WhatsApp_Image_2022-03-22_at_12.56_.17_PM_

The renowned US columnist Charley Reese once compiled a ‘Pop Quiz on Middle East’ which was published in ‘Orlando Sentinel’ – the leading newspaper of Orlando, Florida, on 8 February 1998.

The quiz served to further Reese’s objective which in his own words was to ‘stimulate, and if necessary, provoke people into thinking for themselves.

The Quiz consisted of a series of questions directed towards identifying the Middle Eastern country which had a history of committing blatant acts of violations of the United Nations Charter, its resolutions, international norms, treaties, and other acceptable standards of state conduct in the region – an obvious reference to Israel.

Reese then went on to expose the irony of international politics by noting that in spite of its perpetual record of bad behaviour, Israel continued to get a pat on the back, while another Middle Eastern country was routinely threatened for ‘not obeying’ UN resolution/s.

The Quiz was a satirical reminder to the reader about the harsh realities of international politics.

The column reflected the geopolitical situation of the time. Ironically, while the current environment may have changed, the larger framework of international relations which is shaped by the policy of extending a country’s power and influence through all possible means, including force remains intact.

This framework and the ensuing policies remain the chief determinant of which acts of aggression are to be condoned and which will be seen as violations of international law.

Charley Reese, whom Dr Eqbal Ahmad once called ‘a journalist guerrilla, who like all maquisards shoots from a less obvious, unexpected place’ is not alive today (he died in 2008), but in his spirit of ‘stimulating and provoking people into thinking for themselves’, it would be in order to write a sequel to his signature Quiz.

The obvious title in this case is ‘A Pop Quiz on South Asia.

’ Taking a lead from Reese’s piece, the pertinent questions would be as follows:

Q.Which South Asian country continues to sit on the oldest UNSC resolution (Resolution 48) which is still waiting to be implemented?

A.India.

Q.Which South Asian country has been forcibly annexing States and territories and altering its borders since its inception against international laws and norms?

A.India.

Q.The current Prime Minister of which South Asian was barred to travel to US for failing to stop anti-Muslim riots during his tenure as Chief Minister of Gujarat?

A.India.

Q: Which country initiated the race for nuclear weapons, ballistic, and cruise missiles in South Asia?

A.India.

Q.EU DisinfoLab, exposed which South Asian country for the dubious use of media, NGOs, fake identities, impersonation, resurrection of dead think-tanks, and even dead people to malign Pakistan?

A.India.

Q.The President and Founder of Genocide Watch identified which country in South Asia where the early warning signs of genocide are present, with a special mention of discriminatory legislation like Citizenship Amendment Act (CAA)?

A: India.

Q.According to Human Rights Watch, which South Asian country has legitimised discrimination against religious minorities and enabled violent Hindu nationalism?

A.India.

Q.A serving Naval officer of which South Asian country was apprehended while working undercover as a spy in Pakistan, for his involvement in espionage and sabotage activities?

A.India.

Q.Which South Asian country has been given a waiver to accommodate entry into the Nuclear Suppliers Group?

A.India.

Q.Which South Asian country has repeatedly been in the news for frequent incidents of loss and theft of nuclear and radioactive material?

A.India.

Q.Which South Asian country is a likely candidate for waiver in’ Countering America’s Adversaries Through Sanctions Act’ (CAATSA) after the delivery of Russian S-400 Surface to Air Missiles?

Q.Which South Asian country fired a nuclear-capable cruise missile into a neighbouring country, jeopardising air traffic and human lives on ground, and then covered it up with a casual and much delayed admission of technical malfunction?

A.India.

This Quiz is incomplete but long enough to determine that India, in spite of its poor record of fulfilling international obligations, pursuing state-sponsored policies of genocide, and growing religious and communal intolerance, continues to get away from international scrutiny because of the emerging geopolitical situation in the region.

This is a stark reminder that biased motives and perceived interests continue to override the larger considerations of peace and stability at the international level.

The resulting surge in instability and chaos, both in South Asia and globally is hardly surprising.

Air Marshal Farooq Habib (R) is presently working as Senior Director at the Centre for Aerospace & Security Studies (CASS), Islamabad, Pakistan. The article was first published in Pakistan Observer. He can be reached at [email protected]

Image Source: https://www.lankabusinessonline.com/category/industry/trade/page/10/


Share this article

Facebook
Twitter
LinkedIn

Recent Publications

Browse through the list of recent publications.

The Cover-up: IAF Narrative of the May 2025 Air Battle

Even after one year since the India-Pakistan May war of 2025, the Indian discourse regarding Operation Sindoor remains uncertain under its pretence of restraint. The Pahalgam attack on 22 April, which killed 26 people, triggered an escalatory spiral. New Delhi quickly accused Pakistan-linked elements, while Islamabad refuted the allegation and demanded an independent investigation. On 7 May, India launched attacks deep inside Pakistan under what it later termed as Operation Sindoor. The political motive was intended to turn the crisis into coercive signalling by shifting the blame onto the enemy and projecting a sense of military superiority.
This episode, however, began to fray immediately as war seldom follows the intended script. Within minutes PAF shot down 7 IAF aircraft including 4 Rafales. On 8 May, Reuters reported that at least two Indian aircraft were shot down by a Pakistani J-10C, while the local government sources reported other aircraft crashes in Indian-occupied Jammu and Kashmir

Read More »

Why the IAF’s Post-Sindoor Spending Surge is a Sign of Panic

After Operation Sindoor, India is spending billions of dollars on new weapons. This is being taken by many people as an indication of military prowess. It is not. This rush to procure weapons is in fact an acknowledgement that the Air Force in India had failed to do what it was meant to do. The costly jets and missiles that India had purchased over the years failed to yield the promised results.

Sindoor was soon followed by India in sealing the gaps which the operation had exposed. It was reported that Indian Air Force (IAF) is looking to speed up its purchases of more than 7 billion USD. This will involve other Rafale fighter jets with India already ordering 26 more Rafales to the Navy in 2024 at an estimated cost of about 3.9 billion USD. India is also seeking long-range standoff missiles, Israeli loitering munitions and increased drone capabilities. Special financial powers of the Indian military were activated to issue emergency procurement orders. The magnitude and rate of these purchases speak volumes.

Indian media and defence analysts have over the years considered the Rafale as a game changer. When India purchased 36 Rafales aircrafts at an approximate cost of 8.7 billion USD, analysts vowed that the aircraft would provide India with air superiority over Pakistan. Operation Sindoor disproved all those allegations. Indian aircraft did not even fly in Pakistani airspace when the fighting started. India solely depended on standoff weapons that were launched at a safe distance. The air defence system of Pakistan, comprising of the HQ-9 surface-to-air missile system and its own fighters, stood its ground.

Read More »

May 2025: Mosaic Warfare and the Myth of Centralised Air Power

Visualise a modern-day Air Force commander sitting in the operations room, miles away from the combat zone, overseeing every friendly and enemy aircraft and all assets involved in the campaign. In a split second, he can task a fighter, reposition a drone, and authorise a strike. In today’s promising technological era, he does not even need an operations room; a laptop on his desktop will suffice. The situation looks promising as it offers efficiency, precision, and control. The term used for such operational control is ‘centralisation’, which has been made possible with advanced networking, integrating space, cyber, surveillance, artificial intelligence, and seamless communication, enabling a single commander to manage an entire campaign from a single node. Centralised command and control, championed by the Western air forces and then adopted by many others, has thus been seen as a pinnacle of modern military power.
The concept of centralisation, enabled by state-of-the-art networking, may seem promising, but it is nothing more than a myth.

Read More »