01. Shah Muhammad-Lab-May-Jus-Oped thumbnail-May-2025-AP (1)

The towering skyscrapers, high-tech gadgets and everyday innovations compel us to wonder: do we truly recognise the blood, sweat, and sacrifice behind our modern way of life? From the agricultural age to the industrial revolution and now the digital era, it is the relentless toil of workers that has shaped the course of human progress. The commemoration of ‘International Workers’ Day’ is more imperative than ever given that workplaces are bracing for significant complexities in the wake of technological advancements and enduring gender bias. It also serves as a timely reminder to engage in thoughtful and compassionate discourse on the persistent challenges of global inequality.

International Workers’ Day traces its origins to the historic struggle for labour rights during what is now known as the Haymarket Massacre. On May 1, 1886, around 300,000 workers across the United States marched to demand an eight-hour workday and dignified working conditions. In the days that followed, a peaceful demonstration in Chicago turned tragic when police opened fire and an unidentified individual detonated a bomb, killing eight civilians and injuring hundreds. Instead of conducting an impartial investigation, the authorities prosecuted and convicted several labour leaders, reflecting the class biases of the era’s justice system. May 1 is thus commemorated globally not only to honour the sacrifices of those who fought for workers’ rights, but also to reflect on ongoing struggles for justice, equity, and fair labour practices today.

Though the world has undergone new phases of progress, its rewards remain concentrated in the hands of a few. According to Oxfam, the richest 1% of the globe has accumulated over twice as much wealth as 6.9 billion people while 3.4 billion people earn a mere USD 5.5 a day. Economic disparities between regions have deepened, as Africa, South Asia, and Latin America remain at the lower end of the global economic spectrum.

Capital, the long dominant factor of production, continues to assert its supremacy over labour. But in today’s high-tech era, technology has also emerged as a new and powerful factor of production, often reinforcing capital’s dominance and enabling more subtle yet pervasive forms of labour exploitation. Unlike the overt extraction of physical labour and raw materials, contemporary technologies commodify human thoughts, behaviours, and emotions, turning them into data streams for commercial profit. This is a manifestation of surveillance capitalism which effectively drives the operations of the Big Tech corporations. Surveillance capitalism has notoriously transformed nearly all digital media users into passive labourers, whose personal data is harvested and commodified as a strategic resource for capital accumulation and power consolidation.

The advent of emerging technologies, especially AI, comes with apprehensions of workplace automation and layoffs of workers across the globe. Around 41% of companies worldwide intend to leverage automation and undercut their workforce. Manual labour is being increasingly replaced by high-skill toil which requires advanced digital literacy. World Economic Forum’s (WEF) Future of Jobs Report 2024 warns that failure to align with high-tech market requirements would lead to mass unemployment across the world. In essence, balancing between technological adoption and workforce retention would be a key challenge for both governments and corporations in the coming years.

Importantly, gender bias is an enduring feature of the economic realm despite the global headways in women’s empowerment. Globally, women own 50% less wealth than men, and their incomes remain, on average, 24% lower than those of their male counterparts. The marginalisation of women is proof of the deeply entrenched patriarchal structures that continue to constrain women’s agency in workplaces. Additionally, women are acutely underrepresented in leadership roles as they constitute a mere 5.4% of CEO positions.

Upholding the rights and dignity of workers would require global as well as national endeavours for social justice. In an increasingly interconnected world, there is a pressing need to establish more platforms, akin to the International Labour Organization, that actively represent and protect workers’ rights across borders. At the national level, workers’ associations should be empowered to serve as dynamic forums for policy dialogue and collective bargaining. It is primarily through collective bargaining that labour can effectively challenge the entrenched dominance of capital. In parallel, governments must strengthen the enforcement of labour laws through independent labour inspections. Violations of minimum wage standards or dignified working conditions should be met with clear punitive measures, including financial penalties and custodial sentences where appropriate.

Automation should be implemented gradually to allow labour markets time to adjust. While 93 million jobs may be lost, 170 million new ones could emerge by 2030. Although the net gain offers hope, preparing for this transition will require coordinated public and private efforts to upskill both current workers and students for an increasingly competitive, tech-driven job market. Women’s empowerment in workplaces would not only require the dismantling of patriarchal structures but also sociocultural initiatives to change the archaic understanding of gender.

1st May should not be just another day of commemoration. It should inspire well-directed policy initiatives and corporate introspection to fundamentally rethink the relationship between labour and capital. Workplaces should be hubs of creativity and joy, not modern ghettos of exploitation and suffocation.

Shah Muhammad is a Research Assistant at the Centre for Aerospace & Security Studies (CASS), Islamabad, Pakistan. He can be reached at:    [email protected]


Share this article

Facebook
Twitter
LinkedIn

Recent Publications

Browse through the list of recent publications.

Two Faces of the Atom: India’s Nuclear Exceptionalism

ew examples capture the inconsistencies of the nuclear world order more starkly than the events of 2 March 2026: as Prime Ministers’ Mark Carney and Narendra Modi signed a landmark 1.9 billion USD uranium supply deal for India’s civil nuclear sector, Iran was subjected to the third day of indiscriminate airstrikes by the US and Israel under the banner of nuclear non-proliferation, despite Iran agreeing to zero stockpiling of enriched uranium just days prior. This event, unfortunately, was not an isolated one, rather it reflects a pattern of nuclear exceptionalism where certain states such as India, continue to be rewarded for non-compliance with international regulations, while others such as Iran, are censured and even subjected to military action based on hypothetical realities.

The latest deal would see Canada sell close to 22 million pounds of uranium concentrate to India over 8 years, starting in 2027, a sale more than ten times the last Canada-India uranium agreement of 2015, which supplied 7 million pounds of concentrate over 5 years.

Read More »

Data Centres as the New Military Targets in Modern Conflicts

The character of warfare has evolved in tandem with the changing nature of military targets. In early March 2026, Iran bypassed traditional military targets and struck the physical part of the digital infrastructure at Amazon Web Services (AWS) data centres in the UAE and Bahrain. Until now data centres had been considered an unassuming target, as they did not house any military equipment or hardware. However, the US-Israel war on Iran, has transformed these billion dollar sites into high-value targets because of their ability to act as server farms on which adversaries’ websites, apps, AI systems and the entire digital infrastructure run.

Data centres are digital ecosystems where the delivery of cloud services depends on the integrity of physical infrastructure. Disruption in any one part of the shared infrastructure does not remain isolated and risks triggering widespread systemic failure. In the case at hand, Amazon operated multiple availability zones within each region in the United Arab Emirates and Bahrain. Iran struck two of the three availability zones in the UAE, while in Bahrain, a zone was damaged by drone debris causing an extended power outage and connectivity problems that further disrupted service across the Gulf.

Read More »

The Sovereign Shield

Pakistan’s defence industry is gearing up from a localised purchase requirement to a globalising high-tech export industry. For long the military-industrial complex of Pakistan had been dominated by military needs of the border security and the costly importation of foreign technology. This tendency, however, seems to be reversing slowly. Pakistan is attempting to edge closer to a model of self-reliance in this regard in terms of tactical security and geoeconomic rebalancing that is spearheaded by the JF-17 Block III, the Super Mushshak, and the unmanned systems. This is very clear in its international defence contracts of between 10 to 13 billion dollars.

But export headlines simply aren’t enough to succeed. The defence ecosystem of Pakistan is built on the basis of a strategic triangle in which the PAF is the challenging end-user and technological enabler of the defence ecosystem, a nascent domestic defence sector with focus on platforms such as the JF-17 and the overall economy that will have to eventually underpin and benefit of the activity. The first two legs have demonstrated great strength. The most challenging one is the economic leg, however. Export spikes can be short lived unless structural reforms are adopted. It is the work to be done by chance, that is to assemble these three factors in a self-sustaining system.

Read More »