Boomerang

The manner in which the policies of the US central bank (Fed) have decimated the global economy over the past year is not just evident from the developing economies that have been destroyed (Sri Lanka, Lebanon) or paralyzed (Pakistan, Peru), but also in the damage to the American economy itself, which is best exemplified by the collapse of three separate banks during March 2023, and perhaps more to come. So it is no longer a question of what the Fed is doing to Third World countries on distant shores, but of how Fed policies have swiftly boomeranged to unbalance the American financial system itself.

Three American banks and a fourth one in Switzerland fell in quick succession because of the Fed’s misjudged and hard-swinging monetary contraction in 2022, with interest rates going from near 0% to almost 6% in less than a year. The first domino to fall was Silicon Valley Bank (SVB), which lost its bearings due to the panic generated by its duration mismatch. Since it had invested in old bonds that paid low interest rates, new bond issuances at high rates became much more attractive and sank the value of its existing bond holdings, leading scared depositors to pull out as rumors spread of its unbalanced fixed income exposure. 

The second bank to tumble was Signature Bank, which fell because of similar concerns, while a third bank named Silvergate was also affected by all this as well as by its undue exposure to cryptocurrencies, which fell along with traditional asset classes (like equities) after the Fed raised rates and money went into treasuries. A fourth Swiss bank, the giant Credit Suisse, collapsed as contagion and fear spread beyond the US, and the latent problems of the bank came into the spotlight, forcing Swiss authorities to impose its acquisition by another bank.

Looking at these bank failures in a local context belies, however, the global problem caused by the Fed, which must be viewed in the big picture where it pertains to both the toxic-asset problem in the American economy and its crony capitalism that is held behind a very thin veneer. After two decades of excessively loose monetary policy in the period 1990-2007 (the Greenspan era), for which the Fed received generous praise from the Wall Street crowd, things came to an abrupt halt in 2008, when the subprime mortgage problem grew too large due to Wall Street corruption.

The Fed at the time injected a massive dose of morphine into the system through quantitative easing (monetary stimulus), which patched up the problem for a while, but it did not address the roots of economic dysfunction in America: financial lobbying, a revolving door between Washington and Wall Street, and growing inequality due to underinvestment in the public good. But the Fed was enjoying the accolades, and the man who spearheaded the 2008 rescue stimulus even received the Nobel Prize in Economics (Ben Bernanke). It therefore didn’t tighten monetary conditions because the ride was too good, and because American elites did not want to face up to the actual erosion within the underbelly of the economy.

When the Covid-19 pandemic hit in 2020, therefore, the Fed was still too happy enjoying the buzz of the 2008 morphine, and administered yet another dose of morphine ten times larger than the previous one. If it hadn’t done so, the Fed argued, the economy would have faced more devastation than any war might have unleashed (as former Fed chairman Yellen has warned). The bigger 2020 morphine dose of quantitative easing was also, however, a mere sedative that did nothing to remedy the structural issues that had festered in the American economy. In fact, much of the stimulus went to large corporations rather than to desperate households!

It was an elite nomenklatura that captured too much of the stimulus, with trinkets thrown (the $600 stimulus cheques) at the public. The trinkets themselves did not necessarily go into the right end uses either, and much cash flowed through retail investments in stocks, cryptocurrencies, a new housing market bubble, NFTs (a whimsical digital asset), and other eccentric collectibles. The American stock market was up, even as the economy was down. As such, two massive morphine doses over 15 years, and the Fed somehow thought the withdrawal systems would be mild. “Transitory inflation,” it said in 2021, not realizing that all this morphine was going to need flushing out of the poisoned veins of American capitalism. 

When the Fed realized how off-the-mark it was, inflation had already taken a galloping speed post-Covid. The Fed thus reacted with equally irresponsible timing by shooting up interest rates at the fastest rate in history (2022). This led to massive reverberations throughout the American economy, with the stock market, housing market, cryptocurrency market, and just about all markets collapsing simultaneously in 2022. In 2023, it also led to devastation in the American banking system, including the collapse of SVB and Signature ban. A great deal of fictional wealth was eroded in a brief time span, as shock therapy was being applied to the morphine addict. The worst affected, however, were the developing countries, which witnessed massive capital outflows (Egypt being a strong case in point), along with fiscal imbalances, political instability, and commodity shortfalls.Yet one now sees the boomerang returning from the developing world back to the United States.

Over the past year, American economic pundits were largely unmoved as a large swathe of developing countries were being devastated by the monumental incompetence of the US Fed. In Karmic retribution, it is now of immediate concern to the very same authorities, and the Fed may have to reverse course at a time when its already low credibility is hinging on the continuity of its interest rate hikes to anchor market expectations. Now those pundits can worry about something closer to home.

Dr. Usman W. Chohan is Advisor (Economic Affairs and National Development) at the Centre for Aerospace & Security Studies, Islamabad, Pakistan. He can be reached at [email protected]


Share this article

Facebook
Twitter
LinkedIn

Recent Publications

Browse through the list of recent publications.

The Cover-up: IAF Narrative of the May 2025 Air Battle

Even after one year since the India-Pakistan May war of 2025, the Indian discourse regarding Operation Sindoor remains uncertain under its pretence of restraint. The Pahalgam attack on 22 April, which killed 26 people, triggered an escalatory spiral. New Delhi quickly accused Pakistan-linked elements, while Islamabad refuted the allegation and demanded an independent investigation. On 7 May, India launched attacks deep inside Pakistan under what it later termed as Operation Sindoor. The political motive was intended to turn the crisis into coercive signalling by shifting the blame onto the enemy and projecting a sense of military superiority.
This episode, however, began to fray immediately as war seldom follows the intended script. Within minutes PAF shot down 7 IAF aircraft including 4 Rafales. On 8 May, Reuters reported that at least two Indian aircraft were shot down by a Pakistani J-10C, while the local government sources reported other aircraft crashes in Indian-occupied Jammu and Kashmir

Read More »

Why the IAF’s Post-Sindoor Spending Surge is a Sign of Panic

After Operation Sindoor, India is spending billions of dollars on new weapons. This is being taken by many people as an indication of military prowess. It is not. This rush to procure weapons is in fact an acknowledgement that the Air Force in India had failed to do what it was meant to do. The costly jets and missiles that India had purchased over the years failed to yield the promised results.

Sindoor was soon followed by India in sealing the gaps which the operation had exposed. It was reported that Indian Air Force (IAF) is looking to speed up its purchases of more than 7 billion USD. This will involve other Rafale fighter jets with India already ordering 26 more Rafales to the Navy in 2024 at an estimated cost of about 3.9 billion USD. India is also seeking long-range standoff missiles, Israeli loitering munitions and increased drone capabilities. Special financial powers of the Indian military were activated to issue emergency procurement orders. The magnitude and rate of these purchases speak volumes.

Indian media and defence analysts have over the years considered the Rafale as a game changer. When India purchased 36 Rafales aircrafts at an approximate cost of 8.7 billion USD, analysts vowed that the aircraft would provide India with air superiority over Pakistan. Operation Sindoor disproved all those allegations. Indian aircraft did not even fly in Pakistani airspace when the fighting started. India solely depended on standoff weapons that were launched at a safe distance. The air defence system of Pakistan, comprising of the HQ-9 surface-to-air missile system and its own fighters, stood its ground.

Read More »

May 2025: Mosaic Warfare and the Myth of Centralised Air Power

Visualise a modern-day Air Force commander sitting in the operations room, miles away from the combat zone, overseeing every friendly and enemy aircraft and all assets involved in the campaign. In a split second, he can task a fighter, reposition a drone, and authorise a strike. In today’s promising technological era, he does not even need an operations room; a laptop on his desktop will suffice. The situation looks promising as it offers efficiency, precision, and control. The term used for such operational control is ‘centralisation’, which has been made possible with advanced networking, integrating space, cyber, surveillance, artificial intelligence, and seamless communication, enabling a single commander to manage an entire campaign from a single node. Centralised command and control, championed by the Western air forces and then adopted by many others, has thus been seen as a pinnacle of modern military power.
The concept of centralisation, enabled by state-of-the-art networking, may seem promising, but it is nothing more than a myth.

Read More »