Nasser Ul Haq-Listen-MDS

Have you noticed a significant decline in our willingness to listen during everyday conversations? There was a time when our elders stressed the importance of letting someone finish their thoughts before responding. Nowadays, however, many of us tend to interrupt and only partially listen to others, rushing to assert our own opinions without fully understanding the subject. Ironically, this tendency is particularly prevalent among older individuals (not just youngsters) and those in positions of authority, who may see themselves as ‘all-knowing’, more experienced, or even infallible.

As Muslims, we claim to draw our inspiration from the Sunnah of our Holy Prophet (PBUH) but fail to emulate him in this particular aspect. The Prophet would attentively turn his entire body towards the speaker, demonstrating respect and giving importance to every individual he communicated with, regardless of their age, gender, or level of knowledge. ‘Consultation’ was an important Uswa-e-Husna, practiced by the Prophet. Despite the fact that he used to get direct guidance from the Almighty; he would consult his companions not only to groom them but also to leave a legacy and a norm for his followers. Are we following his legacy of consultation? Do we have enough tolerance to listen is the question that we must ask ourselves and find ways to overcome this shortcoming.

This dilemma of ‘not listening’ extends beyond the workplace and into our homes as well. Often, elder family members, such as fathers, initiate discussions with good intentions but find themselves speaking more to themselves than to others. The younger generation, despite being well-versed in modern technologies like AI and IoT, frequently lacks the opportunity to contribute meaningfully to these conversations, leading to unproductive exchanges. This intolerance is also evident on social media platforms, where many individuals are unwilling to consider perspectives different from their own.

Consider the talk shows on TV channels as an example, where invited experts often seem unwilling to listen to others’ viewpoints. More and more, one sees that news anchors impose their own perspectives, continually interrupting their guests. Similarly, in courtrooms, judges often interject quickly, not allowing lawyers to fully present their arguments. In essence, the norm in our culture has increasingly become one of interruption and a lack of patience.

What are the repercussions of this ‘not listening’ phenomenon that has infiltrated our society?

The habit of casually hearing others, or outright unwillingness to listen, can lead to receiving inaccurate or incomplete information, ultimately resulting in poor decision-making. For instance, when subordinates, who have conducted thorough qualitative and quantitative research on a subject, are ignored, it not only demotivates them but can also decrease the overall efficiency of an organisation. This lack of attention can foster conflict, division, and polarisation within a team or organisation.

Furthermore, when individuals hold back their contributions for fear of being dismissed, it stunts their developmental process, adversely affecting the quality of future leadership. In professional settings such as seminars, discussions, and conferences, audience members often make comments rather than asking questions. This behaviour can give the impression of knowing more than the expert speakers, reflecting a culture of intolerance and a difficulty in accepting others’ viewpoints.

To counteract this, a practical approach can be to consciously remind oneself during conversations to listen attentively. Mentally repeating phrases like ‘listen to him/her, let him/her complete’ can be an effective strategy to enhance our listening skills. This simple technique can foster a more respectful and productive exchange of ideas. By practicing this, we open ourselves to a wider range of perspectives, leading to more inclusive and well-informed decisions.

Another approach, advocated in psychology to enhance listening is through ‘empathetic listening.’ This involves actively trying to understand the speaker’s emotions and viewpoints, not just the words they are saying. When you listen empathetically, you are not just waiting for your turn to speak; instead, you are genuinely trying to grasp the speaker’s emotions and motivations. This technique requires patience, openness, and a non-judgmental attitude. By exercising empathetic listening, we not only hear what is being said but also connect with the speaker on an emotional level. This deepens mutual understanding and respect, fosters a stronger connection, and often leads to more effective and harmonious communication. Empathetic listening can transform conversations, making them more meaningful and productive, both in personal and professional settings.

As a society and nation, let us embrace the art of listening with open hearts and minds – it is a small step that can lead to giant leaps in understanding, collaboration and meaningful conversations.

Nasser Ul Haq Wyne is a retired Air Vice Marshal currently serving as Director at the Centre for Aerospace & Security Studies, Islamabad, Pakistan. He can be contacted at: [email protected].


Share this article

Facebook
Twitter
LinkedIn

Recent Publications

Browse through the list of recent publications.

The US-Israel War on Iran: Objectives, Strategy, and Escalation Management

Zahra Niazi
‘States tend to overestimate themselves or the benefits and swiftness of war, and to underestimate their opponents’ capabilities, intentions, or the costs and duration of war.’ If anything, the 2026 war initiated by the United States and Israel against Iran shall be remembered in the annals of warfare among the most visible manifestations of this dynamic.
The war, immediately preceded by the January mass protests in Iran, did not represent a sudden rupture but rather the continuation of a 47-year-long confrontation and a more intense phase of the June 2025 war.
The US Secretary of War, Pete Hegseth, defined the war’s objectives as being laser-focused: to destroy Iran’s missile capabilities and its security infrastructure, while ensuring that it could never develop nuclear weapons. Beyond these stated objectives, among the priorities on the continuum also lay the objective of regime change, with both President Trump and Prime Minister Netanyahu explicitly calling on the Iranian population to take over the government at the outset of the war.

Read More »

Marka-e-Haq to the Peace Talks: Pakistan’s Middle Power Status

On 7th May 2025, Pakistan’s military forces took the international security community by surprise when it demonstrated operational superiority against its larger belligerent adversary India with its rapid and coordinated response. The Four-Day conflict proved to be a watershed moment for Pakistan, marking its rapid emergence as an important player in the region. In recent years, amidst the ongoing global competition between the United States and China, Islamabad has adopted a position of ’Strategic Balancing,’ where it maintains ties of cooperation with both Beijing and Washington. Deft diplomacy, emphasis on geo-economics, and credible conventional and strategic deterrence have remained the foundational pillars for Pakistan’s ambition as a rising middle power

Read More »

Debunking the S-400 Shield: Lessons from the India-Pakistan Conflict

Air defense has always been a central aspect of warfare. In South Asia, the phenomenon carries immense significance due to compressed reaction times. In this context, one of the most-hyped systems is the Russian-made S-400, touted by New Delhi as a one-stop solution to counter aerial threats from both Pakistan and China.
The 2025 conflict between India and Pakistan marked an important chapter in testing the S-400 technology. The conflict began on May 7, when India attacked what it alleged were terrorist targets in both Pakistani-held Kashmir and Pakistan proper, using drone and missile strikes. The conflict lasted for four days, culminating in a U.S-facilitated ceasefire. However, the brief conflict debunked a lot of the myths regarding the S-400 technology.
First, India claimed that the mobile S-400 would be able to control Pakistan’s airspace. In contrast, Pakistani aircraft continued to operate freely, according to official briefings by the Pakistani military. Although the Pakistan Air Force (PAF) aircraft were in their own airspace, they were still within the air defense range.

Read More »