08. Shaheer Ahmad-Chi-Mil-Har-Oped thumbnail-April-2025-AP

On 7 May, the Indian military launched a series of strikes from standoff ranges against multiple targets in Punjab and Pakistani-administered Kashmir, called ‘Operation Sindoor’. In response, Pakistan claimed to have retaliated by shooting down five Indian jets, notable among them were top-of-the-line French-manufactured Rafale aircraft.  Later, the acknowledgement by top French and American officials about the downing of Rafale confirmed the first combat kill of the French-made aircraft.  Likewise, the Pakistani military has intercepted 77 kamikaze drones, mainly of Israeli origin. Despite the fog of war, the intense aerial exchange between the regional rivals has underscored the qualitative effectiveness of China’s previously untested inventory.

A cursory look at the crisis shows that Pakistan has mainly relied on Chinese combat planes such as J-10C and JF-17 Thunder aircraft and air defence systems, including HQ-9, to shoot down Indian fighter jets and incoming drones. This reflects a significant presence of Chinese military hardware in Pakistan’s military arsenal. According to Stockholm International Peace Research Institute (SIPRI), China accounts for nearly 82% of Pakistan’s arms imports between 2019-2023. Owing to this robust bilateral defence trade, Pakistan’s claim of shooting down Indian fighter aircraft with Chinese assets remains a trending topic for Chinese policymakers and social media. Reportedly, the shares of AVIC Chengdu Aircraft Co., the manufacturer of J-10C aircraft, saw a sharp hike of 20%, an all-time high in more than two years.

Historically, the conventional disparity between Pakistan and India has prompted the former to counterbalance the latter’s dominance. This realisation became more apparent after the post-Pulwama scenario, when India conducted aerial strikes in Balakot outskirts, followed by a retaliatory riposte by Pakistan, which saw the downing of two Indian fighter jets, the fratricide of a helicopter and a pilot being captured. In aftermath of the episode, both parties poured significant resources into upgrading their military capabilities.

For Pakistan, China appeared as a guaranteed provider of advanced fighter jets, submarines, drones, air defences, radars, missile systems, frigates and satellites. The co-development of JF-17 Thunder, along with the procurement of J-10C Vigorous Dragons, has augmented Pakistan’s operational edge in the region. Concomitantly, Chinese-made HQ-9P, LY-80, FD-2000 and FM-90 constitute Pakistan’s integrated air defence systems, combined with other platforms. Together, these assets form a critical lynchpin of Pakistan’s network-centric warfare capabilities.

In the same context, Pakistan has also benefited from China’s space capabilities by launching satellites from Chinese launch facilities. In 2018, it became the first state to receive access to BeiDou’s military-grade position, navigation and timing data, which increases the precision of missiles, aircraft and ships.

Meanwhile, realising the significance of drones in modern warfare, Pakistan operates numerous Chinese-origin drones such as CH-4 and Wing Loong II, which enhance Pakistan’s intelligence, surveillance and reconnaissance (ISR) capabilities.

This robust partnership has enabled Pakistan to ensure credible deterrence against India’s military advancements. For a long time, the F-16 acquired from the US has been Pakistan’s mainstay. However, the integration of the J-10C and JF-17 Block III with advanced PL-15 BVR is a turning point where Chinese technology is replacing Western weaponry as the operational backbone of Pakistan.

If the current crisis persists, it is likely to see untested Chinese weaponry field-tested, potentially addressing global concerns over their combat viability, such as the use of long-range PL-15 against Indian jets. If confirmed, the development could bolster global perception of China’s military-industrial capabilities. In other words, it would be akin to the Serbia’s downing of the F-117 Nighthawk in terms of optics. Furthermore, Pakistan’s success in downing Indian aircraft demonstrates that China’s military industrial complex has become competitive vis-à-vis its counterparts. In this context, the J-10C and JF-17 are likely to gain market traction reinforcing China’s technological ingenuity and helping dispel doubts about its parity with established defence producers.

The current scenario offers a real-time lens into the performance of Chinese military hardware against Western systems. Although China has expressed ‘unfamiliarity’ about the involvement of Chinese jets, it is cautiously observing the outcome of its weapon systems in actual combat. For a rising military power, which has not been in a major conflict since the Vietnam War, the successful demonstration of its premium military hardware will help it anticipate its performance in future conflicts around the Asia-Pacific.

The offset of hostilities between Pakistan and India has underscored the technological ascendancy of Chinese military hardware. China’s military support to Pakistan makes the latter a key strategic ally in South Asia. It also helps Pakistan remain ahead of the curve in reinforcing deterrence and maintaining operational readiness. Deployment of Chinese combat aircraft demonstrated the battle testing of Chinese weapons in a real-time scenario, enhancing Pakistan’s qualitative position vis-à-vis India.

Shaheer Ahmad is a Research Assistant at the Centre for Aerospace & Security Studies, Islamabad. The article was first published in The Diplomat Magazine. He can be reached at [email protected].


Share this article

Facebook
Twitter
LinkedIn

Recent Publications

Browse through the list of recent publications.

How the Nature of Warfare Affects the AI Optimism

Since the advent of Artificial Intelligence (AI), a pressing question is being asked: Is Clausewitz still relevant? The game-changing potential of AI and the idea of human-machine teaming (centaur systems) have led many to doubt the seemingly unchanged nature of war. Apparently, it has given rise to the belief that AI-powered systems will replace humans (generals) in the command loop. However, this view is detached from the complex nature of warfare, which remains fundamentally a human endeavour guided by violence, chance and friction.

Just like other social institutions, war is generally an interpretivist paradigm rooted in complex human nature. It is a non-linear phenomenon whose conduct and outcomes cannot be determined by analytical predictions or algorithmic patterns. In other words, war usually does not proceed on pre-determined rules of engagement, prescriptive manuals, established patterns and predictive modelling. Instead, it is fought on judgment, adaptation to changing realities, commander’s intuition and paying attention to the unfolding of the unknown. 

Read More »

Two Faces of the Atom: India’s Nuclear Exceptionalism

ew examples capture the inconsistencies of the nuclear world order more starkly than the events of 2 March 2026: as Prime Ministers’ Mark Carney and Narendra Modi signed a landmark 1.9 billion USD uranium supply deal for India’s civil nuclear sector, Iran was subjected to the third day of indiscriminate airstrikes by the US and Israel under the banner of nuclear non-proliferation, despite Iran agreeing to zero stockpiling of enriched uranium just days prior. This event, unfortunately, was not an isolated one, rather it reflects a pattern of nuclear exceptionalism where certain states such as India, continue to be rewarded for non-compliance with international regulations, while others such as Iran, are censured and even subjected to military action based on hypothetical realities.

The latest deal would see Canada sell close to 22 million pounds of uranium concentrate to India over 8 years, starting in 2027, a sale more than ten times the last Canada-India uranium agreement of 2015, which supplied 7 million pounds of concentrate over 5 years.

Read More »

Data Centres as the New Military Targets in Modern Conflicts

The character of warfare has evolved in tandem with the changing nature of military targets. In early March 2026, Iran bypassed traditional military targets and struck the physical part of the digital infrastructure at Amazon Web Services (AWS) data centres in the UAE and Bahrain. Until now data centres had been considered an unassuming target, as they did not house any military equipment or hardware. However, the US-Israel war on Iran, has transformed these billion dollar sites into high-value targets because of their ability to act as server farms on which adversaries’ websites, apps, AI systems and the entire digital infrastructure run.

Data centres are digital ecosystems where the delivery of cloud services depends on the integrity of physical infrastructure. Disruption in any one part of the shared infrastructure does not remain isolated and risks triggering widespread systemic failure. In the case at hand, Amazon operated multiple availability zones within each region in the United Arab Emirates and Bahrain. Iran struck two of the three availability zones in the UAE, while in Bahrain, a zone was damaged by drone debris causing an extended power outage and connectivity problems that further disrupted service across the Gulf.

Read More »