12. Dr Usman W. Chohan-Cost-War-Ind-Oped thumbnail-April-2025-AP

Has the Indian leadership worked out the magnitude of damage that would be wrought on India’s economy if it were to initiate a war with Pakistan?

A macroeconomic analysis by the Centre for Aerospace & Security Studies (CASS) indicates that a four-week conventional war would incur USD 750 billion in economic losses to India — three-fourths of a trillion dollars in just four weeks. This analysis echoes the findings of a previous study made during the height of the 2019 India-Pakistan standoff, which found that India’s losses over such a period would have exceeded half a trillion dollars — USD 500 billion at a minimum back then. This would not be a trifling sum by any means for an economy that had not reached even 3 trillion US dollars at that time and which is now approaching USD 4.2 trillion. With the exception of the COVID-19 Pandemic that was very poorly handled by the Indian government, India’s economy has grown larger, and so too have its economic stakes in the event of a confrontation with any neighbour.

The multifactor macroeconomic model used in both studies (2025 post-Pahalgam and 2019 post-Pulwama) assessed aggregate output categories of consumption, government spending (civilian and military), investment, and foreign receipts, with key subcategories within each factor calculated and then normalised on a monthly basis. It was cautioned in 2019 that, if the damage were to approach anywhere near this mark, India would have faced a GDP decline of nearly 20 per cent, and a similar proportion today as well. This is an amount seldom seen in recent history, except in the cases of catastrophic economic dissolution as experienced in Argentina (2001) and Greece (2011) during peacetime, and Iraq (2003) and Libya (2011) in wartime. Even countries hit by the worst of COVID-19 would not countenance such destruction.

The greater number of roughly USD 750 billion today (3/4 of a trillion dollars) should not be surprising when seen in light of the nature of tallying the damage of war. A costing exercise of this sort is not merely a question of cheques issued by a government as war spending, but rather an estimation of the catastrophe arising from disrupted or destroyed human lives, military hardware, property, projects, markets, savings, morale, psychology, and any semblance of sanity in society.

At a time when India is aiming to draw greater investment from around the world, and negotiating tariffs, how would the course of fixed capital and financial investment proceed in the midst of a full-blown conventional war with a neighbour? How would economic activity maintain the semblance of normalcy? The damage to retail activity, to FDI, infrastructure projects, to internal and external commerce would be incomparably worse than even the darkest periods of South Asian history. This does not even begin to touch the ultimate fear — that of a very limited nuclear exchange, since the loss in that instance would be near-incalculable and long-term.

As we had noted previously, citing a 2019 example of how quickly losses are incurred in modern warfare, the reckless employment of the Indian Air force in operations when the Pakistan Air Force shot down two Indian fighters and a fratricide helicopter downed resulted in a loss of over USD 100 million in less than ten minutes of air action. As such, the ultimate figure in the study helps to frame India’s risks and stakes as a deterrent to further violence and conflict. As India’s economy has grown, so too has the glass house in which it sits. The dividends of India’s GDP growth on paper have gone almost exclusively to the top 5% of their society, with the bottom 51% majority holding barely  3 per cent of all economic assets. India has 1.2 billion poor people, and barely 2 million high income individuals, and the thin stratum of ‘middle class’ is calculated at an income of just USD 10 per day.

It is those teeming masses who would suffer the most as the Indian establishment works its people into a war frenzy that would cause devastation at the levels we have modelled out, if not worse. Yet the Indian jingoism of its ‘Billionaire Raj’ elite is fanning a hysteria after Pahalgam on their media that would annihilate their economic futures. They are threatening the water security of the region and playing fast and loose with longstanding water agreements that help address the requirements of nearly one billion people in the northern section of the subcontinent.

As it stands, India does not enjoy stable relations of trust with any of its neighbours, but as with the previous study, the updated calculation bolsters the very same claim: that peace must prevail in South Asia, for without it, the region cannot realise its full economic potential — certainly not while its largest member, India, repeatedly absolves itself of its responsibilities to its people, to its neighbours, and to the world at large.

Cooler heads must prevail, and India must dispassionately examine the consequences of three generations of militarised occupation of Jammu and Kashmir for its own future. With 1.5 million military and paramilitary personnel to tyrannize the Kashmiri people, and only to find the Kashmiris still mustering resistance to Indian atrocities, the futility of Indian policies requires a sober revision to move beyond imbroglios. Operation Swift Retort is a firm reminder of India’s failures and follies. The Indian leadership must be mindful of this and urge for peace and confidence-building, with mutual economic prosperity in mind. That is the only way through which the economic potential of the region can be redeemed and assured in the future.

Dr Usman W. Chohan is Advisor (Economic Affairs and National Development) at the Centre for Aerospace & Security Studies, Islamabad, Pakistan. The article was first published in The Nation. He can be reached at [email protected].


Share this article

Facebook
Twitter
LinkedIn

Recent Publications

Browse through the list of recent publications.

The US-Israel War on Iran: Objectives, Strategy, and Escalation Management

Zahra Niazi
‘States tend to overestimate themselves or the benefits and swiftness of war, and to underestimate their opponents’ capabilities, intentions, or the costs and duration of war.’ If anything, the 2026 war initiated by the United States and Israel against Iran shall be remembered in the annals of warfare among the most visible manifestations of this dynamic.
The war, immediately preceded by the January mass protests in Iran, did not represent a sudden rupture but rather the continuation of a 47-year-long confrontation and a more intense phase of the June 2025 war.
The US Secretary of War, Pete Hegseth, defined the war’s objectives as being laser-focused: to destroy Iran’s missile capabilities and its security infrastructure, while ensuring that it could never develop nuclear weapons. Beyond these stated objectives, among the priorities on the continuum also lay the objective of regime change, with both President Trump and Prime Minister Netanyahu explicitly calling on the Iranian population to take over the government at the outset of the war.

Read More »

Marka-e-Haq to the Peace Talks: Pakistan’s Middle Power Status

On 7th May 2025, Pakistan’s military forces took the international security community by surprise when it demonstrated operational superiority against its larger belligerent adversary India with its rapid and coordinated response. The Four-Day conflict proved to be a watershed moment for Pakistan, marking its rapid emergence as an important player in the region. In recent years, amidst the ongoing global competition between the United States and China, Islamabad has adopted a position of ’Strategic Balancing,’ where it maintains ties of cooperation with both Beijing and Washington. Deft diplomacy, emphasis on geo-economics, and credible conventional and strategic deterrence have remained the foundational pillars for Pakistan’s ambition as a rising middle power

Read More »

Debunking the S-400 Shield: Lessons from the India-Pakistan Conflict

Air defense has always been a central aspect of warfare. In South Asia, the phenomenon carries immense significance due to compressed reaction times. In this context, one of the most-hyped systems is the Russian-made S-400, touted by New Delhi as a one-stop solution to counter aerial threats from both Pakistan and China.
The 2025 conflict between India and Pakistan marked an important chapter in testing the S-400 technology. The conflict began on May 7, when India attacked what it alleged were terrorist targets in both Pakistani-held Kashmir and Pakistan proper, using drone and missile strikes. The conflict lasted for four days, culminating in a U.S-facilitated ceasefire. However, the brief conflict debunked a lot of the myths regarding the S-400 technology.
First, India claimed that the mobile S-400 would be able to control Pakistan’s airspace. In contrast, Pakistani aircraft continued to operate freely, according to official briefings by the Pakistani military. Although the Pakistan Air Force (PAF) aircraft were in their own airspace, they were still within the air defense range.

Read More »