ECONOMIC DIPLOMACY

The ongoing debate on the transformation of geopolitics to geo-economics is a reflection of policy-maker’s changing priorities due to evolving global and regional dynamics. Geopolitics and geostrategic compulsions have already cost the developing countries enormously. There is mounting recognition to exploit their economic potentials to peoples’ well-being. Moreover, there is ever-increasing realisation to value human security, an essential element of national security, which is hugely dependent on economic security.

The ever-increasing utility of economic diplomacy or the diplonomics, as coined by Sudhir Kumar, in the evolved geo-economic considerations has attained essentiality. The diplonomics calls for productive engagement between interstate and inter-organisational dealings to accrue mutual benefits.

The much-needed economic security can best be ensured through bold economic diplomacy by showcasing the strengths of Pakistan. Pakistan is blessed with a geographical location that makes it strategically relevant, with its amazing topography and climate, best suited for all types of agricultural activities needed to ensure food security for its over 220 million population. Pakistan’s strategic location and vast expanse of fertile land offers numerous opportunities to Central Asia States, Russia and Afghanistan to trade with rest of the world. Perhaps, China recognised Pakistan’s value and launched China-Pakistan Economic Corridor (CPEC), a flagship project of its Belt and Road Initiative (BRI) for mutual benefits.

Likewise, Pakistan offers numerous opportunities for investments in a number areas including exploitation of natural resources. For the purpose, Pakistan’s diplomatic corps needs to showcase the opportunities in an effective manner with requisite incentives to the strategic investors. Moreover, it is necessary to resolve legal issues connected with the Reko Diq case against the Tethyan Copper Company (TCC) so that foreign investors do not feel deterred from coming to Pakistan.

Pakistan’s successful efforts to accrue the benefits from climate-economy can serve as a model for economic diplomacy in other fields of economy. Pakistan’s initiative to offer support, both technical and manpower, to Saudi Arabia in its efforts to greenize the desert kingdom can bring numerous economic benefits for Pakistan, including remittances from the semi-skilled workers.

Unfortunately, international institutions are not so kind to Pakistan and in spite of its near total compliance of the conditions posed by Financial Action Task Force (FATF), it remains in the grey list. While efforts are in hand to remove any legal hurdles, concerted efforts by both economic managers and diplomatic corps are needed to regain the white status, which will be helpful in furthering economic security.

Pakistan has worked hard to regain its lost grounds in essential agricultural produce like wheat, rice, cotton and sugarcane. It is now incumbent upon our diplonomics managers to find non-traditional markets for Pakistan so that our exports improve and the perennial issues of balance of payment is resolved to some extent. Likewise, Pakistan is one the leading producer of the dairy products and according to the Pakistan Dairy Association, its export potential ranges between 28-30 billion USD, however, it actually stood at 680 million USD in 2020.

The successful management of the pandemic crisis has also provided an opportunity to Pakistan’s economic managers to offer our diplomats to showcase our progress in development of medical devices and expertise of our medics.

The incumbent government needs to pursue the mango, olive and honey diplomacy as part of its campaign to achieve self-sufficiency and export the value added products. The incentive models adopted under Make in Pakistan for the Mobile Phones industry and Automobile industry may be replicated in other sectors like hydrocarbon exploration, mineral development, and other large-scale manufacturing.

Tourism is another sector that can attract foreign visitors and investment through effective economic diplomacy. Pakistan has numerous avenues to offer, from religious tourism to mountain tourism, and historical tourism to nature tourism across the length and breadth of the country. Pakistan is home to the birth sites and virtuous places of at least three religions; Hinduism, Buddhism, and Sikhism. If developed, protected, and preserved properly, these religious sites would help our diplomats portray Pakistan’s soft image in ensuring religious freedom for the minorities and attract a large number of devotees every year from all over the world.

In fast-changing global and regional environment, economic security is key to human security and without human security, ensuring national security would be extremely challenging. Therefore, in order to strengthen our economic security, it is necessary that an effective economic diplomacy strategy is formulated and pursued relentlessly by all missions abroad. This would not only help project Pakistan’s soft image but also attract much needed foreign investment necessary to address the perpetual problems of the balance of payment, detrimental to our economic security.

Dr. Zia Ul Haque Shamsi is the author of the book ‘Nuclear Deterrence and Conflict Management Between India and Pakistan’. He is presently working as the Director at the Centre for Aerospace & Security Studies (CASS). The article was first published in Daily Times. He can be reached at [email protected]

Image Source: Etfa Khurshid Mirza
 


Share this article

Facebook
Twitter
LinkedIn

Recent Publications

Browse through the list of recent publications.

The Cover-up: IAF Narrative of the May 2025 Air Battle

Even after one year since the India-Pakistan May war of 2025, the Indian discourse regarding Operation Sindoor remains uncertain under its pretence of restraint. The Pahalgam attack on 22 April, which killed 26 people, triggered an escalatory spiral. New Delhi quickly accused Pakistan-linked elements, while Islamabad refuted the allegation and demanded an independent investigation. On 7 May, India launched attacks deep inside Pakistan under what it later termed as Operation Sindoor. The political motive was intended to turn the crisis into coercive signalling by shifting the blame onto the enemy and projecting a sense of military superiority.
This episode, however, began to fray immediately as war seldom follows the intended script. Within minutes PAF shot down 7 IAF aircraft including 4 Rafales. On 8 May, Reuters reported that at least two Indian aircraft were shot down by a Pakistani J-10C, while the local government sources reported other aircraft crashes in Indian-occupied Jammu and Kashmir

Read More »

Why the IAF’s Post-Sindoor Spending Surge is a Sign of Panic

After Operation Sindoor, India is spending billions of dollars on new weapons. This is being taken by many people as an indication of military prowess. It is not. This rush to procure weapons is in fact an acknowledgement that the Air Force in India had failed to do what it was meant to do. The costly jets and missiles that India had purchased over the years failed to yield the promised results.

Sindoor was soon followed by India in sealing the gaps which the operation had exposed. It was reported that Indian Air Force (IAF) is looking to speed up its purchases of more than 7 billion USD. This will involve other Rafale fighter jets with India already ordering 26 more Rafales to the Navy in 2024 at an estimated cost of about 3.9 billion USD. India is also seeking long-range standoff missiles, Israeli loitering munitions and increased drone capabilities. Special financial powers of the Indian military were activated to issue emergency procurement orders. The magnitude and rate of these purchases speak volumes.

Indian media and defence analysts have over the years considered the Rafale as a game changer. When India purchased 36 Rafales aircrafts at an approximate cost of 8.7 billion USD, analysts vowed that the aircraft would provide India with air superiority over Pakistan. Operation Sindoor disproved all those allegations. Indian aircraft did not even fly in Pakistani airspace when the fighting started. India solely depended on standoff weapons that were launched at a safe distance. The air defence system of Pakistan, comprising of the HQ-9 surface-to-air missile system and its own fighters, stood its ground.

Read More »

May 2025: Mosaic Warfare and the Myth of Centralised Air Power

Visualise a modern-day Air Force commander sitting in the operations room, miles away from the combat zone, overseeing every friendly and enemy aircraft and all assets involved in the campaign. In a split second, he can task a fighter, reposition a drone, and authorise a strike. In today’s promising technological era, he does not even need an operations room; a laptop on his desktop will suffice. The situation looks promising as it offers efficiency, precision, and control. The term used for such operational control is ‘centralisation’, which has been made possible with advanced networking, integrating space, cyber, surveillance, artificial intelligence, and seamless communication, enabling a single commander to manage an entire campaign from a single node. Centralised command and control, championed by the Western air forces and then adopted by many others, has thus been seen as a pinnacle of modern military power.
The concept of centralisation, enabled by state-of-the-art networking, may seem promising, but it is nothing more than a myth.

Read More »