Uswa Khan-Ind-Dro-Pak-Oped thumbnail-May-2024- Op 1

For any state, it is of paramount importance how it guarantees national security. This can be ensured through the use or threat of use of force and also mobilising its defence sector in times of conflict and war. In other words, it revolves around the defence capabilities that allow a state to carry out fundamental functions including ‘preventing, deterring, coercing and countering national security threats’. Here, one of the most crucial components of defence capability is retaining superior military hardware vis Ă  vis the adversary. Similarly, it is in the vital interest of a state to maintain a balance between defence imports and exports to avoid dependency on foreign suppliers. However, given the globalised nature of military technology, it is impractical to achieve hundred percent indigenisation of the defence sector. Nonetheless, the need to promote self-reliance in the defence industry is equally important.

Development of advanced technologies and the revolution in military affairs have added a unique dimension to the conduct of warfare. For example, conventional military equipment has to some extent been replaced by state-of-the-art weapon systems like AI-integrated military systems, Unmanned Combat Aerial Vehicles (UCAVS), etc. Over 95 states are said to have active military drone programmes. Subsequently, use of Lethal Autonomous Weapons (LAWs) and combat drones is a new normal in contemporary warfare.

UCAVS are becoming a standard and a crucial tool in armed conflicts. Their employment is entirely dependent on mission requirements and their specifications i.e., payload, altitude, and range. These are extensively used for surveillance, intelligence gathering and reconnaissance purposes along with identification and precision targeting. One of the biggest benefits of inducting drones in a military fleet is ‘cost-effectiveness’. On average, a drone costs around 3% with limited blast zones making it cheaper and more efficient as compared to a fighter jet worth billions of dollars.

In South Asia, the pace of acquiring and indigenously manufacturing drone technology is increasing especially by Pakistan and India. In 2010, India successfully tested its first indigenously developed UAV, Rustom-I. Whereas, Rustom-II (Tapas 201) another medium-altitude, long-endurance (MALE) was launched in 2016. It can carry a payload of 350 kilogram and is able to perform of multiple-mission capabilities such as electronic intelligence (ELINT), communication intelligence (COMINT) and intelligence gathering. India is also procuring Unmanned Aerial Vehicles (UAVs) from the United States and Israel. Nevertheless, the Indian government is constantly emphasising on indigenisation of defence equipment in line with its policy of self-reliance – ‘Aatmanirbharta’.

Similarly, Pakistan has also been developing its domestic drone programme. In 2009, the National Engineering and Scientific Commission (NESCOM) in collaboration with the Pakistan Air Force (PAF), developed its  first indigenous UCAV ‘Burraq’.  It was capable of carrying a 50-kilogram payload with 200km range. Burraq which carries a Barq air-to-surface laser guided missile is based on the characteristics of the American Predator and Chinese CH-3 Rainbow. It was deployed for counterterrorism purposes to target terrorist hideouts of Tehreek-e-Taliban Pakistan (TTP) in North Waziristan.

Furthermore, a medium altitude and endurance armed tactical UAV, Shahpar I was indigenously developed by Global Industry Defence Solutions (GIDS).  It was inducted in 2013 for ISR and disaster management.  Following Shahpar I’s successful induction,  Shahpar II was developed and launched in 2021 with enhanced combat capabilities. This UCAV carries guided missiles, ISR sensors with Environmental Standard 810F. The latest Shahpar III was launched in 2023. It has advanced features as compared to the previous two models. For example, it has a synthetic aperture radar, extended endurance, enhanced weapon load, and advanced sensors. Additionally, it can carry a payload of 1,650 kilograms.  

Pakistan also possesses tactical UAVs such as UQAB and SATUMA Jasoos II, both of them developed domestically. Besides manufacturing indigenous drones, Pakistan also procured Falco drones from Italy in the past. Currently, Pakistan has acquired 5 Cai Hong 4 (Rainbow 4) from China, and Bayraktar Akinci A category from TĂ¼rkiye. Undoubtedly, the integration of both domestic and foreign UAV technologies has strengthened Pakistan’s UAV fleet.

While having defence suppliers is important, it is pertinent to ensure that the state works towards ensuring self-sufficiency with respect to its defence related equipment in the longer run. In addition to depleting foreign exchange reserves, excessive defence imports can cause macroeconomic burdens. Furthermore, indigenising defence equipment, especially manufacturing counterparts and products opens the door to jobs and skills creation leading to a more stable and prosperous economy. While Pakistan’s efforts to develop domestic UAV technology are commendable, it is equally crucial to prioritise the development of robust anti-drone capabilities. By doing so, Pakistan can proactively neutralise potential future drone incursions, ensuring a balanced approach to both offensive and defensive unmanned aerial strategies.

Uswa Khan is a researcher at the Centre for Aerospace & Security Studies (CASS), Islamabad, Pakistan. She can be reached at [email protected].


Share this article

Facebook
Twitter
LinkedIn

Recent Publications

Browse through the list of recent publications.

The Cover-up: IAF Narrative of the May 2025 Air Battle

Even after one year since the India-Pakistan May war of 2025, the Indian discourse regarding Operation Sindoor remains uncertain under its pretence of restraint. The Pahalgam attack on 22 April, which killed 26 people, triggered an escalatory spiral. New Delhi quickly accused Pakistan-linked elements, while Islamabad refuted the allegation and demanded an independent investigation. On 7 May, India launched attacks deep inside Pakistan under what it later termed as Operation Sindoor. The political motive was intended to turn the crisis into coercive signalling by shifting the blame onto the enemy and projecting a sense of military superiority.
This episode, however, began to fray immediately as war seldom follows the intended script. Within minutes PAF shot down 7 IAF aircraft including 4 Rafales. On 8 May, Reuters reported that at least two Indian aircraft were shot down by a Pakistani J-10C, while the local government sources reported other aircraft crashes in Indian-occupied Jammu and Kashmir

Read More »

Why the IAF’s Post-Sindoor Spending Surge is a Sign of Panic

After Operation Sindoor, India is spending billions of dollars on new weapons. This is being taken by many people as an indication of military prowess. It is not. This rush to procure weapons is in fact an acknowledgement that the Air Force in India had failed to do what it was meant to do. The costly jets and missiles that India had purchased over the years failed to yield the promised results.

Sindoor was soon followed by India in sealing the gaps which the operation had exposed. It was reported that Indian Air Force (IAF) is looking to speed up its purchases of more than 7 billion USD. This will involve other Rafale fighter jets with India already ordering 26 more Rafales to the Navy in 2024 at an estimated cost of about 3.9 billion USD. India is also seeking long-range standoff missiles, Israeli loitering munitions and increased drone capabilities. Special financial powers of the Indian military were activated to issue emergency procurement orders. The magnitude and rate of these purchases speak volumes.

Indian media and defence analysts have over the years considered the Rafale as a game changer. When India purchased 36 Rafales aircrafts at an approximate cost of 8.7 billion USD, analysts vowed that the aircraft would provide India with air superiority over Pakistan. Operation Sindoor disproved all those allegations. Indian aircraft did not even fly in Pakistani airspace when the fighting started. India solely depended on standoff weapons that were launched at a safe distance. The air defence system of Pakistan, comprising of the HQ-9 surface-to-air missile system and its own fighters, stood its ground.

Read More »

May 2025: Mosaic Warfare and the Myth of Centralised Air Power

Visualise a modern-day Air Force commander sitting in the operations room, miles away from the combat zone, overseeing every friendly and enemy aircraft and all assets involved in the campaign. In a split second, he can task a fighter, reposition a drone, and authorise a strike. In today’s promising technological era, he does not even need an operations room; a laptop on his desktop will suffice. The situation looks promising as it offers efficiency, precision, and control. The term used for such operational control is ‘centralisation’, which has been made possible with advanced networking, integrating space, cyber, surveillance, artificial intelligence, and seamless communication, enabling a single commander to manage an entire campaign from a single node. Centralised command and control, championed by the Western air forces and then adopted by many others, has thus been seen as a pinnacle of modern military power.
The concept of centralisation, enabled by state-of-the-art networking, may seem promising, but it is nothing more than a myth.

Read More »