Gaza under Attack-MDS-Op2-APP

The persistent violence by Israel has spanned decades, yet the recent escalation, in the aftermath of Hamas’s ‘Operation Al Aqsa’, is unparalleled. The overwhelming evidence of a massive humanitarian crisis in Gaza is deeply shocking and heart-wrenching. This article highlights and denounces Israeli actions that amount to war crimes, while also critiquing the West’s response to these atrocities.

An Israeli official statement claimed they dropped 6,000 bombs within a week. The accompanying photographs showcased densely populated areas of the Gaza Strip – including schools, hospitals, and residential towers – reduced to rubble. For perspective, the month-long bombardment by the anti-ISIS coalition in Iraq and Syria was less intense compared to the strikes on an area covering just 140 sq miles in Gaza.

As of October 23rd, incessant Israeli onslaught had killed 5087 Palestinians in Gaza alone with 62% being children and women, and injured 15,273, as per the United Nations’ humanitarian coordination office for Occupied Palestinian Territories (OPT). Heavy aerial bombardments, part of the Israeli ‘Iron Swords’ operation, have ravaged the Gaza Strip, leading to the appalling loss of 436 Palestinian civilians including women, children, ambulance workers, doctors and teachers in just the last 24 hours, while referring to them as ‘human animals’.

The Israeli government also coerced 1.1 million people to transfer south within 24 hours, which according to the United Nations human rights office ‘combined with the imposition of a complete siege of Gaza, may not be considered as lawful temporary evacuation and would therefore amount to a forcible transfer of civilians in breach of international law.’

At least 50 families have been erased from the Gaza registry, their lineages destroyed. Additionally, Israel has been found using White Phosphorus on civilians, again. Verified videos by Human Rights Watch show the use of ‘artillery-fired white phosphorus’ shells, an incendiary weapon that causes intense burns deep into human bones. Internationally, its use is prohibited even against military targets situated among civilians. A burn covering just 10% of the body from this substance can be fatal, and survivors often face lifelong afflictions. In these harrowing conditions, 5,552 out of 50,000 pregnant women in the area are anticipated to give birth next month, according to the UN Population Fund. But this ‘Nakba’ or catastrophe is not merely an account of Palestinian suffering since October 7th, rather a continuation of their decades-long pain under Israeli occupation.

Despite these vivid realities, brutal violence against Palestinian civilians seldom receives the same traction as Israel’s ‘defence’ does. Most agree that one should ‘side with the child over the gun; no matter whose child, no matter whose gun’. However, unverified/fake reports of 40 decapitated Israeli babies spread like wildfire on mainstream platforms such as CNN. Thereafter, they were used to justify the illegitimate ‘collective punishment’ of the Gazans, in violation of the Geneva Convention. Contrarily, Western leadership only vaguely condemned violence in Gaza without due attention to the 784 Palestinian children killed around the same time. Israeli Prime Minister also seems to distinguish between ‘children of light and children of darkness.’  And yet,  the ethnic cleansing of Palestinians has received only tepid condemnation from the West.

Instead of heeding UN warnings, the supposed torchbearers of the liberal order and beacon of human rights are enabling this humanitarian disaster with military aid and diplomatic support to Israel. Beyond the ten-year military aid package (2019-2028) amounting to USD 38 billion, purportedly for ‘self-defence’ (a cover for the Military-Industrial Complex), Israel has sought an additional USD 10 billion in emergency military assistance from the United States.

Moreover, the Biden administration has reportedly restricted its diplomats from using the words ‘de-escalation/ceasefire/restoring calm’, indicating the intent to continue this war. US Secretary of State Antony Blinken’s joint statement with Israeli PM Netanyahu also demonstrates strong backing of Israel. Similarly, President of the EU Commission, Ursula von der Leyen has repeatedly supported Israeli acts on her official Twitter handle. Furthermore, Israel’s measures to limit access to essential supplies like food and water, along with its targeting of civilian infrastructure, have met with notably muted criticism, especially when compared to the Western outcry against Russia’s actions in Ukraine. History will regard these global ‘leaders’ as complicit in genocide.

As it goes, it is only a matter of time until the indefensible crimes are shamed globally. However, history will also take note of the selective activism and the persistent financial, military, and diplomatic support that granted impunity to the Zionist regime. In recognition of this blatant duplicity, it is up to the Western population to hold their leaders accountable and to stand for the Palestinian people just as they did for their ‘blue-eyed’ counterparts of European descent in Ukraine. Palestinian voices must be amplified with the same rigour and the international community must demand an immediate ceasefire, extensive humanitarian aid and reparations large enough to compensate for this systematic genocide.

Bakhtawar Iftikhar is a Research Assistant at the Centre for Aerospace & Security Studies (CASS), Islamabad, Pakistan. She can be reached at [email protected]

Design Credit: Mysha Dua Salman


Share this article

Facebook
Twitter
LinkedIn

Recent Publications

Browse through the list of recent publications.

The Cover-up: IAF Narrative of the May 2025 Air Battle

Even after one year since the India-Pakistan May war of 2025, the Indian discourse regarding Operation Sindoor remains uncertain under its pretence of restraint. The Pahalgam attack on 22 April, which killed 26 people, triggered an escalatory spiral. New Delhi quickly accused Pakistan-linked elements, while Islamabad refuted the allegation and demanded an independent investigation. On 7 May, India launched attacks deep inside Pakistan under what it later termed as Operation Sindoor. The political motive was intended to turn the crisis into coercive signalling by shifting the blame onto the enemy and projecting a sense of military superiority.
This episode, however, began to fray immediately as war seldom follows the intended script. Within minutes PAF shot down 7 IAF aircraft including 4 Rafales. On 8 May, Reuters reported that at least two Indian aircraft were shot down by a Pakistani J-10C, while the local government sources reported other aircraft crashes in Indian-occupied Jammu and Kashmir

Read More »

Why the IAF’s Post-Sindoor Spending Surge is a Sign of Panic

After Operation Sindoor, India is spending billions of dollars on new weapons. This is being taken by many people as an indication of military prowess. It is not. This rush to procure weapons is in fact an acknowledgement that the Air Force in India had failed to do what it was meant to do. The costly jets and missiles that India had purchased over the years failed to yield the promised results.

Sindoor was soon followed by India in sealing the gaps which the operation had exposed. It was reported that Indian Air Force (IAF) is looking to speed up its purchases of more than 7 billion USD. This will involve other Rafale fighter jets with India already ordering 26 more Rafales to the Navy in 2024 at an estimated cost of about 3.9 billion USD. India is also seeking long-range standoff missiles, Israeli loitering munitions and increased drone capabilities. Special financial powers of the Indian military were activated to issue emergency procurement orders. The magnitude and rate of these purchases speak volumes.

Indian media and defence analysts have over the years considered the Rafale as a game changer. When India purchased 36 Rafales aircrafts at an approximate cost of 8.7 billion USD, analysts vowed that the aircraft would provide India with air superiority over Pakistan. Operation Sindoor disproved all those allegations. Indian aircraft did not even fly in Pakistani airspace when the fighting started. India solely depended on standoff weapons that were launched at a safe distance. The air defence system of Pakistan, comprising of the HQ-9 surface-to-air missile system and its own fighters, stood its ground.

Read More »

May 2025: Mosaic Warfare and the Myth of Centralised Air Power

Visualise a modern-day Air Force commander sitting in the operations room, miles away from the combat zone, overseeing every friendly and enemy aircraft and all assets involved in the campaign. In a split second, he can task a fighter, reposition a drone, and authorise a strike. In today’s promising technological era, he does not even need an operations room; a laptop on his desktop will suffice. The situation looks promising as it offers efficiency, precision, and control. The term used for such operational control is ‘centralisation’, which has been made possible with advanced networking, integrating space, cyber, surveillance, artificial intelligence, and seamless communication, enabling a single commander to manage an entire campaign from a single node. Centralised command and control, championed by the Western air forces and then adopted by many others, has thus been seen as a pinnacle of modern military power.
The concept of centralisation, enabled by state-of-the-art networking, may seem promising, but it is nothing more than a myth.

Read More »