EMP_ARTICLE

Amongst emerging technologies Unmanned Aerial Systems (UAS) are making a profound impact both in civil and military sectors. Although this technology is not entirely new but due to exponential advancements in the last few years, it has emerged as a critical component in modern day warfare. The impact of UAS in the military domain is evident from the way they altered the course of events in the Nagorno Karabakh and Middle Eastern conflicts. The disruptive nature of UAS, coupled with technologies such as AI and cyber, has compelled strategists to devise extensive countermeasures against them.

UAS can be neutralized through kinetic (hard kill) as well as non-kinetic (soft kill) means. Kinetic measures refer to destroying the Unmanned Aerial Vehicle (UAV) in the air by using active means, whereas non-kinetic measures engage the UAS via electronic countermeasures to disable its systems.

An important non-kinetic measure to counter UAS is Electromagnetic Pulse (EMP) technology. The EMP-based technique uses an extremely strong pulse of focused energy which is used to impact the electronic equipment of the UAS by increasing the voltage of those systems. By interfering with the radio links, the EMP disrupts the command-and-control system of the UAV with its ground control station. The main targets of the EMP include various sensors, navigation system, and communication system of the UAS which are rendered ineffective.

Several countries are investing in UAS and counter-UAS technology. China has made significant progress not only in UAS, but also its countermeasures utilizing all available technological options, especially EMP. In August 2021, China reportedly tested EMP technology to shoot down an unmanned aircraft. This event marked the first Chinese test of this technology to neutralise UAS and has also highlighted the growing relevance of EMP technology against such systems.

While details regarding the test have not been revealed, some information is available. The test was conducted by the Chinese defence contractor China Electronics Technology Group (CETC). It involved one single UAV which was intercepted while it was flying at a height of 1,500 metres above sea level. The report stated that unusual behavior by the UAV was observed after it was struck by the EMP and it ‘veered from one side to another.’ Analysis of the debris recovered from the crash site suggests that sensitive electronic equipment was not damaged prior to the UAV’s collision on the ground. Wen Ynpeng, a CETC engineer, in his analysis suggested that induced flight control malfunction could be the reason for the unexpected behavior of the UAV which sent out an erroneous command signal.

Although the Chinese test involved only one UAV , its engineers are confident that the weapon will be equally effective against drone swarms as well.

The Chinese initiative can be viewed in response to US capabilities vis-Ă -vis EMP technology. The US has been equally interested in this technology to counter the challenges arising not only from UAS but also new techniques associated with such systems, such as drone swarming.

In 2012, Boeing along with US Air Force Research Laboratory (AFRL) conducted a test of Counter-Electronics High Power Microwave Advanced Missile Project (CHAMP) which was successful in disrupting 7 targets using EMP. The weapon was successful in disabling the electronics of its targets without destroying their structures. The Tactical High Power Operational Responder (THOR) is a recent initiative in this regard. Developed by the AFRL, this weapon employs EMP pulse to engage swarm of drones. The device will enable the Air Force to engage swarms of UAVS at a short range. In 2019, THOR demonstrated its capability to engage multiple drones with a single shot. The US Air Force is also looking towards developing advanced variants of THOR which will be more efficient and effective in engaging drones. Counter-Electronics High-Power Microwave Extended-Range Air Base Air Defence (Chimera) is an EMP weapon which will be used to engage swarms of UAVs at longer ranges. Likewise, considerable research and development is being done in the US to make advancement in EMP technology.

Russia is also developing its EMP Cannon to engage UAVs. In July 2021, it was reported that the Kremlin had tested its EMP Cannon capable of engaging a target 6 miles away. The cannon had been under development since 2015.

The increasing vulnerability of UAS against EMP makes it a strong anti-UAS asset. The Chinese test is a clear indication that EMP technology will be used more frequently against UAS. Since larger militaries are resorting to this technology, it is likely that other nations will also follow as well.

The Chinese EMP test also sheds light on how fast warfare is evolving. While, we continue to register new types of UAS and their associated techniques, the weapons to engage them are also making rapid advancements simultaneously. This event will serve as a reminder to other states regarding the importance of staying technologically updated to meet existing warfare requirements. Hence, there is a dire need to invest considerable effort and resources in technologies and their countermeasures to remain strategically relevant in contemporary warfare.

Shaza Arif is a Researcher at the Centre for Aerospace & Security Studies (CASS), Islamabad, Pakistan. This article was first published in Eurasia Review. She can be reached at [email protected]

Image Source: Larson, Celeb. Chinese Engineers Shot Down a Large Drone Using Electromagnetic Pulse.The National Interest. August 29, 2021.


Share this article

Facebook
Twitter
LinkedIn

Recent Publications

Browse through the list of recent publications.

The US-Israel War on Iran: Objectives, Strategy, and Escalation Management

Zahra Niazi
‘States tend to overestimate themselves or the benefits and swiftness of war, and to underestimate their opponents’ capabilities, intentions, or the costs and duration of war.’ If anything, the 2026 war initiated by the United States and Israel against Iran shall be remembered in the annals of warfare among the most visible manifestations of this dynamic.
The war, immediately preceded by the January mass protests in Iran, did not represent a sudden rupture but rather the continuation of a 47-year-long confrontation and a more intense phase of the June 2025 war.
The US Secretary of War, Pete Hegseth, defined the war’s objectives as being laser-focused: to destroy Iran’s missile capabilities and its security infrastructure, while ensuring that it could never develop nuclear weapons. Beyond these stated objectives, among the priorities on the continuum also lay the objective of regime change, with both President Trump and Prime Minister Netanyahu explicitly calling on the Iranian population to take over the government at the outset of the war.

Read More »

Marka-e-Haq to the Peace Talks: Pakistan’s Middle Power Status

On 7th May 2025, Pakistan’s military forces took the international security community by surprise when it demonstrated operational superiority against its larger belligerent adversary India with its rapid and coordinated response. The Four-Day conflict proved to be a watershed moment for Pakistan, marking its rapid emergence as an important player in the region. In recent years, amidst the ongoing global competition between the United States and China, Islamabad has adopted a position of ’Strategic Balancing,’ where it maintains ties of cooperation with both Beijing and Washington. Deft diplomacy, emphasis on geo-economics, and credible conventional and strategic deterrence have remained the foundational pillars for Pakistan’s ambition as a rising middle power

Read More »

Debunking the S-400 Shield: Lessons from the India-Pakistan Conflict

Air defense has always been a central aspect of warfare. In South Asia, the phenomenon carries immense significance due to compressed reaction times. In this context, one of the most-hyped systems is the Russian-made S-400, touted by New Delhi as a one-stop solution to counter aerial threats from both Pakistan and China.
The 2025 conflict between India and Pakistan marked an important chapter in testing the S-400 technology. The conflict began on May 7, when India attacked what it alleged were terrorist targets in both Pakistani-held Kashmir and Pakistan proper, using drone and missile strikes. The conflict lasted for four days, culminating in a U.S-facilitated ceasefire. However, the brief conflict debunked a lot of the myths regarding the S-400 technology.
First, India claimed that the mobile S-400 would be able to control Pakistan’s airspace. In contrast, Pakistani aircraft continued to operate freely, according to official briefings by the Pakistani military. Although the Pakistan Air Force (PAF) aircraft were in their own airspace, they were still within the air defense range.

Read More »