BRI

The year 2023 marks the 10th anniversary of China’s Belt and Road Initiative (BRI), also known as the ‘One Belt One Road’ (OBOR), or the New Silk Road, launched by Chinese President Xi Jinping in 2013. The BRI has since then continued to evolve from vision into reality, boosting investments in partner countries. China’s recent agreements with the Philippines and Turkmenistan on regional cooperation at the onset of the year 2023 remain a clear manifestation that BRI is not only in line with its strategy of economic cooperation but also continues to bring new development opportunities to the world amid evolving global order. However, the passing decade of the BRI merits brief evaluation concerning its significance, achievements and the hurdles it faced.

China considers opening up to the world as its fundamental policy designed to safeguard its independence and territorial integrity, and also promote world peace and common development. The BRI, being an integral part of the policy, is an expansive venture aimed at fostering economic cooperation and regional connectivity through infrastructure development. Meanwhile, the BRI also incorporates development activities in other sectors, including the promotion of cross-cultural exchange, health and technology etc. Modelled after the ancient Silk Road, which established a conduit between China and other nations, fostering commercial and cultural exchange, the BRI’s primary objective is to construct an extensive network of infrastructure development that includes transportation, energy and mining projects, railways, highways, ports, airports, and pipelines, connecting China to numerous countries in Asia, Europe, and Africa. The BRI helps China in cultivating a more extensive and mutually reliant marketplace, establishing an enabling environment for the development of a sophisticated technological economy and augmenting the country’s economic and political influence.

In this regard, several indicators on the BRI represent a success story. Today, the project is covering two-thirds of the countries and one-third of international organisations in the world. China’s Foreign Direct Investment (FDI) was USD 154 billion in 2020, making the country the largest overseas investor. By May 2022, the aggregate of non-financial direct investment between China and the BRI participant nations exceeded USD 140 billion. Meanwhile, China’s trade in goods with the BRI nations amounted to Yuan 11.6 trillion in 2021, representing a year-on-year increase of 23.6%. The BRI has also been improving livelihoods through poverty reduction programmes and healthcare initiatives, among others in several developing countries.

In terms of projects, two leading projects under the BRI stand out, including the China-Europe express railway and the China-Pakistan Economic Corridor (CPEC). Given the significant emphasis on transport and logistic services, the China-Europe freight train achieved a milestone in 2021 with 15,000 trips – a remarkable increase of 22% from the previous year. The transportation service delivered an impressive volume of goods amounting to 1.46 million TEU containers – reflecting an outstanding growth rate of 29%. This success is credited to its vast network that spans across European cities with 78 operational lines, making it easier for over fifty thousand types of products to be transported efficiently. With this well-established logistics distribution system in place throughout Eurasia, several other infrastructure projects, such as Hungary-Serbia Railway and China-Laos Railway are advancing positively.

CPEC, the USD 50 billion worth flagship project of the BRI, was initiated in 2013. The CPEC framework aims at economically connecting Pakistan not only with China but also with Central Asian Republics (CARs) and the Eurasian region. It includes energy installations, transport infrastructure, the port of Gwadar and the development of industrial cooperation. Though there have been hiccups, both China and Pakistan largely express satisfaction over the completion of projects, and hope that the CPEC would help the latter in strengthening national development and, most importantly, benefiting local people.

Though the aforementioned indicators paint an optimistic image of BRI implementation, it has faced several challenges and risks. There are reports that indicate that 35% of infrastructure projects under BRI confronted significant issues. The initiative has also garnered opposition from some countries who view the loans offered for infrastructure upgrades as a potential burden due to opaque bidding processes and inflated costs. These concerns have resulted in cancelled projects and political backlash. Additionally, non-renewable energy investment has made up nearly half of all BRI spending, leading to climate change concerns.

On the geopolitical front, meanwhile, the US’ strategic competition with China may also have a slowing down impact on the BRI. The Obama administration’s ‘Pivot to Asia’ and the Trump administration’s ‘BUILD Act’ were focused on infrastructure development and cooperation among low-income countries. In 2021, President Joe Biden launched the ‘Build Back Better World Initiative (B3W)’, along with G7 member nations, as a programme for investment in infrastructure aimed at competing against BRI. India is also apprehensive about the BRI. It has been cautioning other countries about China’s so-called geoeconomic ‘tactics’ to create unsustainable debt burdens and seize control of regional choke points. India has been opposed to CPEC as well since it will strengthen Pakistan economically and politically – an outcome that does not align with New Delhi’s interests given their longstanding rivalry. Besides opposition, the US and India continue to disseminate negative media propaganda against the BRI to undermine its significance and acceptance.

Though the aforementioned challenges do suggest potential hurdles for China to sustain and expand the BRI, its smooth sailing over the last decade demonstrates successful implementation of the project. Moreover, Beijing’s efforts to address debt burden concerns of the BRI nations and resolve international debt issues would further build confidence in the initiative and Chinese measures. Long-term success internationally would also rely on Chinese compliance with green development principles, digital infrastructure advancements, and technological innovations. Domestically, China needs to integrate the BRI with inland priorities, particularly the development of Xinjiang and its western region.

Moiz Khan is a Research Assistant at the Centre for Aerospace & Security Studies (CASS), Islamabad, Pakistan. He can be reached at [email protected]


Share this article

Facebook
Twitter
LinkedIn

Recent Publications

Browse through the list of recent publications.

The US-Israel War on Iran: Objectives, Strategy, and Escalation Management

Zahra Niazi
‘States tend to overestimate themselves or the benefits and swiftness of war, and to underestimate their opponents’ capabilities, intentions, or the costs and duration of war.’ If anything, the 2026 war initiated by the United States and Israel against Iran shall be remembered in the annals of warfare among the most visible manifestations of this dynamic.
The war, immediately preceded by the January mass protests in Iran, did not represent a sudden rupture but rather the continuation of a 47-year-long confrontation and a more intense phase of the June 2025 war.
The US Secretary of War, Pete Hegseth, defined the war’s objectives as being laser-focused: to destroy Iran’s missile capabilities and its security infrastructure, while ensuring that it could never develop nuclear weapons. Beyond these stated objectives, among the priorities on the continuum also lay the objective of regime change, with both President Trump and Prime Minister Netanyahu explicitly calling on the Iranian population to take over the government at the outset of the war.

Read More »

Marka-e-Haq to the Peace Talks: Pakistan’s Middle Power Status

On 7th May 2025, Pakistan’s military forces took the international security community by surprise when it demonstrated operational superiority against its larger belligerent adversary India with its rapid and coordinated response. The Four-Day conflict proved to be a watershed moment for Pakistan, marking its rapid emergence as an important player in the region. In recent years, amidst the ongoing global competition between the United States and China, Islamabad has adopted a position of ’Strategic Balancing,’ where it maintains ties of cooperation with both Beijing and Washington. Deft diplomacy, emphasis on geo-economics, and credible conventional and strategic deterrence have remained the foundational pillars for Pakistan’s ambition as a rising middle power

Read More »

Debunking the S-400 Shield: Lessons from the India-Pakistan Conflict

Air defense has always been a central aspect of warfare. In South Asia, the phenomenon carries immense significance due to compressed reaction times. In this context, one of the most-hyped systems is the Russian-made S-400, touted by New Delhi as a one-stop solution to counter aerial threats from both Pakistan and China.
The 2025 conflict between India and Pakistan marked an important chapter in testing the S-400 technology. The conflict began on May 7, when India attacked what it alleged were terrorist targets in both Pakistani-held Kashmir and Pakistan proper, using drone and missile strikes. The conflict lasted for four days, culminating in a U.S-facilitated ceasefire. However, the brief conflict debunked a lot of the myths regarding the S-400 technology.
First, India claimed that the mobile S-400 would be able to control Pakistan’s airspace. In contrast, Pakistani aircraft continued to operate freely, according to official briefings by the Pakistani military. Although the Pakistan Air Force (PAF) aircraft were in their own airspace, they were still within the air defense range.

Read More »