cyber_security_in_pakistan_1200x630-1068x561

The authors highlight the vulnerabilities within Pakistan’s cyber-security system. There are cyber laws in place by the government, however, they do not adequately understand the growing sophistication of cyber-attacks.

With the growth and spread of connected digital technologies, cyber threats have become an inescapable reality. According to the World Economic Global Risk Report 2019, massive data fraud and theft were ranked the number four global risk in terms of likelihood, with cyber-attacks at number five.

The same report published in 2020, listed cyber-attacks on critical infrastructures as the fifth top risk. This elucidates the growing potential of the cyber realm where governments, political groups, non-state actors, and corporations can engage in espionage, warfare, and terrorism using this domain.

According to multiple governments as well as privately documented reports, there is an ever-growing threat of cyber-based attacks on crucial infrastructure systems.

Critical infrastructure systems, being the lifeline of the modern world, hold paramount importance for both national and economic security as their reliable and secure operation is crucial for the smooth working of a state. Recognizing it as a global and national security concern, all modern states undertook emergency measures to consolidate their cybersecurity.

The cyber-attack on K-Electric

The cyber-attack on K-Electric, Pakistan’s largest power supply company that took place in late 2020 reinitiated the long-drawn debate on the enactment of an appropriate cybersecurity legislation and governance framework, but to no avail. Cyberspace legislation and governance remain a neglected area in Pakistan.

The ransomware attack launched by Net walker put at risk the data of 2.5 million consumers of the company whose names, addresses, CNIC, and NTN numbers were dumped on the dark web as K-Electric failed to pay the ransom amount of $7 million.

Although K-Electric officials have claimed that the attack has not been harmful and their data remains safe, the consequences of any such future attack can be further catastrophic as Pakistan neither has an effective redressal mechanism to monitor cyber infiltrations nor data protection laws that strengthen digital privacy in the country.

The cyber-attack on K-Electric and numerous other such incidents show weaknesses in Pakistan’s preparedness against cyber threats. According to the Global Security Index 2018, Pakistan was ranked 94 out of a total of 193 countries in terms of cyber preparedness.

The situation has worsened since then and can be attributed to a lack of commitment in legal, technical, organizational, capacity building areas as well as a dearth of interagency/sector cooperation in the cybersecurity domain.

What Pakistan’s cyber laws lack

Different computer and internet-related laws have been enacted by the government to govern and regulate cyberspace in Pakistan.

The key ones include “National IT Policy and Action Plan of 2000”, “Electronic Transaction Ordinance 2002”, “Electronic Crime Ordinance 2004”, “Pakistan Electronic Crime Ordinance 2007”, “Prevention of Electronic Crimes Act (PECA) 2016”, “Data Protection Bill 2018”, and the most recent being “Citizen Protection (Against Online Harm) Rules 2020”.

Even though all these legislations were aimed at addressing internet and computer-related crimes to some extent, none however adequately understands the growing sophistication of cyber-attacks.

While penalizing cybercrimes through effective national legislation is a step in the right direction, Pakistan’s cybercrime laws are just one determinant of a good and secure cybersecurity system.

Unfortunately, Pakistan lags behind in fulfilling some of the major credentials of a good cybersecurity system. According to International Telecommunication Union (ITU), a national cybersecurity strategy is an essential first step in addressing cyber-security challenges.

Apart from the “Prevention of Electronic Crimes Act 2016”, there is no security agency that lays down a national cybersecurity strategy and framework in Pakistan. There is also a lack of coherence in criminal law procedures and the policies to address cybersecurity incidents.

Moreover, there is a dearth of intelligence sharing as well as cooperation frameworks amongst the national institutions which ultimately hampers national cybersecurity efforts. Pakistan also lacks a proactive Computer Emergency Response Team (CERT) at the national level to detect and respond to cyber-threats/attacks in real-time.

Capacity-building in the domain of cybersecurity is another essential component for a robust cyber-security structure, and efforts in this regard are still at a very nascent stage.

A much-needed collaboration

Foregoing suggests Pakistan is extremely vulnerable to cyber-attacks and lacks an appropriate response mechanism.

Pakistan, therefore, needs to address its policy shortcomings vis-à-vis cybersecurity and its preparedness, considering the evolving threats to national security, which have further heightened during the COVID-19 pandemic. Any delay to ramp-up infrastructure related to cyber-security may prove costly.

The need to neutralize any possible cyber incursion is essential and cyber security laws in Pakistan must be made responsive to cope with the emerging cyber threat environment.

A “National Cyber Security Agency” should be formed to ensure collaboration between the government, military, and intelligence stakeholders. A body should be formed to conduct a cyber risk assessment of critical infrastructures and establish protection levels.

Most importantly, there is a dire need to revamp the current digital legislations, particularly PECA from a broader lens of catering for problems relating to cyberspace.

Any indifference, procrastination, or delay in acquiring robust and dynamic cyber defense will be at Pakistan’s own peril.

Amna Tauhidi and Aneeqa Safdar are researchers at the Centre for Aerospace & Security Studies (CASS), Pakistan. The article was first published in Global Village Space(GVS). They can be reached at [email protected]


Share this article

Facebook
Twitter
LinkedIn

Recent Publications

Browse through the list of recent publications.

The US-Israel War on Iran: Objectives, Strategy, and Escalation Management

Zahra Niazi
‘States tend to overestimate themselves or the benefits and swiftness of war, and to underestimate their opponents’ capabilities, intentions, or the costs and duration of war.’ If anything, the 2026 war initiated by the United States and Israel against Iran shall be remembered in the annals of warfare among the most visible manifestations of this dynamic.
The war, immediately preceded by the January mass protests in Iran, did not represent a sudden rupture but rather the continuation of a 47-year-long confrontation and a more intense phase of the June 2025 war.
The US Secretary of War, Pete Hegseth, defined the war’s objectives as being laser-focused: to destroy Iran’s missile capabilities and its security infrastructure, while ensuring that it could never develop nuclear weapons. Beyond these stated objectives, among the priorities on the continuum also lay the objective of regime change, with both President Trump and Prime Minister Netanyahu explicitly calling on the Iranian population to take over the government at the outset of the war.

Read More »

Marka-e-Haq to the Peace Talks: Pakistan’s Middle Power Status

On 7th May 2025, Pakistan’s military forces took the international security community by surprise when it demonstrated operational superiority against its larger belligerent adversary India with its rapid and coordinated response. The Four-Day conflict proved to be a watershed moment for Pakistan, marking its rapid emergence as an important player in the region. In recent years, amidst the ongoing global competition between the United States and China, Islamabad has adopted a position of ’Strategic Balancing,’ where it maintains ties of cooperation with both Beijing and Washington. Deft diplomacy, emphasis on geo-economics, and credible conventional and strategic deterrence have remained the foundational pillars for Pakistan’s ambition as a rising middle power

Read More »

Debunking the S-400 Shield: Lessons from the India-Pakistan Conflict

Air defense has always been a central aspect of warfare. In South Asia, the phenomenon carries immense significance due to compressed reaction times. In this context, one of the most-hyped systems is the Russian-made S-400, touted by New Delhi as a one-stop solution to counter aerial threats from both Pakistan and China.
The 2025 conflict between India and Pakistan marked an important chapter in testing the S-400 technology. The conflict began on May 7, when India attacked what it alleged were terrorist targets in both Pakistani-held Kashmir and Pakistan proper, using drone and missile strikes. The conflict lasted for four days, culminating in a U.S-facilitated ceasefire. However, the brief conflict debunked a lot of the myths regarding the S-400 technology.
First, India claimed that the mobile S-400 would be able to control Pakistan’s airspace. In contrast, Pakistani aircraft continued to operate freely, according to official briefings by the Pakistani military. Although the Pakistan Air Force (PAF) aircraft were in their own airspace, they were still within the air defense range.

Read More »