Algorithims of Armageddon Image

Sam J. Tangredi and George Galdorisi, Algorithms of Armageddon: The Impact of Artificial Intelligence on Future Wars (Maryland: Naval Institute Press, 2025)

Reviewed by Syed Ahmed Ali

Modern military conflict is dominated by sophisticated technology, where the army with the most advanced capabilities controls the battlefield.  The dominant technology in this era is artificial intelligence. As was rightly pointed out by Professor Stuart Russell, who described autonomous weapons as the “third revolution in warfare”, after gunpowder and nuclear weapons. In this context, Algorithms of Armageddon: The Impact of Artificial Intelligence on Future Wars is a critical read, as it explores how artificial intelligence has reshaped warfare. The book has been authored by Sam J. Tangredi and George Galdorisi, which provides a rich, detailed account of how algorithms have enabled autonomous weapon systems to outpace human decision-making. The authors illustrate how artificial intelligence has overwhelmed the enemy with the speed and reliability in its decision-making. Understanding how artificial intelligence will impact weapon systems is critical, as autonomous decision-making is a core pillar of modern warfare. This makes the book a necessary read for those who are uninitiated to the realities of autonomous warfare.

Tangredi and Galdorisi provided a comprehensive account, explaining what Artificial Intelligence is, how it has evolved throughout history, and why it is significant. Throughout this book, the authors have quoted several real-life incidents explaining the difference in efficiency between humans and machines. For example, (pg. 102), the authors cited the example of an Iranian air defence officer who wrongly identified and shot down a Ukrainian airliner as a cruise missile, due to incomplete information. Such examples cement the book’s claim that the weaponisation of AI is inevitable, as the speed and reliability of decision-making cannot be matched by humans. The authors, recognising the inevitability of autonomous weapons, provided a section discussing International law governing the use of Lethal Autonomous Weapons (LAWS). The book concludes by presenting a hypothetical, fictional scenario in which AI is used in a World War III setting. The purpose of which seems to be the prediction of the nature of modern conflict. The authors do not make exaggerated claims about the future of AI; instead note that the current utility of AI is largely limited to processing large quantities of data.

Algorithms of Armageddon is an excellent entry point to the world of AI-integrated military systems. The book starts from basic concepts of artificial intelligence, such as types of machine learning, algorithms, and Big Data. All these complex terminologies are broken down into simpler contexts, making it easier to digest for a non-technical audience. The book avoids using excessive technical jargon while not compromising on important concepts. For example, on (pg. 74), the book discusses human in the on-the-loop, on the loop, and off the loop AI decision-making models. The authors have adopted a simplistic style of expression which has made the book comprehensible to a larger audience, thereby increasing its accessibility to a larger audience.

While the simplicity of style has broken down complex concepts of artificial intelligence into digestible ideas, it has come at the cost of depth and nuance. AI decision-making models are incredibly complex, where the construction of algorithms and their interaction with Big Data can often lead to mixed results. The book shies away from discussing complex AI paradoxes like the Black Box effect, where the inner workings of algorithms are not clear. Furthermore, the book does not discuss the integration of AI into complex strategic weapons such as nuclear, cyber, and conventional weapons.  The subject of nuclear deterrence in particular is missing, which is critical, as these weapons provide strategic stability. Automated weapon systems in particular have a direct impact on decision making which may cause unintended military escalation, this issue needs to be further explored .The book is also missing a chapter on military doctrines regarding the application of artificial intelligence. The authors have sporadically made mention of American perspectives on autonomous weapons, but nothing comprehensive. In the case of China and Russia, the coverage of their perspective on autonomous weapons is limited, as sources from government officials and military officers were largely missing. The absence of these voices reduces the credibility of the Chinese and Russian incompetence that the authors claim.

To conclude the book does not discuss key areas of importance, such as AI doctrine, impact on nuclear deterrence, and other such factors. Rather, it focuses on the important concepts related to AI decision-making. For this reason, this book is less suited for more informed audiences that are looking to go deeper to explore this new type of warfare. For seasoned readers, alternative titles such as “AI and the Bomb” by James Johnson, which examines the impact of artificial intelligence on strategic stability and nuclear deterrence are worth exploring. Another relevant title is Cold War 2.0 by George Takach. His work explores the technological competition between great powers for emerging technologies like artificial intelligence. Nevertheless, “Algorithms of Armageddon: The impact of Artificial Intelligence on future Wars” is an excellent resource to understand the basics of AI-integrated weapons. Its place in the literature is that of an introductory chapter to the world of autonomous weapon systems, serving as an ideal platform to dive deeper into the field of emerging technologies.

Syed Ahmed Ali is a Research Assistant at the Centre for Aerospace & Security Studies (CASS), in Islamabad, Pakistan. He can be reached at [email protected]


Share this article

Facebook
Twitter
LinkedIn

Recent Publications

Browse through the list of recent publications.

The US-Israel War on Iran: Objectives, Strategy, and Escalation Management

Zahra Niazi
‘States tend to overestimate themselves or the benefits and swiftness of war, and to underestimate their opponents’ capabilities, intentions, or the costs and duration of war.’ If anything, the 2026 war initiated by the United States and Israel against Iran shall be remembered in the annals of warfare among the most visible manifestations of this dynamic.
The war, immediately preceded by the January mass protests in Iran, did not represent a sudden rupture but rather the continuation of a 47-year-long confrontation and a more intense phase of the June 2025 war.
The US Secretary of War, Pete Hegseth, defined the war’s objectives as being laser-focused: to destroy Iran’s missile capabilities and its security infrastructure, while ensuring that it could never develop nuclear weapons. Beyond these stated objectives, among the priorities on the continuum also lay the objective of regime change, with both President Trump and Prime Minister Netanyahu explicitly calling on the Iranian population to take over the government at the outset of the war.

Read More »

Marka-e-Haq to the Peace Talks: Pakistan’s Middle Power Status

On 7th May 2025, Pakistan’s military forces took the international security community by surprise when it demonstrated operational superiority against its larger belligerent adversary India with its rapid and coordinated response. The Four-Day conflict proved to be a watershed moment for Pakistan, marking its rapid emergence as an important player in the region. In recent years, amidst the ongoing global competition between the United States and China, Islamabad has adopted a position of ’Strategic Balancing,’ where it maintains ties of cooperation with both Beijing and Washington. Deft diplomacy, emphasis on geo-economics, and credible conventional and strategic deterrence have remained the foundational pillars for Pakistan’s ambition as a rising middle power

Read More »

Debunking the S-400 Shield: Lessons from the India-Pakistan Conflict

Air defense has always been a central aspect of warfare. In South Asia, the phenomenon carries immense significance due to compressed reaction times. In this context, one of the most-hyped systems is the Russian-made S-400, touted by New Delhi as a one-stop solution to counter aerial threats from both Pakistan and China.
The 2025 conflict between India and Pakistan marked an important chapter in testing the S-400 technology. The conflict began on May 7, when India attacked what it alleged were terrorist targets in both Pakistani-held Kashmir and Pakistan proper, using drone and missile strikes. The conflict lasted for four days, culminating in a U.S-facilitated ceasefire. However, the brief conflict debunked a lot of the myths regarding the S-400 technology.
First, India claimed that the mobile S-400 would be able to control Pakistan’s airspace. In contrast, Pakistani aircraft continued to operate freely, according to official briefings by the Pakistani military. Although the Pakistan Air Force (PAF) aircraft were in their own airspace, they were still within the air defense range.

Read More »