cyber security

While the brighter side of the information revolution facilitated the human race in connecting more easily and conducting their businesses far more conveniently, the darker side of this revolution has yet to be fully understood. Interventions into the private lives of each person through data monitoring, data collection, data hacking, and using the same against them is one such aspect. From call monitoring to secret video surveillance, manipulating financial transactions to leaking sensitive data, nearly everything can be targeted about an individual’s lifestyle, financial integrity, and personal belongings. Therefore, it is necessary to create awareness about these aspects of cyber security, which has now become an integral element of human security and without which, the national security of any state remains compromised.

Information warfare has a long history of misinformation, propaganda campaigns, and deception, but it was never meant to intervene in the personal lives of individuals. However, as soon as we became accustomed to utilising the newly-developed information tools like smartphones, laptops, ATMs, and credit cards, dark web operators also became active to harm and hurt privacy and integrity through these means. The information tools developed to facilitate human beings are now being weaponised and used to hurt individuals, groups, society and even states.

People have now become so dependent on the available tools for communication, interaction, sharing information, entertainment, and even financial transactions, that an outage of certain web-based applications for just six hours on October 4 left many rudderless during the blackout across the globe.

Unfortunately, lack of awareness and consciousness about online safety and security, especially in Pakistan, for cultural reasons, has compounded the problem of individual data protection and security. In turn, it facilitates dark-web operators to easily target the users of these facilities.

The same holds for state institutions. Cyber security of state’s functioning has emerged as one of the weakest links and the most serious threats to its national security. This is particularly true for developing countries dependent on developed nations for the provision of hardware and software for their government’s organisational management.

The attack on Iran’s nuclear power plant through Stuxnet Worm in June 2010 is just one example of a cyber-attack on sensitive state institutions. Worm attacked and destroyed several centrifuges at the Natanz uranium enrichment facility, as part of the US-Israeli effort to slow down Iranian efforts to develop its alleged nuclear weapons programme. Likewise, recently-discovered Pegasus spyware, developed by an Israeli firm, can be installed in cell phones and other devices for monitoring and recording of data, and activities of users. Pegasus was widely used against prominent political figures around the world by various governments, including the Modi-led BJP government against its political rivals in India

While the rapid development in Information Technology has connected us to the world through “smart” devices. We do not realise that our voluntary acceptance of various web-based applications, which we install on our devices, has placed us at great risk of being monitored, recorded, and even hacked for harmful purposes. In fact, our cell phones act as virtual transmitters even if they are at off position. Whereas the purpose of such inventions was to achieve better connectivity, integration, and networking in the globalised world, they are now fully exploited by the relatively-developed states for 5th Generation Warfare (5GW) or hybrid warfare.

It is certainly the responsibility of the state to ensure the cyber security of its citizens, but the task is momentous. The citizens also bear the responsibility to safeguard their sensitive data and devices. In this regard, it is necessary to reduce our dependency on web-based applications, where possible. We need to regularly change our passwords, and avoid carrying cell phones to sensitive places of work. It may also be useful to follow multiple safety/verification mechanisms during online financial transactions.

Perhaps, it is also time to enhance awareness about the dangers and threats to cyber security faced by each individual, group, and state institution. While security establishments may have taken the necessary safeguards, it is incumbent upon the state to invest in the indigenous development of the requisite and robust hardware and software to ensure data security of its citizens, especially databases of the financial sector, government functionaries, and utilities.

Dr Zia Ul Haque Shamsi is the author of the book ‘Nuclear Deterrence and Conflict Management Between India and Pakistan’. He is presently working as the Director at the Centre for Aerospace & Security Studies (CASS). The article was initially published in Daily Times: https://dailytimes.com.pk/830680/evolving-challenges-of-cyber-security/


Share this article

Facebook
Twitter
LinkedIn

Recent Publications

Browse through the list of recent publications.

The Cover-up: IAF Narrative of the May 2025 Air Battle

Even after one year since the India-Pakistan May war of 2025, the Indian discourse regarding Operation Sindoor remains uncertain under its pretence of restraint. The Pahalgam attack on 22 April, which killed 26 people, triggered an escalatory spiral. New Delhi quickly accused Pakistan-linked elements, while Islamabad refuted the allegation and demanded an independent investigation. On 7 May, India launched attacks deep inside Pakistan under what it later termed as Operation Sindoor. The political motive was intended to turn the crisis into coercive signalling by shifting the blame onto the enemy and projecting a sense of military superiority.
This episode, however, began to fray immediately as war seldom follows the intended script. Within minutes PAF shot down 7 IAF aircraft including 4 Rafales. On 8 May, Reuters reported that at least two Indian aircraft were shot down by a Pakistani J-10C, while the local government sources reported other aircraft crashes in Indian-occupied Jammu and Kashmir

Read More »

Why the IAF’s Post-Sindoor Spending Surge is a Sign of Panic

After Operation Sindoor, India is spending billions of dollars on new weapons. This is being taken by many people as an indication of military prowess. It is not. This rush to procure weapons is in fact an acknowledgement that the Air Force in India had failed to do what it was meant to do. The costly jets and missiles that India had purchased over the years failed to yield the promised results.

Sindoor was soon followed by India in sealing the gaps which the operation had exposed. It was reported that Indian Air Force (IAF) is looking to speed up its purchases of more than 7 billion USD. This will involve other Rafale fighter jets with India already ordering 26 more Rafales to the Navy in 2024 at an estimated cost of about 3.9 billion USD. India is also seeking long-range standoff missiles, Israeli loitering munitions and increased drone capabilities. Special financial powers of the Indian military were activated to issue emergency procurement orders. The magnitude and rate of these purchases speak volumes.

Indian media and defence analysts have over the years considered the Rafale as a game changer. When India purchased 36 Rafales aircrafts at an approximate cost of 8.7 billion USD, analysts vowed that the aircraft would provide India with air superiority over Pakistan. Operation Sindoor disproved all those allegations. Indian aircraft did not even fly in Pakistani airspace when the fighting started. India solely depended on standoff weapons that were launched at a safe distance. The air defence system of Pakistan, comprising of the HQ-9 surface-to-air missile system and its own fighters, stood its ground.

Read More »

May 2025: Mosaic Warfare and the Myth of Centralised Air Power

Visualise a modern-day Air Force commander sitting in the operations room, miles away from the combat zone, overseeing every friendly and enemy aircraft and all assets involved in the campaign. In a split second, he can task a fighter, reposition a drone, and authorise a strike. In today’s promising technological era, he does not even need an operations room; a laptop on his desktop will suffice. The situation looks promising as it offers efficiency, precision, and control. The term used for such operational control is ‘centralisation’, which has been made possible with advanced networking, integrating space, cyber, surveillance, artificial intelligence, and seamless communication, enabling a single commander to manage an entire campaign from a single node. Centralised command and control, championed by the Western air forces and then adopted by many others, has thus been seen as a pinnacle of modern military power.
The concept of centralisation, enabled by state-of-the-art networking, may seem promising, but it is nothing more than a myth.

Read More »