Passenger airplane getting ready for flight

An increasing amount of company data from the aviation industry is showing the extent to which global aerospace and aviation is bearing the brunt of the coronavirus pandemic. In a recently issued statement, Airbus has called the pandemic the “gravest crisis the aviation industry has ever experienced.”

Airbus’ worries are being reflected in its commercial aviation segment, where it has witnessed a near 40% drop in recent months. But what is truly frightening is the path to recovery that Airbus envisages. Its statement foresees a recovery of aviation traffic to pre-Covid19 levels only after 2023, and possibly after 2025.

Because of the long path to recovery, Airbus and other aviation giants must now consider structural changes that reflect the decline in air traffic for the foreseeable future. This has translated into announcements of job cuts at staggering levels.

Airbus has announced a cut of 11% of its workforce over the next twelve months, amounting to 15,000 jobs around the world. The cuts are disproportionately in Europe, with 5,000 positions in France, 5000 in Germany, nearly 1000 in Spain, 1,700 in Britain, and another 1,300 positions in the rest of the world. Airbus’ rival, Boeing, had announced a 10% reduction in its workforce through voluntary and involuntary cuts back in April.

Airlines themselves are responding to the pandemic with layoffs as well. Air France has announced 7,500 job cuts by the end of 2022, while Qantas (Australia) has announced 6,000, Delta has 10,000, British Airways 12,000, and Lufthansa has announced a massive 22,000 job cuts. But the largest slasher might be Emirates which, according a Bloomberg report, might slash 30,000 jobs over the next two years.

It should be noted that the aviation industry is an important sector in terms of its economic contribution, not least from an employment perspective, since many of its jobs require technical expertise and are often comparatively higher-wage positions.

Mindful of this, the French government had promised a stimulus of 15 billion Euros for the aviation industry (including Airbus), and 7 billion Euros for Air France itself. The French Economic Minister has urged Airbus to do everything it can to mitigate the announced job cuts. The Ministry has described Airbus’ layoff announcement as “excessive,” but it also acknowledges the recovery can only be gradual.

Yet the second-order effects of the coronavirus pandemic are beginning to mete a severe blow to the sector, especially in terms of the travel restrictions that many jurisdictions are placing. As an example, the EU has just issued a list of countries whose citizens are to be allowed entry in the near future, and the list bars countries such as the United States due to the ongoing contagion.

Given the hardships faced by the aviation industry, even large promised bailouts do not seem sufficient to curtail company decisions to let go of significant portions of their workforce. The question is now whether the downturn will be comparatively short, or prolonged either by a series of shocks and setbacks, or by a sustained and protracted depression. If Airbus is correct to assume that recovery will only occur in the period 2023-25, then one of the most economically-significant industries, global aviation, will add to the litany of cyclical sectors that will be marred by economic depression.

The writer is the Director for Economics and National Affairs at the Centre for Aerospace and Security Studies (CASS). He can be reached at [email protected].


Share this article

Facebook
Twitter
LinkedIn

Recent Publications

Browse through the list of recent publications.

The US-Israel War on Iran: Objectives, Strategy, and Escalation Management

Zahra Niazi
‘States tend to overestimate themselves or the benefits and swiftness of war, and to underestimate their opponents’ capabilities, intentions, or the costs and duration of war.’ If anything, the 2026 war initiated by the United States and Israel against Iran shall be remembered in the annals of warfare among the most visible manifestations of this dynamic.
The war, immediately preceded by the January mass protests in Iran, did not represent a sudden rupture but rather the continuation of a 47-year-long confrontation and a more intense phase of the June 2025 war.
The US Secretary of War, Pete Hegseth, defined the war’s objectives as being laser-focused: to destroy Iran’s missile capabilities and its security infrastructure, while ensuring that it could never develop nuclear weapons. Beyond these stated objectives, among the priorities on the continuum also lay the objective of regime change, with both President Trump and Prime Minister Netanyahu explicitly calling on the Iranian population to take over the government at the outset of the war.

Read More »

Marka-e-Haq to the Peace Talks: Pakistan’s Middle Power Status

On 7th May 2025, Pakistan’s military forces took the international security community by surprise when it demonstrated operational superiority against its larger belligerent adversary India with its rapid and coordinated response. The Four-Day conflict proved to be a watershed moment for Pakistan, marking its rapid emergence as an important player in the region. In recent years, amidst the ongoing global competition between the United States and China, Islamabad has adopted a position of ’Strategic Balancing,’ where it maintains ties of cooperation with both Beijing and Washington. Deft diplomacy, emphasis on geo-economics, and credible conventional and strategic deterrence have remained the foundational pillars for Pakistan’s ambition as a rising middle power

Read More »

Debunking the S-400 Shield: Lessons from the India-Pakistan Conflict

Air defense has always been a central aspect of warfare. In South Asia, the phenomenon carries immense significance due to compressed reaction times. In this context, one of the most-hyped systems is the Russian-made S-400, touted by New Delhi as a one-stop solution to counter aerial threats from both Pakistan and China.
The 2025 conflict between India and Pakistan marked an important chapter in testing the S-400 technology. The conflict began on May 7, when India attacked what it alleged were terrorist targets in both Pakistani-held Kashmir and Pakistan proper, using drone and missile strikes. The conflict lasted for four days, culminating in a U.S-facilitated ceasefire. However, the brief conflict debunked a lot of the myths regarding the S-400 technology.
First, India claimed that the mobile S-400 would be able to control Pakistan’s airspace. In contrast, Pakistani aircraft continued to operate freely, according to official briefings by the Pakistani military. Although the Pakistan Air Force (PAF) aircraft were in their own airspace, they were still within the air defense range.

Read More »