3. Syed Ahmed Ali-Sau-Pak-Sec-Oped thumbnail-February-2026-APP

Although the SDMA does not identify an adversary, effectively functioning as a deterrent, it cannot be viewed in isolation from the Israeli belligerence in the Middle East. Israel’s war against Hamas has expanded beyond the genocide of Gaza; it has bombed the West Bank, Lebanon, Syria, Yemen, Iran, and recently Qatar. Tel Aviv’s campaign under the banners of ‘anti-Semitism’ and ‘terrorism’ has engulfed the whole Middle East in a war-like situation, which has generated new enemies and has deepened the instability of the region. This has raised concerns among the Arab world, who fear that this conflict’s spill-over effects could trigger regional instability in their country and give rise to new insurgencies.

To mitigate this looming crisis, Arab leaders have tried to lobby for a two-state solution, but in the absence of any effective regulatory body, Israel has no incentive to negotiate. This sense of frustration in Arab diplomats can be reflected in the statement by Jordanian Foreign Minister Aman Safadi in September 2024. He stated that Israel rejects the two-state proposal and has no solution to the Gaza crisis apart from escalating this perpetual conflict. The Houthis’ strikes on Aramco oil facilities and the recent strike in Doha made it clear to Saudi Arabia that neither American security guarantees nor International Law are credible sanctuaries in this volatile region. These factors made it clear to Riyadh that alternative security arrangements were necessary to fill this void.

In terms of historical ties, long-range missile capabilities, and battle-tested air force, Pakistan is the most favourable choice for Saudi Arabia to fulfil its security requirements. Islamabad enjoys close relations with Riyadh and has a history of operations in the Middle Eastern region. In 1951, Pakistan signed the “Treaty of Friendship” with Saudi Arabia, and another in 1982, “Deputation of Pakistan Armed Forces Personnel”. Islamabad has a rich history of training Arab forces. Official records show that Pakistan has trained more than 8,000 troops since 1967. Moreover, Pakistan Air Force (PAF), in particular, has proven its combat capability and a record of shooting down Israeli jets in the Arab Israeli wars of 1967 and 1973. More recently, in May of this year, PAF participated in a massive air war with India, where it coordinated over 120 aircraft and shot down 7 Indian jets. Pakistan’s long-range missile capabilities and a battle-tested air force can prove itself as an ideal security partner for Saudi Arabia to provide strategic stability in the Middle Eastern region.

The Middle Eastern state faces threats from both asymmetric unconventional as well as high-tech conventional warfare. With respect to insurgencies, Pakistan has extensive experience conducting counter terrorism operations and has a rich history of joint ventures with Gulf countries. In 2017, General Raheel Sharif, former Army Chief of Pakistan, was tasked with the leadership of the Islamic Military Alliance to Fight Terrorism (IMAFT).

Another rising threat for Saudi Arabia emanates from conventional high-tech militaries that employ Multi Domain Operations (MDOs). These operations define the nature of modern warfare as short, intense, complex, and information-driven. These characteristics are clearly reflected in recent conflicts, where aerospace and surface-to-surface missiles dominated the conflict. These domains are increasingly utilised as they are far easier and faster to mobilise than traditional land and maritime solutions. These solutions, while convenient strategic tools for quick response, operate under a highly complex environment of MDOs. Modern forces have to take into account threats from cyber, space, electromagnetic, and information domains, which often result in a series of dilemmas for the decision-makers. During the Four-Day War with India on 7th May, PAF successfully demonstrated its ability to operate in such an environment, though it remains a pressing challenge given its rapidly evolving nature.

The SDMA provides a unique opportunity for both countries. Saudi Arabia gains a reliable defence partner along with one of the world’s most capable air forces. Pakistan would secure the cooperation and assistance of the Saudi government, which is critical for the acceleration of its military modernisation plans.

The pact definitely has the potential to reshape the balance of power in the region and provide strategic stability to Saudi Arabia and, by extension Middle East. However, its success hinges on a shared political consensus on regional security, a sustainable ecosystem for long-term operations, and integration of joint military capabilities. Navigating these challenges will determine whether SDMA could evolve into a regional security bloc or remain merely a transactional arrangement.

Syed Ahmed Ali is a research assistant at the Centre for Aerospace and Security Studies (CASS), Islamabad, Pakistan.  The Article was first published by Defense Journal. He writes on technopolitics and can be reached at [email protected]


Share this article

Facebook
Twitter
LinkedIn

Recent Publications

Browse through the list of recent publications.

The Cover-up: IAF Narrative of the May 2025 Air Battle

Even after one year since the India-Pakistan May war of 2025, the Indian discourse regarding Operation Sindoor remains uncertain under its pretence of restraint. The Pahalgam attack on 22 April, which killed 26 people, triggered an escalatory spiral. New Delhi quickly accused Pakistan-linked elements, while Islamabad refuted the allegation and demanded an independent investigation. On 7 May, India launched attacks deep inside Pakistan under what it later termed as Operation Sindoor. The political motive was intended to turn the crisis into coercive signalling by shifting the blame onto the enemy and projecting a sense of military superiority.
This episode, however, began to fray immediately as war seldom follows the intended script. Within minutes PAF shot down 7 IAF aircraft including 4 Rafales. On 8 May, Reuters reported that at least two Indian aircraft were shot down by a Pakistani J-10C, while the local government sources reported other aircraft crashes in Indian-occupied Jammu and Kashmir

Read More »

Why the IAF’s Post-Sindoor Spending Surge is a Sign of Panic

After Operation Sindoor, India is spending billions of dollars on new weapons. This is being taken by many people as an indication of military prowess. It is not. This rush to procure weapons is in fact an acknowledgement that the Air Force in India had failed to do what it was meant to do. The costly jets and missiles that India had purchased over the years failed to yield the promised results.

Sindoor was soon followed by India in sealing the gaps which the operation had exposed. It was reported that Indian Air Force (IAF) is looking to speed up its purchases of more than 7 billion USD. This will involve other Rafale fighter jets with India already ordering 26 more Rafales to the Navy in 2024 at an estimated cost of about 3.9 billion USD. India is also seeking long-range standoff missiles, Israeli loitering munitions and increased drone capabilities. Special financial powers of the Indian military were activated to issue emergency procurement orders. The magnitude and rate of these purchases speak volumes.

Indian media and defence analysts have over the years considered the Rafale as a game changer. When India purchased 36 Rafales aircrafts at an approximate cost of 8.7 billion USD, analysts vowed that the aircraft would provide India with air superiority over Pakistan. Operation Sindoor disproved all those allegations. Indian aircraft did not even fly in Pakistani airspace when the fighting started. India solely depended on standoff weapons that were launched at a safe distance. The air defence system of Pakistan, comprising of the HQ-9 surface-to-air missile system and its own fighters, stood its ground.

Read More »

May 2025: Mosaic Warfare and the Myth of Centralised Air Power

Visualise a modern-day Air Force commander sitting in the operations room, miles away from the combat zone, overseeing every friendly and enemy aircraft and all assets involved in the campaign. In a split second, he can task a fighter, reposition a drone, and authorise a strike. In today’s promising technological era, he does not even need an operations room; a laptop on his desktop will suffice. The situation looks promising as it offers efficiency, precision, and control. The term used for such operational control is ‘centralisation’, which has been made possible with advanced networking, integrating space, cyber, surveillance, artificial intelligence, and seamless communication, enabling a single commander to manage an entire campaign from a single node. Centralised command and control, championed by the Western air forces and then adopted by many others, has thus been seen as a pinnacle of modern military power.
The concept of centralisation, enabled by state-of-the-art networking, may seem promising, but it is nothing more than a myth.

Read More »