01. Shah Muhammad-Lab-May-Jus-Oped thumbnail-May-2025-AP (1)

The towering skyscrapers, high-tech gadgets and everyday innovations compel us to wonder: do we truly recognise the blood, sweat, and sacrifice behind our modern way of life? From the agricultural age to the industrial revolution and now the digital era, it is the relentless toil of workers that has shaped the course of human progress. The commemoration of ‘International Workers’ Day’ is more imperative than ever given that workplaces are bracing for significant complexities in the wake of technological advancements and enduring gender bias. It also serves as a timely reminder to engage in thoughtful and compassionate discourse on the persistent challenges of global inequality.

International Workers’ Day traces its origins to the historic struggle for labour rights during what is now known as the Haymarket Massacre. On May 1, 1886, around 300,000 workers across the United States marched to demand an eight-hour workday and dignified working conditions. In the days that followed, a peaceful demonstration in Chicago turned tragic when police opened fire and an unidentified individual detonated a bomb, killing eight civilians and injuring hundreds. Instead of conducting an impartial investigation, the authorities prosecuted and convicted several labour leaders, reflecting the class biases of the era’s justice system. May 1 is thus commemorated globally not only to honour the sacrifices of those who fought for workers’ rights, but also to reflect on ongoing struggles for justice, equity, and fair labour practices today.

Though the world has undergone new phases of progress, its rewards remain concentrated in the hands of a few. According to Oxfam, the richest 1% of the globe has accumulated over twice as much wealth as 6.9 billion people while 3.4 billion people earn a mere USD 5.5 a day. Economic disparities between regions have deepened, as Africa, South Asia, and Latin America remain at the lower end of the global economic spectrum.

Capital, the long dominant factor of production, continues to assert its supremacy over labour. But in today’s high-tech era, technology has also emerged as a new and powerful factor of production, often reinforcing capital’s dominance and enabling more subtle yet pervasive forms of labour exploitation. Unlike the overt extraction of physical labour and raw materials, contemporary technologies commodify human thoughts, behaviours, and emotions, turning them into data streams for commercial profit. This is a manifestation of surveillance capitalism which effectively drives the operations of the Big Tech corporations. Surveillance capitalism has notoriously transformed nearly all digital media users into passive labourers, whose personal data is harvested and commodified as a strategic resource for capital accumulation and power consolidation.

The advent of emerging technologies, especially AI, comes with apprehensions of workplace automation and layoffs of workers across the globe. Around 41% of companies worldwide intend to leverage automation and undercut their workforce. Manual labour is being increasingly replaced by high-skill toil which requires advanced digital literacy. World Economic Forum’s (WEF) Future of Jobs Report 2024 warns that failure to align with high-tech market requirements would lead to mass unemployment across the world. In essence, balancing between technological adoption and workforce retention would be a key challenge for both governments and corporations in the coming years.

Importantly, gender bias is an enduring feature of the economic realm despite the global headways in women’s empowerment. Globally, women own 50% less wealth than men, and their incomes remain, on average, 24% lower than those of their male counterparts. The marginalisation of women is proof of the deeply entrenched patriarchal structures that continue to constrain women’s agency in workplaces. Additionally, women are acutely underrepresented in leadership roles as they constitute a mere 5.4% of CEO positions.

Upholding the rights and dignity of workers would require global as well as national endeavours for social justice. In an increasingly interconnected world, there is a pressing need to establish more platforms, akin to the International Labour Organization, that actively represent and protect workers’ rights across borders. At the national level, workers’ associations should be empowered to serve as dynamic forums for policy dialogue and collective bargaining. It is primarily through collective bargaining that labour can effectively challenge the entrenched dominance of capital. In parallel, governments must strengthen the enforcement of labour laws through independent labour inspections. Violations of minimum wage standards or dignified working conditions should be met with clear punitive measures, including financial penalties and custodial sentences where appropriate.

Automation should be implemented gradually to allow labour markets time to adjust. While 93 million jobs may be lost, 170 million new ones could emerge by 2030. Although the net gain offers hope, preparing for this transition will require coordinated public and private efforts to upskill both current workers and students for an increasingly competitive, tech-driven job market. Women’s empowerment in workplaces would not only require the dismantling of patriarchal structures but also sociocultural initiatives to change the archaic understanding of gender.

1st May should not be just another day of commemoration. It should inspire well-directed policy initiatives and corporate introspection to fundamentally rethink the relationship between labour and capital. Workplaces should be hubs of creativity and joy, not modern ghettos of exploitation and suffocation.

Shah Muhammad is a Research Assistant at the Centre for Aerospace & Security Studies (CASS), Islamabad, Pakistan. He can be reached at:    [email protected]


Share this article

Facebook
Twitter
LinkedIn

Recent Publications

Browse through the list of recent publications.

The US-Israel War on Iran: Objectives, Strategy, and Escalation Management

Zahra Niazi
‘States tend to overestimate themselves or the benefits and swiftness of war, and to underestimate their opponents’ capabilities, intentions, or the costs and duration of war.’ If anything, the 2026 war initiated by the United States and Israel against Iran shall be remembered in the annals of warfare among the most visible manifestations of this dynamic.
The war, immediately preceded by the January mass protests in Iran, did not represent a sudden rupture but rather the continuation of a 47-year-long confrontation and a more intense phase of the June 2025 war.
The US Secretary of War, Pete Hegseth, defined the war’s objectives as being laser-focused: to destroy Iran’s missile capabilities and its security infrastructure, while ensuring that it could never develop nuclear weapons. Beyond these stated objectives, among the priorities on the continuum also lay the objective of regime change, with both President Trump and Prime Minister Netanyahu explicitly calling on the Iranian population to take over the government at the outset of the war.

Read More »

Marka-e-Haq to the Peace Talks: Pakistan’s Middle Power Status

On 7th May 2025, Pakistan’s military forces took the international security community by surprise when it demonstrated operational superiority against its larger belligerent adversary India with its rapid and coordinated response. The Four-Day conflict proved to be a watershed moment for Pakistan, marking its rapid emergence as an important player in the region. In recent years, amidst the ongoing global competition between the United States and China, Islamabad has adopted a position of ’Strategic Balancing,’ where it maintains ties of cooperation with both Beijing and Washington. Deft diplomacy, emphasis on geo-economics, and credible conventional and strategic deterrence have remained the foundational pillars for Pakistan’s ambition as a rising middle power

Read More »

Debunking the S-400 Shield: Lessons from the India-Pakistan Conflict

Air defense has always been a central aspect of warfare. In South Asia, the phenomenon carries immense significance due to compressed reaction times. In this context, one of the most-hyped systems is the Russian-made S-400, touted by New Delhi as a one-stop solution to counter aerial threats from both Pakistan and China.
The 2025 conflict between India and Pakistan marked an important chapter in testing the S-400 technology. The conflict began on May 7, when India attacked what it alleged were terrorist targets in both Pakistani-held Kashmir and Pakistan proper, using drone and missile strikes. The conflict lasted for four days, culminating in a U.S-facilitated ceasefire. However, the brief conflict debunked a lot of the myths regarding the S-400 technology.
First, India claimed that the mobile S-400 would be able to control Pakistan’s airspace. In contrast, Pakistani aircraft continued to operate freely, according to official briefings by the Pakistani military. Although the Pakistan Air Force (PAF) aircraft were in their own airspace, they were still within the air defense range.

Read More »