Share this article

Facebook
Twitter
LinkedIn

Abstract: Social media has emerged as an instrument of online discourse which enables people to create and share content at a prodigious rate. This media is rapidly changing the public engagement environment and setting trends and agendas on matters that range from the environment and politics to technology, entertainment and even warfare. However, social media has also given unregulated power to state and non-state actors to spread misinformation, false news, and disinformation. As this unregulated power continues to grow, governments are demanding the social media networks to regulate their content to minor impact. Due to this reason, states have initiated the process of developing their own social media regulations to address their unique issues. This Working Paper presents three options for social media regulation frameworks: first, self-regulation by social media companies; second, limited government regulations that suggest targeted social media rules to address their shortcomings; third, comprehensive government regulatory mechanisms that use a broad-based approach to social media rules. It is concluded that limited government regulations would be the most suitable solution for a country like Pakistan. Guidelines on how Pakistan can form and adopt this type of framework are suggested.

RESEARCH AND PUBLICATIONS

 

Recent Publications

Browse through the list of recent publications.

Deterrent Value of Democracy

The title of this article might raise a few eyebrows because the term “deterrence” is considered the exclusive domain of the strategic community, at least in Pakistan.
1512 views

Read More »

Stay Connected

Follow and Subscribe

© 2022 CASSTT ALL RIGHTS RESERVED

Developed By Team CASSTT

Contact CASS

CASS (Centre for Aerospace & Security Studies), Old Airport Road, Islamabad, Pakistan.
+92 51 5405011
cass.thinkers@casstt.com
career@casstt.com

Disclaimer

 All views and opinions expressed or implied are those of the authors/speakers/internal and external scholars and should not be construed as carrying the official sanction of CASS.