ECONOMIC DIPLOMACY

The ongoing debate on the transformation of geopolitics to geo-economics is a reflection of policy-maker’s changing priorities due to evolving global and regional dynamics. Geopolitics and geostrategic compulsions have already cost the developing countries enormously. There is mounting recognition to exploit their economic potentials to peoples’ well-being. Moreover, there is ever-increasing realisation to value human security, an essential element of national security, which is hugely dependent on economic security.

The ever-increasing utility of economic diplomacy or the diplonomics, as coined by Sudhir Kumar, in the evolved geo-economic considerations has attained essentiality. The diplonomics calls for productive engagement between interstate and inter-organisational dealings to accrue mutual benefits.

The much-needed economic security can best be ensured through bold economic diplomacy by showcasing the strengths of Pakistan. Pakistan is blessed with a geographical location that makes it strategically relevant, with its amazing topography and climate, best suited for all types of agricultural activities needed to ensure food security for its over 220 million population. Pakistan’s strategic location and vast expanse of fertile land offers numerous opportunities to Central Asia States, Russia and Afghanistan to trade with rest of the world. Perhaps, China recognised Pakistan’s value and launched China-Pakistan Economic Corridor (CPEC), a flagship project of its Belt and Road Initiative (BRI) for mutual benefits.

Likewise, Pakistan offers numerous opportunities for investments in a number areas including exploitation of natural resources. For the purpose, Pakistan’s diplomatic corps needs to showcase the opportunities in an effective manner with requisite incentives to the strategic investors. Moreover, it is necessary to resolve legal issues connected with the Reko Diq case against the Tethyan Copper Company (TCC) so that foreign investors do not feel deterred from coming to Pakistan.

Pakistan’s successful efforts to accrue the benefits from climate-economy can serve as a model for economic diplomacy in other fields of economy. Pakistan’s initiative to offer support, both technical and manpower, to Saudi Arabia in its efforts to greenize the desert kingdom can bring numerous economic benefits for Pakistan, including remittances from the semi-skilled workers.

Unfortunately, international institutions are not so kind to Pakistan and in spite of its near total compliance of the conditions posed by Financial Action Task Force (FATF), it remains in the grey list. While efforts are in hand to remove any legal hurdles, concerted efforts by both economic managers and diplomatic corps are needed to regain the white status, which will be helpful in furthering economic security.

Pakistan has worked hard to regain its lost grounds in essential agricultural produce like wheat, rice, cotton and sugarcane. It is now incumbent upon our diplonomics managers to find non-traditional markets for Pakistan so that our exports improve and the perennial issues of balance of payment is resolved to some extent. Likewise, Pakistan is one the leading producer of the dairy products and according to the Pakistan Dairy Association, its export potential ranges between 28-30 billion USD, however, it actually stood at 680 million USD in 2020.

The successful management of the pandemic crisis has also provided an opportunity to Pakistan’s economic managers to offer our diplomats to showcase our progress in development of medical devices and expertise of our medics.

The incumbent government needs to pursue the mango, olive and honey diplomacy as part of its campaign to achieve self-sufficiency and export the value added products. The incentive models adopted under Make in Pakistan for the Mobile Phones industry and Automobile industry may be replicated in other sectors like hydrocarbon exploration, mineral development, and other large-scale manufacturing.

Tourism is another sector that can attract foreign visitors and investment through effective economic diplomacy. Pakistan has numerous avenues to offer, from religious tourism to mountain tourism, and historical tourism to nature tourism across the length and breadth of the country. Pakistan is home to the birth sites and virtuous places of at least three religions; Hinduism, Buddhism, and Sikhism. If developed, protected, and preserved properly, these religious sites would help our diplomats portray Pakistan’s soft image in ensuring religious freedom for the minorities and attract a large number of devotees every year from all over the world.

In fast-changing global and regional environment, economic security is key to human security and without human security, ensuring national security would be extremely challenging. Therefore, in order to strengthen our economic security, it is necessary that an effective economic diplomacy strategy is formulated and pursued relentlessly by all missions abroad. This would not only help project Pakistan’s soft image but also attract much needed foreign investment necessary to address the perpetual problems of the balance of payment, detrimental to our economic security.

Dr. Zia Ul Haque Shamsi is the author of the book ‘Nuclear Deterrence and Conflict Management Between India and Pakistan’. He is presently working as the Director at the Centre for Aerospace & Security Studies (CASS). The article was first published in Daily Times. He can be reached at [email protected]

Image Source: Etfa Khurshid Mirza
 


Share this article

Facebook
Twitter
LinkedIn

Recent Publications

Browse through the list of recent publications.

The US-Israel War on Iran: Objectives, Strategy, and Escalation Management

Zahra Niazi
‘States tend to overestimate themselves or the benefits and swiftness of war, and to underestimate their opponents’ capabilities, intentions, or the costs and duration of war.’ If anything, the 2026 war initiated by the United States and Israel against Iran shall be remembered in the annals of warfare among the most visible manifestations of this dynamic.
The war, immediately preceded by the January mass protests in Iran, did not represent a sudden rupture but rather the continuation of a 47-year-long confrontation and a more intense phase of the June 2025 war.
The US Secretary of War, Pete Hegseth, defined the war’s objectives as being laser-focused: to destroy Iran’s missile capabilities and its security infrastructure, while ensuring that it could never develop nuclear weapons. Beyond these stated objectives, among the priorities on the continuum also lay the objective of regime change, with both President Trump and Prime Minister Netanyahu explicitly calling on the Iranian population to take over the government at the outset of the war.

Read More »

Marka-e-Haq to the Peace Talks: Pakistan’s Middle Power Status

On 7th May 2025, Pakistan’s military forces took the international security community by surprise when it demonstrated operational superiority against its larger belligerent adversary India with its rapid and coordinated response. The Four-Day conflict proved to be a watershed moment for Pakistan, marking its rapid emergence as an important player in the region. In recent years, amidst the ongoing global competition between the United States and China, Islamabad has adopted a position of ’Strategic Balancing,’ where it maintains ties of cooperation with both Beijing and Washington. Deft diplomacy, emphasis on geo-economics, and credible conventional and strategic deterrence have remained the foundational pillars for Pakistan’s ambition as a rising middle power

Read More »

Debunking the S-400 Shield: Lessons from the India-Pakistan Conflict

Air defense has always been a central aspect of warfare. In South Asia, the phenomenon carries immense significance due to compressed reaction times. In this context, one of the most-hyped systems is the Russian-made S-400, touted by New Delhi as a one-stop solution to counter aerial threats from both Pakistan and China.
The 2025 conflict between India and Pakistan marked an important chapter in testing the S-400 technology. The conflict began on May 7, when India attacked what it alleged were terrorist targets in both Pakistani-held Kashmir and Pakistan proper, using drone and missile strikes. The conflict lasted for four days, culminating in a U.S-facilitated ceasefire. However, the brief conflict debunked a lot of the myths regarding the S-400 technology.
First, India claimed that the mobile S-400 would be able to control Pakistan’s airspace. In contrast, Pakistani aircraft continued to operate freely, according to official briefings by the Pakistani military. Although the Pakistan Air Force (PAF) aircraft were in their own airspace, they were still within the air defense range.

Read More »