Internal Defence

Defence day which is celebrated on 6th September, holds immense importance for Pakistani citizens. It is celebrated with full enthusiasm across the state, noting its historical significance. The day marks an important episode in the history of South Asia when the Pakistani armed forces, particularly the Pakistan Air Force (PAF) proved their mettle against a numerically superior Indian Air Force (IAF) during the Indo-Pak war of 1965. The event made it fairly evident that that one can outfight numerical strength with better leadership, training, tactics, and strategy.

The event’s legacy has continued; until now, our forces have shown their competence to defend the homeland from threats – be it the spread of terrorism after the commencement of the US War on Terror or Indian misadventures in Balakot, 2019. It has been proven over time that our armed forces very well know how to defend the homeland from external threats. However, it is equally important to pay attention to challenges emanating from within and threatening us as a nation.

It is high time to realise, assess and implement the concept of “defence” in a broader manner. The nature of challenges confronted by the state have evolved over time, so should be the means to address them effectively. While external threats will always hover over us, there is an even greater need to pay attention to the internal problems acting like parasites to our well-being.

Today, Pakistan faces a wide array of internal challenges. Some of them are political/social polarization, unstable economy, lack of education, weak policy-making, and ineffective implementation, etc. They remain a pressing challenge, adversely affecting millions of people’s lives and impeding our progress as a nation.

The most recent example in this regard is the menace of climate change, which has caused floods resulting in large-scale devastation across the state. The event illustrates how critical the threat from climate change is and how crucial it is to invest in this regard accordingly. Approximately 30 million citizens have been affected by the floods. Nearly a thousand people have lost their lives in a few days, and hundreds have been rendered homeless by nature’s fury.

The floods are not in isolation, and the displacement of such a large group of people is not the only concern; instead, the problems are multi-faceted. The damage to the infrastructure is significant, and it will take years to rebuild the lost property. The immense flooding has inflicted damage to the agricultural sector. Even worst, it has disrupted the supply chain routes and processes. This is likely to result in a shortage of commodities in the market and, ultimately, a spike of the prices. Furthermore, the spread of viral diseases is considerably more rapid in flood-afflicted areas. Unfortunately, the affected part of the state is already underdeveloped, which makes the impact more pronounced and long-lasting in those areas.

Hence, this event indicates the vulnerability of the citizens to such disasters. As always, the nation has responded open-heartedly to charities throughout the country, but this is not the permanent solution. It needs due attention from the concerned policymakers to find sustainable solutions against such threats. Defending ourselves from internal threats must be our key priority, both in individual and collective capacities. Undoubtedly, it is easier said than done, given that it will take considerable effort, time, resources, and relentless will to overcome these challenges. Nevertheless, it is our individual obligation to stir and encourage discussions around these aspects with a hope that the efforts will bear fruit in the longer run.

In the technological age, when nations are reaching space, it is extremely painful to watch the disturbing images of the devastation caused by the floods in our beloved homeland. Events like these should be a reminder as to where we are heading. This defence day will certainly be different, given that the nation is mourning the plight of the flood-afflicted fellow citizens. However, as we observe it, we should be mindful that Pakistan will not be able to reach its true potential until we defend it in an optimal manner. Our borders are strong, and our forces will continue to make them stronger, but defence from external threats is not enough. Pakistan is confronted with numerous internal challenges that must be addressed on a priority basis. In a similar manner, as Pakistan outdid a larger military with fewer resources in 1965, we need to revamp our effort to defend against the internal threats despite the existing challenges.

Shaza Arif is a Researcher at the Centre for Aerospace & Security Studies (CASS), Islamabad, Pakistan. The article was first published in Pakistan Observer. She can be reached at [email protected]


Share this article

Facebook
Twitter
LinkedIn

Recent Publications

Browse through the list of recent publications.

The Cover-up: IAF Narrative of the May 2025 Air Battle

Even after one year since the India-Pakistan May war of 2025, the Indian discourse regarding Operation Sindoor remains uncertain under its pretence of restraint. The Pahalgam attack on 22 April, which killed 26 people, triggered an escalatory spiral. New Delhi quickly accused Pakistan-linked elements, while Islamabad refuted the allegation and demanded an independent investigation. On 7 May, India launched attacks deep inside Pakistan under what it later termed as Operation Sindoor. The political motive was intended to turn the crisis into coercive signalling by shifting the blame onto the enemy and projecting a sense of military superiority.
This episode, however, began to fray immediately as war seldom follows the intended script. Within minutes PAF shot down 7 IAF aircraft including 4 Rafales. On 8 May, Reuters reported that at least two Indian aircraft were shot down by a Pakistani J-10C, while the local government sources reported other aircraft crashes in Indian-occupied Jammu and Kashmir

Read More »

Why the IAF’s Post-Sindoor Spending Surge is a Sign of Panic

After Operation Sindoor, India is spending billions of dollars on new weapons. This is being taken by many people as an indication of military prowess. It is not. This rush to procure weapons is in fact an acknowledgement that the Air Force in India had failed to do what it was meant to do. The costly jets and missiles that India had purchased over the years failed to yield the promised results.

Sindoor was soon followed by India in sealing the gaps which the operation had exposed. It was reported that Indian Air Force (IAF) is looking to speed up its purchases of more than 7 billion USD. This will involve other Rafale fighter jets with India already ordering 26 more Rafales to the Navy in 2024 at an estimated cost of about 3.9 billion USD. India is also seeking long-range standoff missiles, Israeli loitering munitions and increased drone capabilities. Special financial powers of the Indian military were activated to issue emergency procurement orders. The magnitude and rate of these purchases speak volumes.

Indian media and defence analysts have over the years considered the Rafale as a game changer. When India purchased 36 Rafales aircrafts at an approximate cost of 8.7 billion USD, analysts vowed that the aircraft would provide India with air superiority over Pakistan. Operation Sindoor disproved all those allegations. Indian aircraft did not even fly in Pakistani airspace when the fighting started. India solely depended on standoff weapons that were launched at a safe distance. The air defence system of Pakistan, comprising of the HQ-9 surface-to-air missile system and its own fighters, stood its ground.

Read More »

May 2025: Mosaic Warfare and the Myth of Centralised Air Power

Visualise a modern-day Air Force commander sitting in the operations room, miles away from the combat zone, overseeing every friendly and enemy aircraft and all assets involved in the campaign. In a split second, he can task a fighter, reposition a drone, and authorise a strike. In today’s promising technological era, he does not even need an operations room; a laptop on his desktop will suffice. The situation looks promising as it offers efficiency, precision, and control. The term used for such operational control is ‘centralisation’, which has been made possible with advanced networking, integrating space, cyber, surveillance, artificial intelligence, and seamless communication, enabling a single commander to manage an entire campaign from a single node. Centralised command and control, championed by the Western air forces and then adopted by many others, has thus been seen as a pinnacle of modern military power.
The concept of centralisation, enabled by state-of-the-art networking, may seem promising, but it is nothing more than a myth.

Read More »