoor remains uncertain under its pretence of restraint. The Pahalgam attack on 22 April, which killed 26 people, triggered an escalatory spiral. New Delhi quickly accused Pakistan-linked elements, while Islamabad refuted the allegation and demanded an independent investigation. On 7 May, India launched attacks deep inside Pakistan under what it later termed as Operation Sindoor. The political motive was intended to turn the crisis into coercive signalling by shifting the blame onto the enemy and projecting a sense of military superiority.
This episode, however, began to fray immediately as war seldom follows the intended script. Within minutes PAF shot down 7 IAF aircraft including 4 Rafales. On 8 May, Reuters reported that at least two Indian aircraft were shot down by a Pakistani J-10C, while the local government sources reported other aircraft crashes in Indian-occupied Jammu and Kashmir

Read More »

Why the IAF’s Post-Sindoor Spending Surge is a Sign of Panic

After Operation Sindoor, India is spending billions of dollars on new weapons. This is being taken by many people as an indication of military prowess. It is not. This rush to procure weapons is in fact an acknowledgement that the Air Force in India had failed to do what it was meant to do. The costly jets and missiles that India had purchased over the years failed to yield the promised results.

Sindoor was soon followed by India in sealing the gaps which the operation had exposed. It was reported that Indian Air Force (IAF) is looking to speed up its purchases of more than 7 billion USD. This will involve other Rafale fighter jets with India already ordering 26 more Rafales to the Navy in 2024 at an estimated cost of about 3.9 billion USD. India is also seeking long-range standoff missiles, Israeli loitering munitions and increased drone capabilities. Special financial powers of the Indian military were activated to issue emergency procurement orders. The magnitude and rate of these purchases speak volumes.

Indian media and defence analysts have over the years considered the Rafale as a game changer. When India purchased 36 Rafales aircrafts at an approximate cost of 8.7 billion USD, analysts vowed that the aircraft would provide India with air superiority over Pakistan. Operation Sindoor disproved all those allegations. Indian aircraft did not even fly in Pakistani airspace when the fighting started. India solely depended on standoff weapons that were launched at a safe distance. The air defence system of Pakistan, comprising of the HQ-9 surface-to-air missile system and its own fighters, stood its ground.

Read More »

May 2025: Mosaic Warfare and the Myth of Centralised Air Power

Visualise a modern-day Air Force commander sitting in the operations room, miles away from the combat zone, overseeing every friendly and enemy aircraft and all assets involved in the campaign. In a split second, he can task a fighter, reposition a drone, and authorise a strike. In today’s promising technological era, he does not even need an operations room; a laptop on his desktop will suffice. The situation looks promising as it offers efficiency, precision, and control. The term used for such operational control is ‘centralisation’, which has been made possible with advanced networking, integrating space, cyber, surveillance, artificial intelligence, and seamless communication, enabling a single commander to manage an entire campaign from a single node. Centralised command and control, championed by the Western air forces and then adopted by many others, has thus been seen as a pinnacle of modern military power.
The concept of centralisation, enabled by state-of-the-art networking, may seem promising, but it is nothing more than a myth.

Read More »