Uswa Khan-Ind-Dro-Pak-Oped thumbnail-May-2024- Op 1

For any state, it is of paramount importance how it guarantees national security. This can be ensured through the use or threat of use of force and also mobilising its defence sector in times of conflict and war. In other words, it revolves around the defence capabilities that allow a state to carry out fundamental functions including ‘preventing, deterring, coercing and countering national security threats’. Here, one of the most crucial components of defence capability is retaining superior military hardware vis Ă  vis the adversary. Similarly, it is in the vital interest of a state to maintain a balance between defence imports and exports to avoid dependency on foreign suppliers. However, given the globalised nature of military technology, it is impractical to achieve hundred percent indigenisation of the defence sector. Nonetheless, the need to promote self-reliance in the defence industry is equally important.

Development of advanced technologies and the revolution in military affairs have added a unique dimension to the conduct of warfare. For example, conventional military equipment has to some extent been replaced by state-of-the-art weapon systems like AI-integrated military systems, Unmanned Combat Aerial Vehicles (UCAVS), etc. Over 95 states are said to have active military drone programmes. Subsequently, use of Lethal Autonomous Weapons (LAWs) and combat drones is a new normal in contemporary warfare.

UCAVS are becoming a standard and a crucial tool in armed conflicts. Their employment is entirely dependent on mission requirements and their specifications i.e., payload, altitude, and range. These are extensively used for surveillance, intelligence gathering and reconnaissance purposes along with identification and precision targeting. One of the biggest benefits of inducting drones in a military fleet is ‘cost-effectiveness’. On average, a drone costs around 3% with limited blast zones making it cheaper and more efficient as compared to a fighter jet worth billions of dollars.

In South Asia, the pace of acquiring and indigenously manufacturing drone technology is increasing especially by Pakistan and India. In 2010, India successfully tested its first indigenously developed UAV, Rustom-I. Whereas, Rustom-II (Tapas 201) another medium-altitude, long-endurance (MALE) was launched in 2016. It can carry a payload of 350 kilogram and is able to perform of multiple-mission capabilities such as electronic intelligence (ELINT), communication intelligence (COMINT) and intelligence gathering. India is also procuring Unmanned Aerial Vehicles (UAVs) from the United States and Israel. Nevertheless, the Indian government is constantly emphasising on indigenisation of defence equipment in line with its policy of self-reliance – ‘Aatmanirbharta’.

Similarly, Pakistan has also been developing its domestic drone programme. In 2009, the National Engineering and Scientific Commission (NESCOM) in collaboration with the Pakistan Air Force (PAF), developed its  first indigenous UCAV ‘Burraq’.  It was capable of carrying a 50-kilogram payload with 200km range. Burraq which carries a Barq air-to-surface laser guided missile is based on the characteristics of the American Predator and Chinese CH-3 Rainbow. It was deployed for counterterrorism purposes to target terrorist hideouts of Tehreek-e-Taliban Pakistan (TTP) in North Waziristan.

Furthermore, a medium altitude and endurance armed tactical UAV, Shahpar I was indigenously developed by Global Industry Defence Solutions (GIDS).  It was inducted in 2013 for ISR and disaster management.  Following Shahpar I’s successful induction,  Shahpar II was developed and launched in 2021 with enhanced combat capabilities. This UCAV carries guided missiles, ISR sensors with Environmental Standard 810F. The latest Shahpar III was launched in 2023. It has advanced features as compared to the previous two models. For example, it has a synthetic aperture radar, extended endurance, enhanced weapon load, and advanced sensors. Additionally, it can carry a payload of 1,650 kilograms.  

Pakistan also possesses tactical UAVs such as UQAB and SATUMA Jasoos II, both of them developed domestically. Besides manufacturing indigenous drones, Pakistan also procured Falco drones from Italy in the past. Currently, Pakistan has acquired 5 Cai Hong 4 (Rainbow 4) from China, and Bayraktar Akinci A category from TĂ¼rkiye. Undoubtedly, the integration of both domestic and foreign UAV technologies has strengthened Pakistan’s UAV fleet.

While having defence suppliers is important, it is pertinent to ensure that the state works towards ensuring self-sufficiency with respect to its defence related equipment in the longer run. In addition to depleting foreign exchange reserves, excessive defence imports can cause macroeconomic burdens. Furthermore, indigenising defence equipment, especially manufacturing counterparts and products opens the door to jobs and skills creation leading to a more stable and prosperous economy. While Pakistan’s efforts to develop domestic UAV technology are commendable, it is equally crucial to prioritise the development of robust anti-drone capabilities. By doing so, Pakistan can proactively neutralise potential future drone incursions, ensuring a balanced approach to both offensive and defensive unmanned aerial strategies.

Uswa Khan is a researcher at the Centre for Aerospace & Security Studies (CASS), Islamabad, Pakistan. She can be reached at [email protected].


Share this article

Facebook
Twitter
LinkedIn

Recent Publications

Browse through the list of recent publications.

The US-Israel War on Iran: Objectives, Strategy, and Escalation Management

Zahra Niazi
‘States tend to overestimate themselves or the benefits and swiftness of war, and to underestimate their opponents’ capabilities, intentions, or the costs and duration of war.’ If anything, the 2026 war initiated by the United States and Israel against Iran shall be remembered in the annals of warfare among the most visible manifestations of this dynamic.
The war, immediately preceded by the January mass protests in Iran, did not represent a sudden rupture but rather the continuation of a 47-year-long confrontation and a more intense phase of the June 2025 war.
The US Secretary of War, Pete Hegseth, defined the war’s objectives as being laser-focused: to destroy Iran’s missile capabilities and its security infrastructure, while ensuring that it could never develop nuclear weapons. Beyond these stated objectives, among the priorities on the continuum also lay the objective of regime change, with both President Trump and Prime Minister Netanyahu explicitly calling on the Iranian population to take over the government at the outset of the war.

Read More »

Marka-e-Haq to the Peace Talks: Pakistan’s Middle Power Status

On 7th May 2025, Pakistan’s military forces took the international security community by surprise when it demonstrated operational superiority against its larger belligerent adversary India with its rapid and coordinated response. The Four-Day conflict proved to be a watershed moment for Pakistan, marking its rapid emergence as an important player in the region. In recent years, amidst the ongoing global competition between the United States and China, Islamabad has adopted a position of ’Strategic Balancing,’ where it maintains ties of cooperation with both Beijing and Washington. Deft diplomacy, emphasis on geo-economics, and credible conventional and strategic deterrence have remained the foundational pillars for Pakistan’s ambition as a rising middle power

Read More »

Debunking the S-400 Shield: Lessons from the India-Pakistan Conflict

Air defense has always been a central aspect of warfare. In South Asia, the phenomenon carries immense significance due to compressed reaction times. In this context, one of the most-hyped systems is the Russian-made S-400, touted by New Delhi as a one-stop solution to counter aerial threats from both Pakistan and China.
The 2025 conflict between India and Pakistan marked an important chapter in testing the S-400 technology. The conflict began on May 7, when India attacked what it alleged were terrorist targets in both Pakistani-held Kashmir and Pakistan proper, using drone and missile strikes. The conflict lasted for four days, culminating in a U.S-facilitated ceasefire. However, the brief conflict debunked a lot of the myths regarding the S-400 technology.
First, India claimed that the mobile S-400 would be able to control Pakistan’s airspace. In contrast, Pakistani aircraft continued to operate freely, according to official briefings by the Pakistani military. Although the Pakistan Air Force (PAF) aircraft were in their own airspace, they were still within the air defense range.

Read More »