OA Deepening Islamophobia in India July 2023 - Website Thumbnail

Around two hundred million Muslims call India their home; but unfortunately, Modi’s India considers them bearded traitors and state enemies. Islamophobia is not a new phenomenon; however, its growing roots under Modi’s rule lie in the Hindutva ideology which promotes the notion of India for ‘Hindus only’ and deems other religious minorities as outsiders because of their alleged extraterritorial loyalties to other lands, mainly the Arab world. The ideology fuels a social divide depicting the hegemony of Hinduism in India where Muslims are regarded as instigators of terror and suspicion, ultimately widening the rift between the two communities. 

During his recent state visit to the United States (US), Narendra Modi was bombarded with questions about the state-sponsored hatred against Muslims and abuse of their rights. However, he unashamedly denied all allegations of any wrong-doing despite damning evidence to the contrary. During the press briefing, he was asked about implementing necessary measures to improve the rights of the Muslim community and minorities. Ironically, he suggested that there was no need to address the human rights situation in his country as India was a democratic state and they had ‘proved democracy can deliver. When I say deliver, regardless of caste, creed, religion, gender – there is absolutely no space for any discrimination (in my government).’ 

However, in ‘democratic India’, the Muslim community continues to face systemic discrimination and fall prey to acts of violence committed by state-backed gangs of Hindu extremists. Anti-Muslim hostility has surged, and consequently, Muslim men are routinely beaten up by right-wing Hindu extremists, Muslim women are raped and children molested.

The US State Department’s annual Report on International Religious Freedom 2022 has called out several countries, including India, for continuously targeting members from certain faith communities. It highlights numerous concerns regarding religious freedom in India such as regular attacks on Muslims, prohibition on religious conversion, and cow vigilantism.

On the occasion of Eid-ul-Adha, a Muslim man named Afan Abdul Ansari was lynched by cow vigilantes in Maharashtra on the pretext of carrying meat. According to press reports, Afan was brutally assaulted with rods, pipes, and shoes for nearly three hours. The attackers fled after dumping his body on the highway. Another man named Lukman Ansari was also attacked on suspicion of illegally transporting cattle.

According to a new study on rising Islamophobia in the digital age by the Islamic Council of Victoria (ICV) 2022 nearly four million Islamophobic tweets were posted on Twitter between 2017 and 2021. Of these, 55.12% of anti-Muslim hate tweets originated in India. The report observed that India’s ruling Bharatiya Janata Party (BJP) was responsible for disseminating and amplifying prejudice and intolerance towards Muslims.

Besides, some staged videos reinforcing negative stereotypes about Muslims in India are frequently posted on Facebook and YouTube by Indian bloggers, many of whom are accused of peddling false information, inciting hatred, and fanning sectarian tensions in society. These videos depict Muslims as low-life swindlers who cheat and trick innocent people while Hindus are shown as the utmost responsible citizens of the country. Such videos have millions of views and are often included in campaign videos in order to economically marginalise and boycott Muslims. According to the renowned Indian Journalist Rana Ayub, anti-Muslim hate rallies are a new norm in India where Hindu extremists taunt Muslims to choose between Pakistan or Qabristan (graveyard) thus, inciting violence and enflaming hatred while leaving no room for them to lead a life of honor and dignity in India.     

A few sane voices in India are calling out their government for its retrogressive and violent policies against Muslims. Sadly, these voices are often muffled by the State apparatus through any and all means possible. Thus, it rests upon the international community to take practical steps for upholding basic human rights in India. Till now, governments around the globe have not gone beyond rhetoric measures to address this issue; so-called national interests have unfortunately triumphed over universal human values. And if this trend continues, India would spiral into an abyss of communal hatred, social violence and fanaticism from which there may be no easy escape.

Javaria Nisar is a Research Assistant at the Centre for Aerospace & Security Studies (CASS), Islamabad, Pakistan. She can be reached at [email protected].


Share this article

Facebook
Twitter
LinkedIn

Recent Publications

Browse through the list of recent publications.

The Cover-up: IAF Narrative of the May 2025 Air Battle

Even after one year since the India-Pakistan May war of 2025, the Indian discourse regarding Operation Sindoor remains uncertain under its pretence of restraint. The Pahalgam attack on 22 April, which killed 26 people, triggered an escalatory spiral. New Delhi quickly accused Pakistan-linked elements, while Islamabad refuted the allegation and demanded an independent investigation. On 7 May, India launched attacks deep inside Pakistan under what it later termed as Operation Sindoor. The political motive was intended to turn the crisis into coercive signalling by shifting the blame onto the enemy and projecting a sense of military superiority.
This episode, however, began to fray immediately as war seldom follows the intended script. Within minutes PAF shot down 7 IAF aircraft including 4 Rafales. On 8 May, Reuters reported that at least two Indian aircraft were shot down by a Pakistani J-10C, while the local government sources reported other aircraft crashes in Indian-occupied Jammu and Kashmir

Read More »

Why the IAF’s Post-Sindoor Spending Surge is a Sign of Panic

After Operation Sindoor, India is spending billions of dollars on new weapons. This is being taken by many people as an indication of military prowess. It is not. This rush to procure weapons is in fact an acknowledgement that the Air Force in India had failed to do what it was meant to do. The costly jets and missiles that India had purchased over the years failed to yield the promised results.

Sindoor was soon followed by India in sealing the gaps which the operation had exposed. It was reported that Indian Air Force (IAF) is looking to speed up its purchases of more than 7 billion USD. This will involve other Rafale fighter jets with India already ordering 26 more Rafales to the Navy in 2024 at an estimated cost of about 3.9 billion USD. India is also seeking long-range standoff missiles, Israeli loitering munitions and increased drone capabilities. Special financial powers of the Indian military were activated to issue emergency procurement orders. The magnitude and rate of these purchases speak volumes.

Indian media and defence analysts have over the years considered the Rafale as a game changer. When India purchased 36 Rafales aircrafts at an approximate cost of 8.7 billion USD, analysts vowed that the aircraft would provide India with air superiority over Pakistan. Operation Sindoor disproved all those allegations. Indian aircraft did not even fly in Pakistani airspace when the fighting started. India solely depended on standoff weapons that were launched at a safe distance. The air defence system of Pakistan, comprising of the HQ-9 surface-to-air missile system and its own fighters, stood its ground.

Read More »

May 2025: Mosaic Warfare and the Myth of Centralised Air Power

Visualise a modern-day Air Force commander sitting in the operations room, miles away from the combat zone, overseeing every friendly and enemy aircraft and all assets involved in the campaign. In a split second, he can task a fighter, reposition a drone, and authorise a strike. In today’s promising technological era, he does not even need an operations room; a laptop on his desktop will suffice. The situation looks promising as it offers efficiency, precision, and control. The term used for such operational control is ‘centralisation’, which has been made possible with advanced networking, integrating space, cyber, surveillance, artificial intelligence, and seamless communication, enabling a single commander to manage an entire campaign from a single node. Centralised command and control, championed by the Western air forces and then adopted by many others, has thus been seen as a pinnacle of modern military power.
The concept of centralisation, enabled by state-of-the-art networking, may seem promising, but it is nothing more than a myth.

Read More »