Image_for_aviation_article

The ancient Silk Route, originating as far back as 200 BC, has a historic and cultural importance for the Asian Region. China is devoted to reviving the ancient Silk Route in the form of the Belt Road Initiative (BRI). Although the BRI is based on land and maritime trade routes, there is also a “sky route” that is commonly referred to as Aviation Silk Route (ASR).
Specifically, the ASR comprises the aerospace infrastructure being developed as part of Belt Road Initiative. The ASR has however drawn lesser attention than it deserves. It is one of the building blocks and an air bridge integrated into the larger BRI architecture aimed to compliment the maritime and road silk routes. But as modernized connectivity is scaling new heights, the Aviatic Silk Road should not be sidelined.
The International Air Transport Association (IATA) predicts that the next decade of economic growth and stable fuel prices will drive industrial and cargo growth by an exponential rate. On a similar note, World Airport Economic Report 2019 affirms that air transport demand will rise from the developing economies especially from the South Asian and Asia Pacific region. Based on predictions of various aviation sector experts, a link between fuel prices, robust industrial performance, global trade and cargo will demand connected infrastructure of airports in the region.
China has signed over 50 projects directed towards building aviation projects with some connection to the BRI. To facilitate the projects, bilateral air transport agreements between China and 60 countries have been initiated (even with non-member countries). Around 43 of these countries already have airlines departing and arriving to and from China.
Significantly the ASR is tilted towards regional development, and then extended towards the world. Asian, European and African regions are the priority of BRI’s Aviatic Silk Road.
In 2018, CAPA – Centre for Aviation’s Airport Construction Database, gathered the data on the Chinese investments on airports in BRI participating countries. According to the database, China has invested in building the ASR in Central Asian States, at the crossroads of Europe, along the maritime route in the Indian Ocean, as well as on strategically significant locations on the African continent.
Specifically, in Central Asia, six projects in Kazakhstan are underway that cover airport reconstruction and cargo terminals. Four airport projects in Kyrgyzstan that are scheduled for completion in 2022. These projects lay emphasis on reconstruction of terminals and their expansion projects. Uzbekistan is also at a similar page with two airport upgrade projects in process. In Tajikistan, the focus is on the construction of new freight terminal for cargo.
On the European end, ASR is concentrated more so in the Eastern Europe region. New Istanbul Airport in Turkey shall serve as one of the major airports on the BRI. It is considered a bridge between two major trading continents. Another airport that China has invested in is Belarus, where one significant airport infrastructure is under construction. Chinese investment for ASR is also eyeing Georgia for trans-continental connectivity.
South Asian states can also become major participants of the ASR. For example, Sri Lanka is receiving generous investment from the Chinese, and its second international airport will serve as a significant point of connectivity.
In Pakistan, Chinese investment is directed towards Gwadar International Airport, encompassed within China Pakistan Economic Corridor project. The airport is located on the southern tip of the country sliding into the Persian Gulf and Indian Ocean, making it a useful connecting zone between the Middle East and Asia.
In addition, the PAF’s Aviation City at Kamra also offers a useful location for establishing a linkage with the ASR, as a large amount of investment is going to be made to strengthen the Aeronautical Complex’s existing industrial capabilities, and an aerotropolis model can be deployed here.
According to the 13th Five-Year Plan, general airports within mainland China will reach 740 in next ten years, stated the chief strategist of Guangdong Longhao Aviation Group. These significant airport reconstructions, renovations, freight terminal construction as well as new airport projects designed under ASR, will enhance connectivity infrastructure not only within the region but also provide a route for the Global South to integrate its local economies with the Global North.
Nonetheless, Aviatic Silk Road is not free of some hurdles in turning the vision into reality.
Firstly, a turbulent security environment can cause unwanted delays in the projects.
Secondly, a lack of cooperation among stakeholders, and vested national interests can challenge the durability of the Aviatic Silk Road. Thirdly, due to low connectivity within the region, it can be challenging to break the ice of trust between some countries (particularly in Central Asia). Lastly, a lack of government initiative can delay the potential for taking advantage of the ASR.
However, ASR is an opportunity of South-South cooperation. As the neoliberal era has pushed countries towards interdependence, it is important to keep pace with this advancement. Aviatic Silk Road can serve as an air bridge connecting the same regions that the BRI route shall connect by land. This is a leap forward in development not only targeted for a specific group of countries but rather for several continents together.
 

The writer is a research fellow at Centre for Aerospace and Security Studies. This article was first published in DailyNHT newspaper. She can be reached at [email protected].


Share this article

Facebook
Twitter
LinkedIn

Recent Publications

Browse through the list of recent publications.

The US-Israel War on Iran: Objectives, Strategy, and Escalation Management

Zahra Niazi
‘States tend to overestimate themselves or the benefits and swiftness of war, and to underestimate their opponents’ capabilities, intentions, or the costs and duration of war.’ If anything, the 2026 war initiated by the United States and Israel against Iran shall be remembered in the annals of warfare among the most visible manifestations of this dynamic.
The war, immediately preceded by the January mass protests in Iran, did not represent a sudden rupture but rather the continuation of a 47-year-long confrontation and a more intense phase of the June 2025 war.
The US Secretary of War, Pete Hegseth, defined the war’s objectives as being laser-focused: to destroy Iran’s missile capabilities and its security infrastructure, while ensuring that it could never develop nuclear weapons. Beyond these stated objectives, among the priorities on the continuum also lay the objective of regime change, with both President Trump and Prime Minister Netanyahu explicitly calling on the Iranian population to take over the government at the outset of the war.

Read More »

Marka-e-Haq to the Peace Talks: Pakistan’s Middle Power Status

On 7th May 2025, Pakistan’s military forces took the international security community by surprise when it demonstrated operational superiority against its larger belligerent adversary India with its rapid and coordinated response. The Four-Day conflict proved to be a watershed moment for Pakistan, marking its rapid emergence as an important player in the region. In recent years, amidst the ongoing global competition between the United States and China, Islamabad has adopted a position of ’Strategic Balancing,’ where it maintains ties of cooperation with both Beijing and Washington. Deft diplomacy, emphasis on geo-economics, and credible conventional and strategic deterrence have remained the foundational pillars for Pakistan’s ambition as a rising middle power

Read More »

Debunking the S-400 Shield: Lessons from the India-Pakistan Conflict

Air defense has always been a central aspect of warfare. In South Asia, the phenomenon carries immense significance due to compressed reaction times. In this context, one of the most-hyped systems is the Russian-made S-400, touted by New Delhi as a one-stop solution to counter aerial threats from both Pakistan and China.
The 2025 conflict between India and Pakistan marked an important chapter in testing the S-400 technology. The conflict began on May 7, when India attacked what it alleged were terrorist targets in both Pakistani-held Kashmir and Pakistan proper, using drone and missile strikes. The conflict lasted for four days, culminating in a U.S-facilitated ceasefire. However, the brief conflict debunked a lot of the myths regarding the S-400 technology.
First, India claimed that the mobile S-400 would be able to control Pakistan’s airspace. In contrast, Pakistani aircraft continued to operate freely, according to official briefings by the Pakistani military. Although the Pakistan Air Force (PAF) aircraft were in their own airspace, they were still within the air defense range.

Read More »