titan

The passenger liner ‘Titanic’ sank more than a 100 years ago in 1912 but continues to be an intriguing story for many. Its dreadful end, with more than 1, 500 lives lost, has been captured in various books, movies and plays, with each offering a unique perspective of its loss. The release of the 1958 film ‘A Night to Remember’, based on Walter Lord’s book, presented its detailed and captivating account. The subsequent discovery of the ship’s wreckage in 1985 further fueled public interest. Finally, the Oscar-winning film ‘Titanic’, released some 12 years later in 1997, whose charm continues to resonate today, familiarised a much younger generation with its heartbreaking but short voyage. The artefacts, recovered from the ship’s wreckage in numerous controversial and dangerous expeditions, are preserved in various museums around the world.

Fast forward to 2023, people are still inclined towards visiting the ship’s remnants (protected under the United Nations Educational, Scientific and Cultural Organization Convention on the Protection of the Underwater Cultural Heritage Convention and the UN Law of the Sea) at 12,500 feet (2,100 fathoms) at the cost of a fortune and even at considerable risk to their lives. The recent OceanGate voyage, which resulted in the implosion of the submersible ‘Titan’ with five such adventure-seekers on board, took the world by surprise for two reasons. Firstly, the incident was undeniably heart-wrenching, as five remarkable individuals on board (including a teenager) lost their lives in one of the most devastating ways possible. Secondly, with the rapid pace of technological advancements, such incidents are unexpected, making it all the more shocking. For Pakistanis, in particular, the news was significantly distressing. Not only were two of the victims a Pakistani father-son duo, but also the fact that this devastating news broke shortly after approximately 209 Pakistanis became victims of the ocean waters off Greece’s coast. The latter was the third major incident reported since February in which migrants and refugees from Pakistan lost their lives at sea. The nation mourned the unimaginable pain of the victims’ families of both incidents.

Apart from the fact that the ill-fated ‘Titan’, like the Titanic, met a very unfortunate end, both share another similarity. Hollywood Director and deep-sea explorer James Cameron (behind the movie ‘Titanic’), who himself has visited the wreckage around 33 times, pointed out that similar to the manner in which the warnings of an approaching iceberg were ignored by the Titanic’s captain, concerns regarding the Titan’s safety were not taken seriously by the OceanGate company despite being cautioned several times regarding its faults. In 2018, a group of submersible experts wrote a letter to OceanGate expressing their apprehensions about the submersible’s development. They urged that the submersible needed further certifications before allowing it to take passengers to the ship’s wreckage site. Likewise, in 2019, Karl Stanley, a submersible expert, informed the OceanGate CEO regarding a potential defect in the vessel experienced when Stanley used it for an undersea excursion trip off the Bahamas coast.

The use of carbon fibre composite for the main cylindrical hull was also seen as a faulty choice for the design, given that composites should not be used for vessels subjected to immense external pressure like the Titan. The application of aviation thinking for deep submergence may also have been one of the issues contributing to the implosion.

The tragedy highlights the risks inherent in maritime exploration; and is likely to have a psychological impact and dampen the enthusiasm of young ocean lovers who are usually inclined to undertake adventurous activities in spite of the associated risks.

While the presence of private companies has undoubtedly increased the accessibility of the oceans’ uncharted depths, such commercial expansion is not without its perils. The sinking of the Titan is a reminder that no technology can guarantee absolute safety. It not only raises serious questions about the safety standards, regulations and certifications in place by companies like OceanGate, it also brings to light the need to review existing international certification processes for deep-sea exploration. It emphasises more stringent safety protocols and comprehensive evaluations before such ventures are carried out given that maritime tourism (like space tourism) may become more and more frequent in the future with technological advancements.

In a tragically ironic twist of fate, a century later, the very same location bore witness to yet another harrowing incident, serving as a solemn reminder of the age-old adage: ‘There are no new accidents, only new victims.’ The Transportation Safety Board of Canada and the US Coast Guard are engaged in probing the exact cause of this tragic sinking. As we await their conclusive findings, it is imperative that the concerned stakeholders lend profound weight to these investigative revelations, so as to avert the occurrence of such dreadful events in times to come.

Shaza Arif is a Research Assistant at the Centre for Aerospace & Security Studies (CASS), Islamabad, Pakistan. She can be reached at: [email protected]


Share this article

Facebook
Twitter
LinkedIn

Recent Publications

Browse through the list of recent publications.

The US-Israel War on Iran: Objectives, Strategy, and Escalation Management

Zahra Niazi
‘States tend to overestimate themselves or the benefits and swiftness of war, and to underestimate their opponents’ capabilities, intentions, or the costs and duration of war.’ If anything, the 2026 war initiated by the United States and Israel against Iran shall be remembered in the annals of warfare among the most visible manifestations of this dynamic.
The war, immediately preceded by the January mass protests in Iran, did not represent a sudden rupture but rather the continuation of a 47-year-long confrontation and a more intense phase of the June 2025 war.
The US Secretary of War, Pete Hegseth, defined the war’s objectives as being laser-focused: to destroy Iran’s missile capabilities and its security infrastructure, while ensuring that it could never develop nuclear weapons. Beyond these stated objectives, among the priorities on the continuum also lay the objective of regime change, with both President Trump and Prime Minister Netanyahu explicitly calling on the Iranian population to take over the government at the outset of the war.

Read More »

Marka-e-Haq to the Peace Talks: Pakistan’s Middle Power Status

On 7th May 2025, Pakistan’s military forces took the international security community by surprise when it demonstrated operational superiority against its larger belligerent adversary India with its rapid and coordinated response. The Four-Day conflict proved to be a watershed moment for Pakistan, marking its rapid emergence as an important player in the region. In recent years, amidst the ongoing global competition between the United States and China, Islamabad has adopted a position of ’Strategic Balancing,’ where it maintains ties of cooperation with both Beijing and Washington. Deft diplomacy, emphasis on geo-economics, and credible conventional and strategic deterrence have remained the foundational pillars for Pakistan’s ambition as a rising middle power

Read More »

Debunking the S-400 Shield: Lessons from the India-Pakistan Conflict

Air defense has always been a central aspect of warfare. In South Asia, the phenomenon carries immense significance due to compressed reaction times. In this context, one of the most-hyped systems is the Russian-made S-400, touted by New Delhi as a one-stop solution to counter aerial threats from both Pakistan and China.
The 2025 conflict between India and Pakistan marked an important chapter in testing the S-400 technology. The conflict began on May 7, when India attacked what it alleged were terrorist targets in both Pakistani-held Kashmir and Pakistan proper, using drone and missile strikes. The conflict lasted for four days, culminating in a U.S-facilitated ceasefire. However, the brief conflict debunked a lot of the myths regarding the S-400 technology.
First, India claimed that the mobile S-400 would be able to control Pakistan’s airspace. In contrast, Pakistani aircraft continued to operate freely, according to official briefings by the Pakistani military. Although the Pakistan Air Force (PAF) aircraft were in their own airspace, they were still within the air defense range.

Read More »