A Ray of Hope in the Midst of Democratic Recession - Zahra - Article thematic Image - Nov

As a Pakistani citizen, hardly anybody would deny that all democratic tenures in the country have been imperfect, and the basic tenets of democracy have been undermined time and again, albeit to varying degrees. In fact, in this day and age, even those democracies that claim to be its champions are rarely perfect. However, recent months have witnessed democracy in Pakistan being weakened to an extent that is not only unfortunate but also unprecedented. In the midst of all this, hope remains as long as the fearless electors of democracy continue to stand by the struggle to uphold democracy, beginning with the restoration of a government that is elected directly through popular voting, i.e., the very foundation of democratic governance. Despite attempts to push them to the margins and struggling with despair and discontent at times, these brave men and women have proven to be resilient and have shown a commendable commitment to endeavour for what they believe is right.

The versions of democracy we have witnessed in Pakistan have been distinctive but never reflective of a truly ‘meaningful democracy.’ There have undoubtedly been several anxious moments during the democratic tenures in the country. Civil liberties have been violated, authoritarian enclaves have existed, the rule of law has been dishonoured, and horizontal accountability has been discounted time after time. The degree of prevalence of these features has, however, considerably varied. At times, it has been relatively less and, at other times, considerable.

However, the current frustration of the citizens with the deterioration of political rights and the rule of law in Pakistan is perhaps the most striking. There is visibly widespread public exasperation and anguish. Nevertheless, the good news is that the strength with which these Pakistanis are embracing and endorsing democratic values has never been seen before. People are increasingly overcoming the shackles of fear and forging a force that is not only demanding change but is an embodiment of change itself. They struggle with hopelessness and powerlessness at times but are no longer ready to settle for less nor continue living in a world as it is. Amid all the chaos, their sense of ebullience that they are now awakened is heartening to see, as a few years ago, the idea that things could change appeared alien to many. Children as young as seven and eight years old are becoming an active part of this change, and people can be seen understanding politics like never before. Raising ‘public awareness’ about politics no longer remains a matter of concern.

This refusal to settle for anything less shows that they can help establish a system that is not far from a meaningful and consolidated democracy, if not completely reflective of it. While their acute goal remains to advocate for the restoration of a government elected directly through ‘free and fair’ elections, their degree of passion and devotion shows that their struggle will not end with that. They will continue to champion and push for widespread political and institutional reforms and protection of their civil liberties.

In the end, it is important to assert that the struggle for democracy is worth it. Democracy remains the best way to advance peaceful and prosperous societies. Autocratic tendencies in democracies could be conducive to guaranteeing a sound economy in the short run in some cases but not individual and collective gratification, which is conditioned upon the exercise of one’s agency of free will in accordance with one’s own wants and needs, and the guarantee of individual freedom. This individual and collective gratification is a prerequisite of peaceful societies. Moreover, the higher the empowering environment, the greater the likelihood of inventiveness, through innovations, which facilitates the introduction of breakthrough economic reforms. Such an innovation-driven economic model would certainly ensure sustainable economic growth.

Zahra Niazi is a Research Assistant at the Centre for Aerospace & Security Studies (CASS), Islamabad, Pakistan. She can be reached at [email protected].


Share this article

Facebook
Twitter
LinkedIn

Recent Publications

Browse through the list of recent publications.

The US-Israel War on Iran: Objectives, Strategy, and Escalation Management

Zahra Niazi
‘States tend to overestimate themselves or the benefits and swiftness of war, and to underestimate their opponents’ capabilities, intentions, or the costs and duration of war.’ If anything, the 2026 war initiated by the United States and Israel against Iran shall be remembered in the annals of warfare among the most visible manifestations of this dynamic.
The war, immediately preceded by the January mass protests in Iran, did not represent a sudden rupture but rather the continuation of a 47-year-long confrontation and a more intense phase of the June 2025 war.
The US Secretary of War, Pete Hegseth, defined the war’s objectives as being laser-focused: to destroy Iran’s missile capabilities and its security infrastructure, while ensuring that it could never develop nuclear weapons. Beyond these stated objectives, among the priorities on the continuum also lay the objective of regime change, with both President Trump and Prime Minister Netanyahu explicitly calling on the Iranian population to take over the government at the outset of the war.

Read More »

Marka-e-Haq to the Peace Talks: Pakistan’s Middle Power Status

On 7th May 2025, Pakistan’s military forces took the international security community by surprise when it demonstrated operational superiority against its larger belligerent adversary India with its rapid and coordinated response. The Four-Day conflict proved to be a watershed moment for Pakistan, marking its rapid emergence as an important player in the region. In recent years, amidst the ongoing global competition between the United States and China, Islamabad has adopted a position of ’Strategic Balancing,’ where it maintains ties of cooperation with both Beijing and Washington. Deft diplomacy, emphasis on geo-economics, and credible conventional and strategic deterrence have remained the foundational pillars for Pakistan’s ambition as a rising middle power

Read More »

Debunking the S-400 Shield: Lessons from the India-Pakistan Conflict

Air defense has always been a central aspect of warfare. In South Asia, the phenomenon carries immense significance due to compressed reaction times. In this context, one of the most-hyped systems is the Russian-made S-400, touted by New Delhi as a one-stop solution to counter aerial threats from both Pakistan and China.
The 2025 conflict between India and Pakistan marked an important chapter in testing the S-400 technology. The conflict began on May 7, when India attacked what it alleged were terrorist targets in both Pakistani-held Kashmir and Pakistan proper, using drone and missile strikes. The conflict lasted for four days, culminating in a U.S-facilitated ceasefire. However, the brief conflict debunked a lot of the myths regarding the S-400 technology.
First, India claimed that the mobile S-400 would be able to control Pakistan’s airspace. In contrast, Pakistani aircraft continued to operate freely, according to official briefings by the Pakistani military. Although the Pakistan Air Force (PAF) aircraft were in their own airspace, they were still within the air defense range.

Read More »