Presentation1_(1)

Since the end of Cold War, most wars have taken place either in the Middle East or the adjacent South Asian region. Unfortunately, all of these wars and conflicts were between the Unequal Military Powers (UMPs), and therefore, the result was obvious. The infrastructure and the social fabric of Iraq, Libya, Syria, Yemen, and Afghanistan has been destroyed, and hundreds of thousands of innocent people killed, while millions have been rendered homeless and forced to leave their homes to take refuge in foreign lands.

Iran, on the other hand, remains under US sanctions due to its nuclear programme which not only concerns extra-regional powers but also regional states. Saudi Arabia has repeatedly voiced its concerns about increased nuclear activities by Iran which threatens regional security. Saudi officials have stated that “Iran’s moves to produce uranium enriched to 60% fissile purity and uranium metal to 20% ‘represent an increasing threat’ to regional security and non-proliferation of weapons.” According to a recently published International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA) report on Iran, the country is producing more Uranium metal in violation of its commitment under the Joint Comprehensive Plan of Action (JCPOA). This is hampering efforts to secure “a comprehensive nuclear deal that ensures global and regional security and stability.”

The situation in the region, Middle East and South Asia (MESA), calls for comprehensive intra-regional dialogue, perhaps at the Summit level.

Afghanistan remains under the clouds of uncertainty in spite of the complete withdrawal of foreign forces. In fact, one may recall that the US signed a Peace Agreement with Taliban in Doha on 29 February 2020, under which all its forces were supposed to withdraw from Afghanistan in 14 months. However, President Biden sought a little more time to complete the process and finally all US and NATO troops left Afghanistan by middle of August, and Taliban entered Kabul without firing a shot on 15 August 2021. Though not an unexpected outcome, it is taking a little more time than expected for regional as well as extra-regional countries to recognize the new Afghan government led by Taliban. This is unfair for the people of Afghanistan who have already suffered immensely due to repeated foreign occupations and continued wars and conflicts over the last four decades. Delay in recognition is especially problematic since the US leadership (and that of other countries) should have foreseen that Taliban would ultimately take over Afghanistan after foreign troops left the country they had controlled by force only.

The people of Afghanistan are starving due to lack of basic amenities which are not available to them due to absence of requisite resources. In spite of Pakistan’s best efforts to provide humanitarian assistance in the form of food and medicines, Afghans are going through a appalling time due to extremely harsh weather and lack of international support at this critical time. The new Taliban government does not have enough resources to manage the state’s affairs due to US restrictions on the release of funds necessary to provide relief to the people of Afghanistan. Perhaps, the US Administration is taking revenge of its military defeat from the Taliban government without any consideration for the plight of the people of Afghanistan for which the US cannot be absolved under any pretext.

Moving to the Middle East, the war in Yemen has entered its 8th year. Yemen, like Syria, is a classic example of a civil war turning into a larger regional conflict. Without going into the historical past of Yemen’s civil war, the ongoing military conflict started in 2014 when Saudi-led regional forces intervened to reinstall the government of Abdrabbuh Mansur Hadi who had fled out of Yemen due to resurgent Houthi’s advances on the capital Sana. Although the Saudi-led offensive achieved its primary objective of restoring Hadi’s government, but the conflict developed into full-scale war. The people of Yemen are now faced with famine and large-scale internal displacement and the end of the crisis is not in sight. Houthis have been carrying out missile and rocket attacks on Saudi oil facilities regularly but on 17th January, they claim to have carried out a drone strike against oil facilities near Abu Dhabi. Not surprisingly, UAE has pledged to retaliate in kind.

While Libya remains unstable, there is no respite for the Syrians also. Growing out of the consequences of the Arab Spring in early 2011, the Syrian conflict has had a much wider impact on regional security. The number of regional and extra-regional states and non-state actors involved in the Syrian conflict, perhaps outnumbers all other regional conflicts, including Libya, Yemen, and even Afghanistan. That is why the Syrian conflict remains unresolved even after continued fighting for over a decade now.

The challenges to regional security in the MESA region are of serious nature and need to be looked into at the Summit level. Regional stakeholders must take charge before extra-regional forces intervene again militarily, especially since their political intervention is unlikely to be blocked due to their long-term interest in the region.

Key Words: Middle East, Afghanistan, Iran, South Asia, Security

Dr Zia Ul Haque Shamsi is the author of  ‘Nuclear Deterrence and Conflict Management Between India and Pakistan’ (2020) and ‘South Asia Needs Hybrid Peace’ (2021). He is presently working as Director at the Centre for Aerospace & Security Studies (CASS), Islamabad, Pakistan. The article was first published in Daily Times. He can be reached at [email protected].

Image Source: Etfa Khurshid Mirza


Share this article

Facebook
Twitter
LinkedIn

Recent Publications

Browse through the list of recent publications.

The Cover-up: IAF Narrative of the May 2025 Air Battle

Even after one year since the India-Pakistan May war of 2025, the Indian discourse regarding Operation Sindoor remains uncertain under its pretence of restraint. The Pahalgam attack on 22 April, which killed 26 people, triggered an escalatory spiral. New Delhi quickly accused Pakistan-linked elements, while Islamabad refuted the allegation and demanded an independent investigation. On 7 May, India launched attacks deep inside Pakistan under what it later termed as Operation Sindoor. The political motive was intended to turn the crisis into coercive signalling by shifting the blame onto the enemy and projecting a sense of military superiority.
This episode, however, began to fray immediately as war seldom follows the intended script. Within minutes PAF shot down 7 IAF aircraft including 4 Rafales. On 8 May, Reuters reported that at least two Indian aircraft were shot down by a Pakistani J-10C, while the local government sources reported other aircraft crashes in Indian-occupied Jammu and Kashmir

Read More »

Why the IAF’s Post-Sindoor Spending Surge is a Sign of Panic

After Operation Sindoor, India is spending billions of dollars on new weapons. This is being taken by many people as an indication of military prowess. It is not. This rush to procure weapons is in fact an acknowledgement that the Air Force in India had failed to do what it was meant to do. The costly jets and missiles that India had purchased over the years failed to yield the promised results.

Sindoor was soon followed by India in sealing the gaps which the operation had exposed. It was reported that Indian Air Force (IAF) is looking to speed up its purchases of more than 7 billion USD. This will involve other Rafale fighter jets with India already ordering 26 more Rafales to the Navy in 2024 at an estimated cost of about 3.9 billion USD. India is also seeking long-range standoff missiles, Israeli loitering munitions and increased drone capabilities. Special financial powers of the Indian military were activated to issue emergency procurement orders. The magnitude and rate of these purchases speak volumes.

Indian media and defence analysts have over the years considered the Rafale as a game changer. When India purchased 36 Rafales aircrafts at an approximate cost of 8.7 billion USD, analysts vowed that the aircraft would provide India with air superiority over Pakistan. Operation Sindoor disproved all those allegations. Indian aircraft did not even fly in Pakistani airspace when the fighting started. India solely depended on standoff weapons that were launched at a safe distance. The air defence system of Pakistan, comprising of the HQ-9 surface-to-air missile system and its own fighters, stood its ground.

Read More »

May 2025: Mosaic Warfare and the Myth of Centralised Air Power

Visualise a modern-day Air Force commander sitting in the operations room, miles away from the combat zone, overseeing every friendly and enemy aircraft and all assets involved in the campaign. In a split second, he can task a fighter, reposition a drone, and authorise a strike. In today’s promising technological era, he does not even need an operations room; a laptop on his desktop will suffice. The situation looks promising as it offers efficiency, precision, and control. The term used for such operational control is ‘centralisation’, which has been made possible with advanced networking, integrating space, cyber, surveillance, artificial intelligence, and seamless communication, enabling a single commander to manage an entire campaign from a single node. Centralised command and control, championed by the Western air forces and then adopted by many others, has thus been seen as a pinnacle of modern military power.
The concept of centralisation, enabled by state-of-the-art networking, may seem promising, but it is nothing more than a myth.

Read More »