Shaheer Ahmad-Sem-Rac-Pak-Oped thumbnail-July-2024- AP (1)

In the escalating theatre of great power competition, semiconductors have emerged as indispensable actors. These tiny components, often smaller than a fingernail, are the backbone of a wide array of applications, from communications and aerospace to automobiles and advanced weapon systems. Their omnipresence underscores their role as catalysts of technological and economic advancement, positioning them at the core of contemporary national security strategies and policy calculus.

Amidst the COVID-19 Pandemic, the global supply chain of semiconductors faced widespread disruptions, affecting 169 sectors, which resulted in price hikes and deferred orders. It was this fear of supply chain disturbance and the subsequent geopolitical tussle, specifically between the United States (US) and China, that brought semiconductors into the global spotlight. Governments are realising the significance of semiconductors as a bargaining chip and source of competitive edge in the global technological landscape. Now more than ever, emerging economies are determined to reduce their external dependency and achieve self-sufficiency in developing and manufacturing semiconductors.

China, the world’s largest consumer of semiconductors, is pushing to challenge the US’ stature as a leading technological hub. Through initiatives like ‘Made in China,’ it aims to reduce its external dependence by enhancing its domestic semiconductor production. It has taken a bold step to enhance semiconductor manufacturing capabilities by pumping USD 47.5 billion into its ‘National Integrated Circuit Industry Fund’. The investment is distributed along the targeted areas of semiconductor production and advanced manufacturing capabilities. This directed effort will help China establish a thriving ecosystem, which will strengthen indigenous production capacity and overcome global supply challenges.

Conversely, the US, which has also realised its susceptibility to global supply chain disruption, is pursuing a de-risking approach to maintain its technological resilience. Despite its prominence in R&D, the US faces formidable challenges in semiconductor manufacturing. In this regard, it is playing out the ‘CHIPS Act’ to tighten export controls on cutting-edge technologies and hinder China’s military modernisation. It has also been working with East Asian actors, including Taiwan, South Korea, and Japan, under the ‘Chip 4’ alliance. Moreover, in 2023, the US inked partnership plans with India on semiconductor supply chain resiliency and diversification, with the Micron company pledging USD 2.75 billion to establish a semiconductor facility in the country. Incidentally, both states are already engaged in the ‘initiative on Critical and Emerging Technology’ (iCET) since 2022.

This global technological bifurcation and growing Indo-US cooperation has formidable security implications for Pakistan. At the moment, domestic semiconductor industry remains underdeveloped due to economic uncertainty, lack of digital infrastructure and slow policy implementation. While a comprehensive ‘National Semiconductor Plan’, put together by  industry experts and academia in 2022, exists on paper, it was only recently that the government indicated interest in developing a semiconductor/chip design industry. The latter would need an estimated investment of USD 6-7 billion as well as skilled human resources. Global technological tensions, bloc politics and slogans of ‘chip nationalism’ are also likely to make this a difficult journey for Pakistan.

Difficult but not impossible! After all, Pakistan was the first country in Asia to produce the base material for semiconductors and has the potential to generate USD 4 billion annually in this market. According to one industry expert, what the country needs is a ‘fast-track approach’. For one thing, Pakistan must diversify its strategic partnerships with countries like China, Japan, the Netherlands and South Korea who are leading the board in this domain as well as partnerships with private corporations like Intel, Nvidia and Huawai etc. While semiconductor development requires significant financial resources, Pakistan could also consider focusing on the  less expensive testing and packaging phases. These steps could enable development of a nascent industrial base.

Semiconductors are the new battleground in the global power landscape, where India in South Asia, helped by the US, is aggressively pursuing a position as a formidable player in this critical technology. India’s advancements could serve as a foundation for more assertive posturing, posing potential threats to Pakistan’s national security and technological sovereignty. In response, Pakistan ought to strive toward establishing a foothold in the semiconductor market. Maintaining technological parity and safeguarding national security will be crucial as the region confronts this new era of technological competition.

Shaheer Ahmad is a Research Assistant at the Centre for Aerospace & Security Studies (CASS), Islamabad, Pakistan. He can be reached at [email protected]


Share this article

Facebook
Twitter
LinkedIn

Recent Publications

Browse through the list of recent publications.

The US-Israel War on Iran: Objectives, Strategy, and Escalation Management

Zahra Niazi
‘States tend to overestimate themselves or the benefits and swiftness of war, and to underestimate their opponents’ capabilities, intentions, or the costs and duration of war.’ If anything, the 2026 war initiated by the United States and Israel against Iran shall be remembered in the annals of warfare among the most visible manifestations of this dynamic.
The war, immediately preceded by the January mass protests in Iran, did not represent a sudden rupture but rather the continuation of a 47-year-long confrontation and a more intense phase of the June 2025 war.
The US Secretary of War, Pete Hegseth, defined the war’s objectives as being laser-focused: to destroy Iran’s missile capabilities and its security infrastructure, while ensuring that it could never develop nuclear weapons. Beyond these stated objectives, among the priorities on the continuum also lay the objective of regime change, with both President Trump and Prime Minister Netanyahu explicitly calling on the Iranian population to take over the government at the outset of the war.

Read More »

Marka-e-Haq to the Peace Talks: Pakistan’s Middle Power Status

On 7th May 2025, Pakistan’s military forces took the international security community by surprise when it demonstrated operational superiority against its larger belligerent adversary India with its rapid and coordinated response. The Four-Day conflict proved to be a watershed moment for Pakistan, marking its rapid emergence as an important player in the region. In recent years, amidst the ongoing global competition between the United States and China, Islamabad has adopted a position of ’Strategic Balancing,’ where it maintains ties of cooperation with both Beijing and Washington. Deft diplomacy, emphasis on geo-economics, and credible conventional and strategic deterrence have remained the foundational pillars for Pakistan’s ambition as a rising middle power

Read More »

Debunking the S-400 Shield: Lessons from the India-Pakistan Conflict

Air defense has always been a central aspect of warfare. In South Asia, the phenomenon carries immense significance due to compressed reaction times. In this context, one of the most-hyped systems is the Russian-made S-400, touted by New Delhi as a one-stop solution to counter aerial threats from both Pakistan and China.
The 2025 conflict between India and Pakistan marked an important chapter in testing the S-400 technology. The conflict began on May 7, when India attacked what it alleged were terrorist targets in both Pakistani-held Kashmir and Pakistan proper, using drone and missile strikes. The conflict lasted for four days, culminating in a U.S-facilitated ceasefire. However, the brief conflict debunked a lot of the myths regarding the S-400 technology.
First, India claimed that the mobile S-400 would be able to control Pakistan’s airspace. In contrast, Pakistani aircraft continued to operate freely, according to official briefings by the Pakistani military. Although the Pakistan Air Force (PAF) aircraft were in their own airspace, they were still within the air defense range.

Read More »