To date, much of Pakistan’s fiscal consolidation efforts have focused on the revenue side of the budgetary deficit, while expenditure management has remained relatively neglected. Statistical modeling reveals that increases in both current and development expenditures contribute to a rise in Pakistan’s overall fiscal deficit. A review of the government’s budgetary allocations for FY 2024-25 and the past four fiscal years indicates significant potential for cost savings in government spending. The findings underscore the need to reduce the budgetary burden of mark-up payments through prudent debt management strategies, growth-oriented policies, and a data-driven approach to monetary policy. Furthermore, the study recommends reviewing defence spending, particularly employee-related expenses, to identify potential costsaving opportunities and implementing broad-based power sector reforms to alleviate the fiscal burden of subsidies. It also calls for rationalising expenditures under the Benazir Income Support Program (BISP) by enhancing administrative quality, strengthening monitoring mechanisms, and improving public service delivery. Further, the study suggests downsizing by eliminating or merging government departments and agencies with overlapping functions and closing redundant entities. Comprehensive pension reforms, informed by international best practices, are also recommended. Finally, the study advocates for more equitable allocations under the Public Sector Development Program (PSDP) and for minimising operational inefficiencies in both allocation processes and spending activities.

Share this article
Internal Contradictions in U.S. National Security Strategy 2025
National Security Strategy (NSS) of United States, released by President Trump, intends to reform the miscalculations of past leaders and improve decades of Washington’s reach. Trump administration, as per the document, promises respect for sovereignty, restraint and renunciation of protracted global involvement. However, upon closer examination, the 33-pager document is full of internal inconsistencies. In contradiction to NSS, which vows to pull back from taking global responsibilities and adopts the policy of non-intervention, the U.S. pressurises other states through economic, military and political coercion.
Why Afghan Trade Can’t Bypass Pakistan
A year ago, the Sarhad Chamber of Commerce Industry (SCCI) and Pakistan-Afghanistan Joint Chamber of Commerce Industry (PAJCCI) reached a Memorandum of Understanding to boost trade between Pakistan and Afghanistan, only to end in doldrums in 2025. Due to the recent geopolitical tensions between the two states, the Taliban’s minister of commerce declared a trade boycott against Pakistan. While the move is compelled by the geopolitical rift, it is a miscalculated decision given the region’s geographical reality
Pakistan’s Sovereign Victory: Beyond the China Spectre
In an annual bid to review U.S.-China relations, the U.S.-China Economic and Security Review Commission’s (USCC) report for the year 2024-25 has overplayed the role

