Uswa Khan-India-PsedoSat-MDS-a

The advent of technology has compelled states to revolutionise their security structures which can withstand the escalating threats concerns vis à vis land, sea, and airspace domains. Over time, an integral component in the domain of warfare has gained exponential importance i.e., space and satellites. The dependency of states on aerospace assets has created both opportunities and challenges, enabling governments to acquire and utilise space assets especially to enhance their military capabilities. This militarisation of space has resulted in a deep sense of insecurity among nations.

The United Kingdom (UK), United States (US), Russia, China, India, Germany, Italy, and  Israel are increasingly employing space assets primarily for intelligence, surveillance, remote sensing, and communication purposes. Over 90% of the UK’s military forces are reliant on space assets, whereas the dependency of the US on the space-based capabilities  is crucial because it serves as a critical enabler for satellites communication, navigation, missile warnings – missile tracking (MW/MT) and intelligence gathering. In this context, another significant addition in the aerospace technologies is High Altitude Pseudo-Satellites (HAPS).

HAPS are autonomous and solar battery-powered multi-mission military unmanned aerial vehicles. They can remain stationary (airborne) unlike other satellites, providing extensive geographical coverage, maritime monitoring, military surveillance and reconnaissance, and multiple payloads. HAPS have long endurance for extended periods of time i.e., weeks to months with an approximate altitude of 65,000 feet. They serve as a vital link between satellites and ground-based telecommunication networks mainly for facilitating data transfer.

In South Asia, India is considered a key player in manufacturing aerospace technologies and HAPS for enhancing their Command, Control, Communications, Computers, Intelligence and Surveillance (C4ISR). In pursuit of regional hegemony and global influence, Indian NewSpace Research and Technologies (NRT) Private Limited and Hindustan Aeronautics Limited (HAL) have developed  a solar powered HAP named ‘Combat Air Teaming System – CATS Infinity’.  It will be used for deep aerial strikes, surveillance and real-time communication purposes i.e., military and civilian applications with an endurance level of three months

With the help of these pseudo satellites one can assume that India can reap multiple strategic and military benefits. HAPS are considerably cost-effective as compared to other satellites. Additionally, they can aid in border patrolling due to their area specific monitoring, offering live imagery and communication to military for their operations in remote areas which can help India to monitor its borders with China and Pakistan. In maritime operations, one technical task is the ‘problem of identification’ of vessels, whether they are civilian or navy vessels/warships. HAPS can aptly identify and differentiate the incoming vessels due to their high definition optical and infrared camera. This technology will enable the Indian Armed Forces to have efficient and effective naval operations and surveillance in the Indian Ocean Region (IOR). It is worth mentioning that high-resolution capability of HAPS can be used to monitor the deployment and movements of the strategic assets which may establish new avenues for espionage or surveillance both in times of peace and conflict.

On the other hand, advancements in the acquisition and development of indigenous pseudo-satellites and aerospace technologies by India may raise security concerns for the neighbouring countries especially Pakistan, considering the antagonistic history between the two. ‘Integrated Dynamics’ – a Pakistani privately-owned company – is also in the process of developing an indigenous version of high-altitude pseudo-satellites i.e., SOLARIS and STRATOS, for civilian as well as military purposes.

The significant investments in manufacturing or acquiring such advanced technologies may not align well with the pressing needs of both nations, given their current poverty levels – India at 21.9% and Pakistan at 24.3%. This allocation dilemma highlights a pivotal concern: the trade-off between enhancing military capabilities and addressing critical development challenges that directly affect citizens’ lives and livelihoods. In this context, an analytical conclusion suggests a strategic pivot is necessary. Instead of engaging in a technological arms race, India and Pakistan could achieve greater benefits by reallocating resources towards initiatives aimed at reducing poverty, improving health, education, and economic opportunities for their citizens. Such a shift in priorities could not only significantly uplift the quality of life within both countries but also potentially ease regional tensions, fostering a climate of mutual growth and stability.

Uswa Khan is a Research Assistant at the Centre for Aerospace & Security Studies (CASS), Islamabad, Pakistan. She can be reached at [email protected].

Design Credit:  Mysha Dua Salma


Share this article

Facebook
Twitter
LinkedIn

Recent Publications

Browse through the list of recent publications.

The US-Israel War on Iran: Objectives, Strategy, and Escalation Management

Zahra Niazi
‘States tend to overestimate themselves or the benefits and swiftness of war, and to underestimate their opponents’ capabilities, intentions, or the costs and duration of war.’ If anything, the 2026 war initiated by the United States and Israel against Iran shall be remembered in the annals of warfare among the most visible manifestations of this dynamic.
The war, immediately preceded by the January mass protests in Iran, did not represent a sudden rupture but rather the continuation of a 47-year-long confrontation and a more intense phase of the June 2025 war.
The US Secretary of War, Pete Hegseth, defined the war’s objectives as being laser-focused: to destroy Iran’s missile capabilities and its security infrastructure, while ensuring that it could never develop nuclear weapons. Beyond these stated objectives, among the priorities on the continuum also lay the objective of regime change, with both President Trump and Prime Minister Netanyahu explicitly calling on the Iranian population to take over the government at the outset of the war.

Read More »

Marka-e-Haq to the Peace Talks: Pakistan’s Middle Power Status

On 7th May 2025, Pakistan’s military forces took the international security community by surprise when it demonstrated operational superiority against its larger belligerent adversary India with its rapid and coordinated response. The Four-Day conflict proved to be a watershed moment for Pakistan, marking its rapid emergence as an important player in the region. In recent years, amidst the ongoing global competition between the United States and China, Islamabad has adopted a position of ’Strategic Balancing,’ where it maintains ties of cooperation with both Beijing and Washington. Deft diplomacy, emphasis on geo-economics, and credible conventional and strategic deterrence have remained the foundational pillars for Pakistan’s ambition as a rising middle power

Read More »

Debunking the S-400 Shield: Lessons from the India-Pakistan Conflict

Air defense has always been a central aspect of warfare. In South Asia, the phenomenon carries immense significance due to compressed reaction times. In this context, one of the most-hyped systems is the Russian-made S-400, touted by New Delhi as a one-stop solution to counter aerial threats from both Pakistan and China.
The 2025 conflict between India and Pakistan marked an important chapter in testing the S-400 technology. The conflict began on May 7, when India attacked what it alleged were terrorist targets in both Pakistani-held Kashmir and Pakistan proper, using drone and missile strikes. The conflict lasted for four days, culminating in a U.S-facilitated ceasefire. However, the brief conflict debunked a lot of the myths regarding the S-400 technology.
First, India claimed that the mobile S-400 would be able to control Pakistan’s airspace. In contrast, Pakistani aircraft continued to operate freely, according to official briefings by the Pakistani military. Although the Pakistan Air Force (PAF) aircraft were in their own airspace, they were still within the air defense range.

Read More »