US-Afghanistan-and-India-meeting

The hasty US exit from Afghanistan is being criticized by friends and foes alike. Some are calling it a humiliating defeat after a 20-year war. Images of staff being airlifted from the roof of the embassy building in Kabul are reminiscent of US exit from Saigon, exactly in the same manner, some five decades ago. If the US has been defeated in her longest ever war, so has been its new pliant state in the region, India.

Announcement of general amnesty by the Taliban reminds one of North Vietnamese Colonel Bui Tin’s statement while accepting the surrender of South Vietnam on 30 April, 1975, “You have nothing to fear; between Vietnamese there are no victors and no vanquished. Only the Americans have been defeated.” While the US is being severely criticized for its abrupt withdrawal from Afghanistan at home and abroad, has it really been defeated? It is difficult to comprehend that the US did not have a clear vision about its withdrawal.

Taliban advances far beyond US expectations also raise serious doubts about the American intelligence system and the ability of its military commanders to predict the exact post-withdrawal environment and outcome. It seems, there may be more to this than meets the eye. The US negotiated a peace deal with her sworn enemy, the Taliban, in exclusive meetings where even the facilitators were not permitted. So, what was exactly decided between the two parties is unknown.

Absence of any facilitators during these meetings raises serious questions about the exact nature of the deal. Unfortunately, we are not likely to learn the truth in the near future. Soon after announcement of US withdrawal from Afghanistan, Taliban initiated their offensive and rapidly captured almost the entire country and took over Kabul after the US- installed regime fled the country.

US-installed Afghan President Ashraf Ghani with bags full of US taxpayers’ dollars was provided political asylum by the United Arab Emirates, an ardent supporter of the Financial Action Task Force (FATF), with no mention of illegal wealth. While Taliban are in the process of forming an all-inclusive government, the US has frozen Afghan funds in American banks to the tune of USD 9 billion.

Under US coercion, IMF is withholding a tranche of USD 450 million. The World Bank has also frozen aid disbursement to Afghanistan. USD 4 billion promised by donors have also been held in abeyance. All these steps, on the behest of US are aimed at causing economic and financial strangulation of the country. Afghan banks have remained closed since August 15th, and ATMs are out of cash, thus denying citizens’ from purchasing daily commodities. There are also reports that suggest only two days of food supplies are left in the country.

With all funding stopped, the government would not be able to import urgently needed food and medicines. Lack of money and food shortages will cause dissatisfaction among the masses and ultimately result in loot and plunder. This, in turn, will create chaos in the country, which no government will be able to control, unless supplies are restored.

The denial of funding under US pressure, thus, appears to be a pre-planned step to create organized chaos in Afghanistan. Additionally, the US is also using Indian influence on Northern Alliance to create a civil war situation in certain parts of the country.

Chaos and a poor law and order situation in the country will put the region in turmoil, affecting all neighboring countries, including China, Russia, Iran and Pakistan. This will help US designs of creating unrest by seriously threatening China’s Belt and Road Initiative (BRI). A restive Afghanistan will deny Beijing’s planned connectivity to Central Asian states.

Turmoil in Afghanistan will also have its ramifications in Pakistan’s Northern provinces, thus threatening the China-Pakistan Economic Corridor (CPEC), as well as result in influx of refugees in neighboring countries, especially Pakistan and Iran. This in addition to creating economic problems, may also result in a precarious security situation for the two countries. While the US and its pliant state India may have their own designs to keep Afghanistan, and consequently, the region in turmoil, it is up to neighboring countries to thwart these plans.

Afghanistan’s neighbors, in their own self-interest, must join hands to stabilize Afghanistan. The most important aspect to be dealt with on war-footing is the provision of food and medicines on humanitarian grounds with UN food programme involvement, if possible. This one step will avert social unrest and lawlessness in the country, giving critical time to the government to strategize the future course of action. Failure of regional countries will fail the people of Afghanistan  and create problems for the region. If Afghanistan stabilizes, President Joe Biden and PM Narendra Modi will be remembered for their failed strategies and downfall of their respective countries.

The author is a retired Air Marshal of the PAF who served as Pakistan’s Air Adviser at New Delhi from 2002-2006, presently working as Director Strategic Defence and Security at Centre for Aerospace & Security Studies. This article was first published in Pakistan Observer. He can be reached at [email protected]

Image Source: امریکا له هند څخه په افغان سوله کې د کلیدي رول لوبولو غوښتنه وکړه. تاند. September 30, 2020.


Share this article

Facebook
Twitter
LinkedIn

Recent Publications

Browse through the list of recent publications.

The US-Israel War on Iran: Objectives, Strategy, and Escalation Management

Zahra Niazi
‘States tend to overestimate themselves or the benefits and swiftness of war, and to underestimate their opponents’ capabilities, intentions, or the costs and duration of war.’ If anything, the 2026 war initiated by the United States and Israel against Iran shall be remembered in the annals of warfare among the most visible manifestations of this dynamic.
The war, immediately preceded by the January mass protests in Iran, did not represent a sudden rupture but rather the continuation of a 47-year-long confrontation and a more intense phase of the June 2025 war.
The US Secretary of War, Pete Hegseth, defined the war’s objectives as being laser-focused: to destroy Iran’s missile capabilities and its security infrastructure, while ensuring that it could never develop nuclear weapons. Beyond these stated objectives, among the priorities on the continuum also lay the objective of regime change, with both President Trump and Prime Minister Netanyahu explicitly calling on the Iranian population to take over the government at the outset of the war.

Read More »

Marka-e-Haq to the Peace Talks: Pakistan’s Middle Power Status

On 7th May 2025, Pakistan’s military forces took the international security community by surprise when it demonstrated operational superiority against its larger belligerent adversary India with its rapid and coordinated response. The Four-Day conflict proved to be a watershed moment for Pakistan, marking its rapid emergence as an important player in the region. In recent years, amidst the ongoing global competition between the United States and China, Islamabad has adopted a position of ’Strategic Balancing,’ where it maintains ties of cooperation with both Beijing and Washington. Deft diplomacy, emphasis on geo-economics, and credible conventional and strategic deterrence have remained the foundational pillars for Pakistan’s ambition as a rising middle power

Read More »

Debunking the S-400 Shield: Lessons from the India-Pakistan Conflict

Air defense has always been a central aspect of warfare. In South Asia, the phenomenon carries immense significance due to compressed reaction times. In this context, one of the most-hyped systems is the Russian-made S-400, touted by New Delhi as a one-stop solution to counter aerial threats from both Pakistan and China.
The 2025 conflict between India and Pakistan marked an important chapter in testing the S-400 technology. The conflict began on May 7, when India attacked what it alleged were terrorist targets in both Pakistani-held Kashmir and Pakistan proper, using drone and missile strikes. The conflict lasted for four days, culminating in a U.S-facilitated ceasefire. However, the brief conflict debunked a lot of the myths regarding the S-400 technology.
First, India claimed that the mobile S-400 would be able to control Pakistan’s airspace. In contrast, Pakistani aircraft continued to operate freely, according to official briefings by the Pakistani military. Although the Pakistan Air Force (PAF) aircraft were in their own airspace, they were still within the air defense range.

Read More »