Uswa Khan-FMs-Air-War-Oped thumbnail-June-2024-AP

Contemporary air warfare has significantly evolved across various levels of engagement. Recent combat trends in the Russia-Ukraine conflict highlight the changing nature of air warfare in this domain. During this conflict, the use of ‘Force Multipliers’(FMs) such as airborne warning and control systems (AWACS), air-to-air refuelers, and precision-guided munitions (PGMs) has demonstrated their efficacy and importance in achieving dominance over the adversary. In this context, it is important to assess the force multipliers being utilised by modern air forces worldwide.

The United States Air Force (USAF), renowned for its cutting-edge fleet of aerial platforms and powerful force multipliers, consistently strives to maintain its technological edge in the realm of AWACS. By 2027, the USAF plans to bolster this supremacy by inducting 26 state-of-the-art E-7A Wedgetail aircraft, setting a new standard for aerial command and control. The advanced capabilities of E-7A are likely to be much more than the existing E-3 AWACS already in service with the USAF. USAF also has diverse types of aerial tankers for refuelling with different ranges and storage capacities to cater to its operational requirements. These include KC-135 Stratotanker, KC-46 Pegasus, KC-10 Extender, and MC-130. The KC-135 Stratotanker remains the backbone of the USAF in executing refuelling missions. It has 294 KC-135 in service and reserve that can carry 90,719 kg of fuel.

China is also vying with the US for supremacy in the domain of force multipliers. It boasts a substantial fleet of three main AWACS types: the KJ-2000, the Shaanxi KJ-200, and the Shaanxi KJ-500, each deployed in significant quantities to enhance its strategic capabilities. Moreover, the People’s Liberation Army Air Force (PLAAF) has recently inducted eight advanced YY-20A air-to-air refuelers. These modernised refuelers are designed to support the PLAAF’s most sophisticated aircraft, including the J-10 and J-20, significantly enhancing their aerial refueling capabilities and extending their operational reach. They can carry 83000-90, 200 litre jet fuel which can provide refueling to multiple air aircraft in single sorties.   Moreover, to enhance its precision strike capability, PLAAF is also procuring and inducting  advanced PGMs. A new glide bomb designed to accurately destroy the adversary’s airfield, known as ‘Tianlei-500’ or ‘Sky Thunder-500’, was inducted recently by the PLAAF. The weapon is unique in its ability to devastate and render an area as large as 6,000 sq. meters unusable for immediate purposes.

In the subcontinent, the Indian Air Force (IAF) is investing heavily in FMs and inducting indigenous AWACS like Netra. It has ordered six Netra platforms to be inducted in the coming years. The NETRA AWACS will have a 500 km range far more than existing platforms in service with IAF. Besides indigenisation of these systems, the IAF already maintains three Israeli-supplied AWACS in active service. Apart from AWACS, it has six air-to-air refuelers to extend its combat aircraft mission ranges. IAF ordered six additional platforms last year to further augment the IAF asset capabilities to remain airborne. In terms of PGMs, the IAF has made significant investments, particularly after the Balakot incident, where it failed to accurately strike its target. Following its failure, IAF procured various domestic and foreign PGMs. One of them is the Israeli manufactured   Rampage PGM, which can reach a maximum range of up to 250 km and hit its target with 10 meters circular error probable (CEP). Moreover, on the domestic side, ‘Gaurav’ PGM with 80 km has been in the production phase and would soon join the IAF’s operational fleet.

The Pakistan Air Force (PAF) initially purchased five SAAB-2000 AWACS from Sweden in 2006. To strengthen the fleet further, the PAF has also acquired additional AWACS from China. Besides AWACS, the PAF also inducted four Il-78MP air-to-air refueling aircraft in 2009. Since then, they have been part of the PAF’s operational force. PAF’s modern aircraft including JF-17s, and J-10s that can be refuelled mid-air. Additionally, the PAF procured modern PGMs enabling it to conduct precision strikes from long distances. This capability was effectively demonstrated during ‘Operation Swift Retort,’ where PAF planes successfully executed their mission, striking intended targets with PGMs.

Force Multipliers are now an integral part of the modern battlefield, providing a decisive edge that can influence the outcome of conflicts. Air forces worldwide recognise this shift, actively acquiring or developing these systems indigenously. Recent wars and conflicts have underscored the critical utility of AWACS, air-to-air refuelers, and PGMs in extending operational reach and ensuring precision strikes. Pakistan also realising this fact devotes due attention to the indigenisation process which will not only enhance the country’s defensive capabilities but also foster technological advancement and economic growth.

Uswa Khan is a Research Assistant at the Centre for Aerospace & Security Studies (CASS), Islamabad, Pakistan. She can be reached at [email protected].


Share this article

Facebook
Twitter
LinkedIn

Recent Publications

Browse through the list of recent publications.

The US-Israel War on Iran: Objectives, Strategy, and Escalation Management

Zahra Niazi
‘States tend to overestimate themselves or the benefits and swiftness of war, and to underestimate their opponents’ capabilities, intentions, or the costs and duration of war.’ If anything, the 2026 war initiated by the United States and Israel against Iran shall be remembered in the annals of warfare among the most visible manifestations of this dynamic.
The war, immediately preceded by the January mass protests in Iran, did not represent a sudden rupture but rather the continuation of a 47-year-long confrontation and a more intense phase of the June 2025 war.
The US Secretary of War, Pete Hegseth, defined the war’s objectives as being laser-focused: to destroy Iran’s missile capabilities and its security infrastructure, while ensuring that it could never develop nuclear weapons. Beyond these stated objectives, among the priorities on the continuum also lay the objective of regime change, with both President Trump and Prime Minister Netanyahu explicitly calling on the Iranian population to take over the government at the outset of the war.

Read More »

Marka-e-Haq to the Peace Talks: Pakistan’s Middle Power Status

On 7th May 2025, Pakistan’s military forces took the international security community by surprise when it demonstrated operational superiority against its larger belligerent adversary India with its rapid and coordinated response. The Four-Day conflict proved to be a watershed moment for Pakistan, marking its rapid emergence as an important player in the region. In recent years, amidst the ongoing global competition between the United States and China, Islamabad has adopted a position of ’Strategic Balancing,’ where it maintains ties of cooperation with both Beijing and Washington. Deft diplomacy, emphasis on geo-economics, and credible conventional and strategic deterrence have remained the foundational pillars for Pakistan’s ambition as a rising middle power

Read More »

Debunking the S-400 Shield: Lessons from the India-Pakistan Conflict

Air defense has always been a central aspect of warfare. In South Asia, the phenomenon carries immense significance due to compressed reaction times. In this context, one of the most-hyped systems is the Russian-made S-400, touted by New Delhi as a one-stop solution to counter aerial threats from both Pakistan and China.
The 2025 conflict between India and Pakistan marked an important chapter in testing the S-400 technology. The conflict began on May 7, when India attacked what it alleged were terrorist targets in both Pakistani-held Kashmir and Pakistan proper, using drone and missile strikes. The conflict lasted for four days, culminating in a U.S-facilitated ceasefire. However, the brief conflict debunked a lot of the myths regarding the S-400 technology.
First, India claimed that the mobile S-400 would be able to control Pakistan’s airspace. In contrast, Pakistani aircraft continued to operate freely, according to official briefings by the Pakistani military. Although the Pakistan Air Force (PAF) aircraft were in their own airspace, they were still within the air defense range.

Read More »