gender based terrorism

The involvement of women in acts of terror is not a new phenomenon at a global level. However, it has gained significant attention in Pakistan, particularly in recent times, amidst the resurgence of extremist activities. When examining international patterns, the role of women in such acts can be analysed at two distinct levels: direct participation or as enablers and facilitators. In the context of the current dynamics of terrorism in Pakistan, women are actively involved in various aspects, such as intelligence gathering, recruiting individuals for suicide bombings, and, in certain cases, even direct engagement in acts of terror.

Despite the occurrence of the first reported female suicide attack in Bajaur, Pakistan in 2010, this phenomenon has failed to garner adequate attention from policymakers.

The recent arrest of Mahil Baloch, a suspected suicide bomber, highlights the emerging trend of terrorist organisations strategically recruiting women to exploit gender-based advantages. During investigations, it was revealed that Mahil Baloch was influenced by her husband, who was an active member of the Baloch Liberation Force (BLF). After his death, she was approached by the BLF and subsequently decided to become part of its network of operatives. It was further found that a close relative of hers, Bibi Gul, also played the role of a facilitator. She helped the BLF to transfer funds. Later, she was shifted to Iran, and a third female relative, Pari Gul, took over. Involvement of three women from a single family is cause for alarm and needs attention of policymakers and stakeholders to broaden the scope of countering terrorism strategies in Pakistan.

Similarly, in April 2022, Shari Mari, member of a separatist organisation active in Balochistan killed four people at the Karachi University in a suicide attack, including three Chinese nationals. She was a highly educated woman but was inspired by extremist narratives and ended up becoming a suicide bomber.

The circumstances of these female terrorists are not totally different, though one was highly educated (Master of Philosophy) and the other had done matriculation, both had children, relatives and were reportedly not facing any economic or social difficulties. Considering their situation, it is important to note that the detection of female terrorists is very hard and complex. Therefore, there is need to embed a strategy for gender-based terrorist detection in Pakistan.

Terrorist organisations plan their recruitment process very smartly. They often recruit members based on their objectives, ideology, and gender. Considering these factors, no single and uniform recruitment policy or method has ever been identified. In the case of Pakistan, extremist organisations are primarily focused on recruiting individuals who align with their objectives and ideologies. However, there is a growing recognition among these groups regarding the significance of gender-based recruitment. The prevailing trend indicates that extremist groups within the country are actively seeking to recruit females, aiming to inflict profound and enduring damage while making the reversal of this process challenging.

Pakistan’s disproportionately low representation of women in the workforce, with only 20 percent participation, not only falls behind international standards but also lags within South Asia. This gender imbalance leads to the underutilisation of women’s potential energies, leaving them with idle hours that may make them more susceptible to recruitment by terrorist/extremist organisations, particularly through online platforms and social media. It is crucial to recognise that these women also bear the responsibility of shaping the next generation. If influenced by extremist narratives, their presence as primary caregivers increases the likelihood of nurturing a vulnerable generation predisposed to violence and terrorism. This cycle perpetuates the potential for further recruitment and poses a long-term threat to societal stability and security.

In Pakistan’s counterterrorism policy, the focus on countering female recruitment by terrorist/extremist organisations has not been given priority. The prevailing perception links ‘terrorism’ predominantly with males, leading to an oversight of the significant role women can play in preventing and countering terrorism. By providing appropriate training and resources, women can be empowered to detect early signs of radicalisation within society. In this regard, the KPK elite women commandos inclusion and active participation in law enforcement agencies is a step in the right direction. Their presence will improve community engagement, particularly with women and children. They serve as role models, inspiring other women to participate in security-related activities, while also fostering trust and cooperation within the local communities. In a conservative society like Pakistan, the inclusion of elite women commandos will also prove beneficial in handling situations where the presence of male officers may be perceived as intrusive or culturally inappropriate. This approach has helped bridge gaps, reduce tensions, and strengthen relationships between security forces and local communities.

In general, given women’s’ access to educational institutions, religious seminaries, and social events, they can serve as crucial messengers in promoting an anti-terrorism narrative within society. To effectively address gender-based terrorism, it is essential to identify areas with a high concentration of terrorist activities. Implementing a comprehensive de-radicalisation programme targeted specifically at females in such areas can also be instrumental in reversing the damage already inflicted. By prioritising their reintegration into society and providing support services, the country can work towards countering extremist ideologies and creating a more resilient society.

Asad Ullah Khan is a Senior Research Associate at the Centre for Aerospace & Security Studies (CASS), Islamabad, Pakistan. The article was first published in Modern Diplomacy. He can be reached at: [email protected].

Design Credit: Mysha Dua Salman

Images: Online sources


Share this article

Facebook
Twitter
LinkedIn

Recent Publications

Browse through the list of recent publications.

The US-Israel War on Iran: Objectives, Strategy, and Escalation Management

Zahra Niazi
‘States tend to overestimate themselves or the benefits and swiftness of war, and to underestimate their opponents’ capabilities, intentions, or the costs and duration of war.’ If anything, the 2026 war initiated by the United States and Israel against Iran shall be remembered in the annals of warfare among the most visible manifestations of this dynamic.
The war, immediately preceded by the January mass protests in Iran, did not represent a sudden rupture but rather the continuation of a 47-year-long confrontation and a more intense phase of the June 2025 war.
The US Secretary of War, Pete Hegseth, defined the war’s objectives as being laser-focused: to destroy Iran’s missile capabilities and its security infrastructure, while ensuring that it could never develop nuclear weapons. Beyond these stated objectives, among the priorities on the continuum also lay the objective of regime change, with both President Trump and Prime Minister Netanyahu explicitly calling on the Iranian population to take over the government at the outset of the war.

Read More »

Marka-e-Haq to the Peace Talks: Pakistan’s Middle Power Status

On 7th May 2025, Pakistan’s military forces took the international security community by surprise when it demonstrated operational superiority against its larger belligerent adversary India with its rapid and coordinated response. The Four-Day conflict proved to be a watershed moment for Pakistan, marking its rapid emergence as an important player in the region. In recent years, amidst the ongoing global competition between the United States and China, Islamabad has adopted a position of ’Strategic Balancing,’ where it maintains ties of cooperation with both Beijing and Washington. Deft diplomacy, emphasis on geo-economics, and credible conventional and strategic deterrence have remained the foundational pillars for Pakistan’s ambition as a rising middle power

Read More »

Debunking the S-400 Shield: Lessons from the India-Pakistan Conflict

Air defense has always been a central aspect of warfare. In South Asia, the phenomenon carries immense significance due to compressed reaction times. In this context, one of the most-hyped systems is the Russian-made S-400, touted by New Delhi as a one-stop solution to counter aerial threats from both Pakistan and China.
The 2025 conflict between India and Pakistan marked an important chapter in testing the S-400 technology. The conflict began on May 7, when India attacked what it alleged were terrorist targets in both Pakistani-held Kashmir and Pakistan proper, using drone and missile strikes. The conflict lasted for four days, culminating in a U.S-facilitated ceasefire. However, the brief conflict debunked a lot of the myths regarding the S-400 technology.
First, India claimed that the mobile S-400 would be able to control Pakistan’s airspace. In contrast, Pakistani aircraft continued to operate freely, according to official briefings by the Pakistani military. Although the Pakistan Air Force (PAF) aircraft were in their own airspace, they were still within the air defense range.

Read More »