Way Out-AM M. Ashfaque- Article thematic image

Pakistan today is in a situation never witnessed before during the last 75 years.  Pakistani rupee is depreciating at an unprecedented rate. The depreciation witnessed just in the last three and a half months exceeds highest depreciation in any decade of the country’s existence. Increase in petroleum and gas prices has led to increase in electricity rates. These factors are leading to rise in commodity prices pushing inflation above 37%. Food items and medicines are going beyond the common man’s reach, making their life unsustainable.

According to a debate in the National Assembly, Pakistan’s foreign debt stands at USD 126 billion. While the economy requires urgent financial assistance, the IMF Board is in recess and not likely to meet for the next three weeks. Without an immediate lifeline, continued depreciation of Pak rupee will increase inflation and the economy will continue to hemorrhage. The situation is so dire that calls are being made to the US Deputy Secretary of State requesting the US’ help in early release of the IMF package. While such unprecedented moves show our desperation, they also indicate the incumbent government’s inability to negotiate with international bodies and foreign governments.  In another desperate effort to bring in some foreign exchange, the government has decided to sell some of the national assets under an ordinance. However, when the market value of national assets is below the book value, it will prove to be a wrong decision in the long run. Additionally, such desperation will also help foreign forces in exploiting the situation to their advantage.

As if the economic chaos was not enough, many parts of the country, especially Balochistan, Karachi, some parts of Sindh and Punjab have been devastated by floods. In addition to loss of precious life, properties have been destroyed. The floods will also impact agricultural productivity in the coming season. Untimely rains have impacted maize sowing, which will affect overall production.  While people are suffering, the government announced PKR 1.2 billion for the 75th independence day celebrations, though not sufficient, this money could have been utilised to help people distressed by the floods.

As a result of higher energy prices, frequent power shutdowns and continuous depreciation of the rupee resulting in higher prices of raw materials, industries are unable to operate as well as are becoming uncompetitive in the international market. Because of the recently announced ban on imports, Pakistan’s two major automobile producing units have announced reducing their production by 50%. With the shutting down of industrial units, dwindling exports will further add to the country’s economic woes and widen the gap between import and export bills. Shutting down of the industry and sluggishness in the construction business will also add to unemployment and may create law and order situation. Actions by the government suggest that they neither have a roadmap for economic recovery nor political stability.

On the diplomatic front, Pakistan now stands isolated. During the last three and a half months, no head of the state/government has visited Pakistan, nor have there been any fruitful foreign visits by Pakistani leadership. High-level visits to the US in recent weeks also suggest lack of coordination. 

Talks with the IMF have lingered for too long and the final decision is yet not in sight. This uncertainty is leading to speculations and the stock exchange is in freefall while the investors have no trust in the system. Continued currency devaluation-led economic uncertainty and lack of government focus and fake / unverified information floating around on the social media, is resulting in hoarding of commodities and exorbitant prices.

With such negative developments, the political parties are fighting a war for their survival and have forgotten about the plight of the people they represent or the direction in which the country is heading. Federal and provincial governments as well as major political parties are nowhere to be seen in the flood affected areas. The government, instead of focusing on governance, has been working to secure its interests by hastily amending laws and resorting to political engineering to ensure its survival. In addition to mudslinging and using social media platforms to propagate disinformation against opponents, some political parties are also leaving no stone unturned to malign national institutions. While there have been institutional failures, the political parties are endeavouring to exploit the situation to their benefit by pressurising institutions, such as the judiciary.

While Pakistan remains hostage to internal problems, India has made some very swift moves in the economic and military domains. The US has given it waiver from Countering America’s Adversaries Through Sanctions Act (CAATSA) and India can now purchase S-400 missile defence system from Russia without fear of sanctions. India is also importing crude oil from Russia at reduced rates. Taking advantage of the situation, India has also initiated negotiations with the Taliban government in Afghanistan. All these steps are detrimental to Pakistan’s interests.

If the situation continues like this, it will be too difficult to come out of the economic mess as well as political polarisation. Combined effect of these two failures could lead to anarchy, something unacceptable in a nuclear state. In the national interest, political leadership needs to show statesmanship and wisdom and let go their egos. They need to sit together and negotiate a way forward in the national interest, foregoing their party or personal interests. All institutions, of any consequence, must adhere to their defined roles and discharge their responsibilities to the best of their abilities with fairness and without succumbing to any pressures. If need be, they must give up their past practices if those have proven prejudicial to national interest.  Mainstream media and social media must be held accountable for propagating fake news, spread of propaganda and misinformation.

Air Marshal M Ashfaque Arain (Retd) is Advisor to Chief of the Air Staff on CASS Affairs and is also Director of the Emerging Technologies programme at the Centre for Aerospace & Security Studies (CASS), Islamabad, Pakistan.


Share this article

Facebook
Twitter
LinkedIn

Recent Publications

Browse through the list of recent publications.

The Cover-up: IAF Narrative of the May 2025 Air Battle

Even after one year since the India-Pakistan May war of 2025, the Indian discourse regarding Operation Sindoor remains uncertain under its pretence of restraint. The Pahalgam attack on 22 April, which killed 26 people, triggered an escalatory spiral. New Delhi quickly accused Pakistan-linked elements, while Islamabad refuted the allegation and demanded an independent investigation. On 7 May, India launched attacks deep inside Pakistan under what it later termed as Operation Sindoor. The political motive was intended to turn the crisis into coercive signalling by shifting the blame onto the enemy and projecting a sense of military superiority.
This episode, however, began to fray immediately as war seldom follows the intended script. Within minutes PAF shot down 7 IAF aircraft including 4 Rafales. On 8 May, Reuters reported that at least two Indian aircraft were shot down by a Pakistani J-10C, while the local government sources reported other aircraft crashes in Indian-occupied Jammu and Kashmir

Read More »

Why the IAF’s Post-Sindoor Spending Surge is a Sign of Panic

After Operation Sindoor, India is spending billions of dollars on new weapons. This is being taken by many people as an indication of military prowess. It is not. This rush to procure weapons is in fact an acknowledgement that the Air Force in India had failed to do what it was meant to do. The costly jets and missiles that India had purchased over the years failed to yield the promised results.

Sindoor was soon followed by India in sealing the gaps which the operation had exposed. It was reported that Indian Air Force (IAF) is looking to speed up its purchases of more than 7 billion USD. This will involve other Rafale fighter jets with India already ordering 26 more Rafales to the Navy in 2024 at an estimated cost of about 3.9 billion USD. India is also seeking long-range standoff missiles, Israeli loitering munitions and increased drone capabilities. Special financial powers of the Indian military were activated to issue emergency procurement orders. The magnitude and rate of these purchases speak volumes.

Indian media and defence analysts have over the years considered the Rafale as a game changer. When India purchased 36 Rafales aircrafts at an approximate cost of 8.7 billion USD, analysts vowed that the aircraft would provide India with air superiority over Pakistan. Operation Sindoor disproved all those allegations. Indian aircraft did not even fly in Pakistani airspace when the fighting started. India solely depended on standoff weapons that were launched at a safe distance. The air defence system of Pakistan, comprising of the HQ-9 surface-to-air missile system and its own fighters, stood its ground.

Read More »

May 2025: Mosaic Warfare and the Myth of Centralised Air Power

Visualise a modern-day Air Force commander sitting in the operations room, miles away from the combat zone, overseeing every friendly and enemy aircraft and all assets involved in the campaign. In a split second, he can task a fighter, reposition a drone, and authorise a strike. In today’s promising technological era, he does not even need an operations room; a laptop on his desktop will suffice. The situation looks promising as it offers efficiency, precision, and control. The term used for such operational control is ‘centralisation’, which has been made possible with advanced networking, integrating space, cyber, surveillance, artificial intelligence, and seamless communication, enabling a single commander to manage an entire campaign from a single node. Centralised command and control, championed by the Western air forces and then adopted by many others, has thus been seen as a pinnacle of modern military power.
The concept of centralisation, enabled by state-of-the-art networking, may seem promising, but it is nothing more than a myth.

Read More »