afghanistan

President Biden’s announcement to withdraw US forces from Afghanistan by September 11, 2021 has drawn extreme reactions ranging from surprise to dismay. While the US administration itself is against the withdrawal, many political and military analysts are also against the decision. They fear that the vacuum created by this withdrawal will lead to a struggle for power and control, seriously affecting the country’s stability and wellbeing of the people. Additionally, it will also have serious implications for regional stability in general and for Pakistan in particular.

The US, along with its allies, failed to bring peace in the country despite staying there for almost two decades. Similarly, despite receiving huge sums of money, the Afghan National Security Forces (ANSF) could not be trained and equipped to effectively handle the country’s security requirements. During these two decades, the Taliban remained a force to be reckoned with and controlled large parts of Afghan territory. An assessment of the situation indicates that the US was forced to negotiate with her sworn enemy, the Taliban, and withdraw on their terms without being able to reach a comprehensive peace deal. After two decades of occupation by the strongest military coalition and with an expenditure of huge financial resources, the sole superpower along with its allies has faced defeat from the Taliban, a rag-tag fighting force with limited resources and no advanced weaponry.

US’ decision of sudden withdrawal without achieving comprehensive peace or even conditions conducive for peace, is extremely irresponsible. The hurried departure also suggests that US is not likely to provide the promised financial support to run even routine government affairs, and reconstruction and rebuilding of the destroyed country. Like the past, the US will not accept its failure and for face saving, will blame others, the easiest being Pakistan. The Afghan ruling leadership has also failed to effectively use foreign financial and other support to create workable systems and build forces capable of effectively tackling security challenges. They however, are endeavouring to continue to hang on to power regardless of the cost it may entail for the Afghan people. The Afghan leadership, following in US footsteps, also finds it convenient to blame Pakistan for their internal failures and inability to effectively utilise the resources provided by the coalition.

Afghan peace and stability faces multiple challenges. The Afghan leadership’s endeavours to remain in power are possibly the biggest hurdle in reaching a consensus solution. The Taliban, emboldened by the US decision to withdraw forces, have hardened their stance and are unwilling to show flexibility to reach a peace agreement. Various other Afghan factions and war lords are also assessing the situation and would want their share in any future arrangement. Neighbouring countries are also critical to success or failure of the peace process. While their positive attitude can help bring peace, working for vested interests would lead to failure of the process. India may find an unsettled Afghanistan to its advantage as it would adversely affect Pakistan’s internal security as well as relations with Afghanistan, providing an opportunity to use terrorists based in Afghanistan against Pakistan. Lastly, the international community also has a huge responsibility in stabilising the country, as their funding is essential for running the government, paying the forces etc.

At the moment, situation appears quite grim. A sudden US exit, the Taliban’s hardened stance, the government’s lack of interest in participating in the peace process are all indicative of a likely chaotic situation in the country leading to loss of life and property. Many people are already seeking political asylum for fear of reprisal by the Taliban. However, some people are also trying to exploit the situation in order to settle in Western countries.

Increasing militancy and violence in Afghanistan will also affect all its neighbours. The violence will force a huge number of Afghans to take refuge in neighbouring countries, especially Pakistan, which is already hosting a large Afghan refugee population. An influx of refugees will not only put an economic burden on the host countries, but will also create internal security problems. Additionally, refugees are also likely to bring a surge in COVID cases in Pakistan and other host countries. Predicting an upsurge in violence and lawlessness, Australia has decided to close its diplomatic mission in Afghanistan. Many more countries, especially Western ones are likely to follow suit. Incidentally, these are also the countries that maintained their military presence in Afghanistan for a very long time.

It is predicted that even if the present government in Kabul falls, the Taliban will face resistance from the war lords leading to a protracted civil war. Since militancy and instability in Afghanistan will affect the neighbouring countries as well as the world at large, all stake holders must make efforts for working out and implementation of a comprehensive peace plan. This cannot be achieved without sincerity and willingness of the Afghan leadership, neighbouring countries’ positive role and financial support from major world powers for many years.

Neighbours, especially Pakistan, which gets affected the most by stability or instability, are already making all-out efforts to bring all parties to the negotiating table. Pakistan’s political and military leadership has repeatedly reiterated their support for comprehensive peace in Afghanistan. The neighbouring countries can also help Afghan economy by taking steps to enhance trade and tourism. Distant neighbours must curb their temptations to exploit the situation and refrain from interfering in Afghan matters. The US at this time, must use its influence on the present Afghan government to work towards a negotiated peace process.

Air Marshal Ashfaque Arain (Retd) is Director of Strategic Defence & Security (CASS). The article was first published in The Nation. He can be reached at [email protected].

Image source:  Imtiaz, Gull.  â€˜Difficult’ Afghan Peace to Help Reduce US Cost of War”, Voice of America –  www.voanews.com/usa/pompeo-difficult-afghan-peace-help-reduce-us-cost-war. Accessed 10 June 2021.


Share this article

Facebook
Twitter
LinkedIn

Recent Publications

Browse through the list of recent publications.

The US-Israel War on Iran: Objectives, Strategy, and Escalation Management

Zahra Niazi
‘States tend to overestimate themselves or the benefits and swiftness of war, and to underestimate their opponents’ capabilities, intentions, or the costs and duration of war.’ If anything, the 2026 war initiated by the United States and Israel against Iran shall be remembered in the annals of warfare among the most visible manifestations of this dynamic.
The war, immediately preceded by the January mass protests in Iran, did not represent a sudden rupture but rather the continuation of a 47-year-long confrontation and a more intense phase of the June 2025 war.
The US Secretary of War, Pete Hegseth, defined the war’s objectives as being laser-focused: to destroy Iran’s missile capabilities and its security infrastructure, while ensuring that it could never develop nuclear weapons. Beyond these stated objectives, among the priorities on the continuum also lay the objective of regime change, with both President Trump and Prime Minister Netanyahu explicitly calling on the Iranian population to take over the government at the outset of the war.

Read More »

Marka-e-Haq to the Peace Talks: Pakistan’s Middle Power Status

On 7th May 2025, Pakistan’s military forces took the international security community by surprise when it demonstrated operational superiority against its larger belligerent adversary India with its rapid and coordinated response. The Four-Day conflict proved to be a watershed moment for Pakistan, marking its rapid emergence as an important player in the region. In recent years, amidst the ongoing global competition between the United States and China, Islamabad has adopted a position of ’Strategic Balancing,’ where it maintains ties of cooperation with both Beijing and Washington. Deft diplomacy, emphasis on geo-economics, and credible conventional and strategic deterrence have remained the foundational pillars for Pakistan’s ambition as a rising middle power

Read More »

Debunking the S-400 Shield: Lessons from the India-Pakistan Conflict

Air defense has always been a central aspect of warfare. In South Asia, the phenomenon carries immense significance due to compressed reaction times. In this context, one of the most-hyped systems is the Russian-made S-400, touted by New Delhi as a one-stop solution to counter aerial threats from both Pakistan and China.
The 2025 conflict between India and Pakistan marked an important chapter in testing the S-400 technology. The conflict began on May 7, when India attacked what it alleged were terrorist targets in both Pakistani-held Kashmir and Pakistan proper, using drone and missile strikes. The conflict lasted for four days, culminating in a U.S-facilitated ceasefire. However, the brief conflict debunked a lot of the myths regarding the S-400 technology.
First, India claimed that the mobile S-400 would be able to control Pakistan’s airspace. In contrast, Pakistani aircraft continued to operate freely, according to official briefings by the Pakistani military. Although the Pakistan Air Force (PAF) aircraft were in their own airspace, they were still within the air defense range.

Read More »