WhatsApp_Image_2021-05-26_at_1.02_.19_PM_

Israel’s atrocities on the Palestinian population reignited this month as Israeli forces carried out aerial strikes over Gaza for 11 consecutive days. The Israeli forces demonstrated the height of insensitivity and irrationality during this period by targeting the Palestinian population, including children, women and elderly, without any discrimination.

While a ceasefire has now been put in place, there are various aspects related to this topic that need to be discussed. These include international law, human rights, religious dimensions, regional alliances, international security and the involvement of major powers. However, more than any of these issues, which although important, are more or less well-known, the sheer indifference of world leaders, especially those of the developed world, is the most concerning and pressing.

It is highly problematic that while citizens in most countries are cognizant of the crimes committed so blatantly by Israeli authorities, majority of the world leaders are silent, save some Muslim countries and their leadership. It is surprising to see that the “civilised” international states have shown lack of concern over such a critical issue. The major powers who claim to be flag-bearers of democracy, champions of human rights and advocates of international law have turned a blind eye to the cruel and vicious Israeli actions. In fact, numerous countries openly took Israel’s side and justified its cruel actions. Some were hesitant to even condemn Israel’s violent tactics.

The pictures of families mourning the death of their loved ones did not wake up world leaders to demand rationale behaviour from Israel. Hundreds of houses have been destroyed and turned into rubble. Approximately 250 people have become victims of Israeli airstrikes. This figure includes 66 children as well. It has been extremely painful to see children screaming and weeping as warplanes fly over their houses. These memories will leave an everlasting trauma on the young minds who are absolutely helpless in front of this aggression.

Ironically, amidst these atrocities, various arms agreements with Israel are still being approved or are in the pipeline. This silence speaks of the double standards of world powers and shows that justice in the international system is selective.

The muted response from international organisations also raises questions about their credibility and bias. The UN Security Council held a meeting with unnecessary delay. The meeting was merely symbolic and did not bear any concrete output or policy guidelines. Likewise, the Organisation of Islamic Council (OIC) failed to generate any consensus over the possible response over Israel’s actions.

What is even more concerning is that not only did most countries remain silent over Israeli oppression, but they also decided to mute those who wanted to speak out against Israel. It has been observed that social media posts and content which condemned Israeli aggression and the plight of the Palestinian was and is constantly being removed from social media platforms, such as Twitter, Facebook and Instagram. Moreover, the content is being labelled as offensive/sensitive in order to forcefully limit its reach.

If the term “rogue state” is analysed, it refers to those states that defy international norms and pose a threat to international peace and security. Scrutinising Israel’s aggression over the Palestinian population, it wouldn’t be wrong to say that its actions are very similar to that of a rogue state. It has disregarded the laws of armed conflicts, human rights, principles of freedom of speech and above all – humanity.

The lack of concern shown by the G-8 countries has made Israel even more confident to continue its belligerent activities and get away with it. It is the years of silence (not just this month) which has allowed the conflict to take the dangerous shape it has taken today. Nobody has been held accountable for these massive crimes against humanity in Palestine. It is the Palestinian children who are paying the biggest price of this silence.

This recent conflict has caused a lot of bloodshed (250 Palestinians dead, including dozens of children, 2000 injured) and is extremely destabilizing for the region. While there is now a ceasefire, it does not imply that the crisis and conflict is over rather it will continue to re-emerge in more dangerous forms. The issue demands some concrete and meaningful actions along with accountability rather than mere statements in order to stop the chaos which has been going on for so many decades.

Shaza Arif is a Researcher at the Centre for Aerospace & Security Studies (CASS). She can be reached at [email protected]

Image Source: Image Source: Alsaafin, Linah. “What is behind Israel’s targeting of prominent buildings in Gaza?”, Al-Jazeera,  19 May 2021, https://www.aljazeera.com/news/2021/5/19/what-is-behind-israels-targeting-of-prominent-buildings-in-gaza


Share this article

Facebook
Twitter
LinkedIn

Recent Publications

Browse through the list of recent publications.

The US-Israel War on Iran: Objectives, Strategy, and Escalation Management

Zahra Niazi
‘States tend to overestimate themselves or the benefits and swiftness of war, and to underestimate their opponents’ capabilities, intentions, or the costs and duration of war.’ If anything, the 2026 war initiated by the United States and Israel against Iran shall be remembered in the annals of warfare among the most visible manifestations of this dynamic.
The war, immediately preceded by the January mass protests in Iran, did not represent a sudden rupture but rather the continuation of a 47-year-long confrontation and a more intense phase of the June 2025 war.
The US Secretary of War, Pete Hegseth, defined the war’s objectives as being laser-focused: to destroy Iran’s missile capabilities and its security infrastructure, while ensuring that it could never develop nuclear weapons. Beyond these stated objectives, among the priorities on the continuum also lay the objective of regime change, with both President Trump and Prime Minister Netanyahu explicitly calling on the Iranian population to take over the government at the outset of the war.

Read More »

Marka-e-Haq to the Peace Talks: Pakistan’s Middle Power Status

On 7th May 2025, Pakistan’s military forces took the international security community by surprise when it demonstrated operational superiority against its larger belligerent adversary India with its rapid and coordinated response. The Four-Day conflict proved to be a watershed moment for Pakistan, marking its rapid emergence as an important player in the region. In recent years, amidst the ongoing global competition between the United States and China, Islamabad has adopted a position of ’Strategic Balancing,’ where it maintains ties of cooperation with both Beijing and Washington. Deft diplomacy, emphasis on geo-economics, and credible conventional and strategic deterrence have remained the foundational pillars for Pakistan’s ambition as a rising middle power

Read More »

Debunking the S-400 Shield: Lessons from the India-Pakistan Conflict

Air defense has always been a central aspect of warfare. In South Asia, the phenomenon carries immense significance due to compressed reaction times. In this context, one of the most-hyped systems is the Russian-made S-400, touted by New Delhi as a one-stop solution to counter aerial threats from both Pakistan and China.
The 2025 conflict between India and Pakistan marked an important chapter in testing the S-400 technology. The conflict began on May 7, when India attacked what it alleged were terrorist targets in both Pakistani-held Kashmir and Pakistan proper, using drone and missile strikes. The conflict lasted for four days, culminating in a U.S-facilitated ceasefire. However, the brief conflict debunked a lot of the myths regarding the S-400 technology.
First, India claimed that the mobile S-400 would be able to control Pakistan’s airspace. In contrast, Pakistani aircraft continued to operate freely, according to official briefings by the Pakistani military. Although the Pakistan Air Force (PAF) aircraft were in their own airspace, they were still within the air defense range.

Read More »