13. Syed Ahmed Ali- ISB Dialouges-Oped thumbnail-May-2026-APP (1)

On 7th May 2025, Pakistan’s military forces took the international security community by surprise when it demonstrated operational superiority against its larger belligerent adversary India with its rapid and coordinated response.  The Four-Day conflict proved to be a watershed moment for Pakistan, marking its rapid emergence as an important player in the region. In recent years, amidst the ongoing global competition between the United States and China, Islamabad has adopted a position of ’Strategic Balancing,’ where it maintains ties of cooperation with both Beijing and Washington. Deft diplomacy, emphasis on geo-economics, and credible conventional and strategic deterrence have remained the foundational pillars for Pakistan’s ambition as a rising middle power.

Operation Marka-e-Haq was a pivotal moment in Pakistan’s recent rise, establishing its credibility as a peer adversary to India by shooting down seven aircraft and striking 26 targets deep inside enemy territory. The May conflict boosted the stature of PAF and broke the myth of the superiority of western platforms. This provided a unique opportunity for Pakistan to expand its footprint in the global arms market, with JF-17 emerging as one of the major defence platforms in demand. The ‘thunder’ is currently operated in Nigeria and Myanmar, and reportedly Azerbaijan has also signed a deal worth 4.8 billion dollars for 40 aircraft.  Pakistan’s defence exports are emerging as a strategic alternative to high-end 4th– and 5th-generation aircraft, which are typically out of reach for developing countries, making Islamabad an important player in the global arms market.

Following Pakistan’s victory in May India found itself isolated, as New Delhi appealed to the international community regarding Islamabad’s alleged complicity in Pahalgam terror attacks. The attempt failed as Congress leader Mani Shankar Aiyar criticised Shashi Tharoor stating that none of the 33 countries including the United Nations (UN) held Pakistan responsible. India’s diplomatic challenges were further exacerbated by Pakistan’s recent strategic partnership with Middle Eastern countries most notably Iran and Saudi Arabia. In August 2025, Prime Minister Shehbaz Sharif supported Tehran’s right to enrich uranium under a peaceful nuclear program. In September 25, the Strategic Mutual Defence Agreement (SMDA) was signed, which deepened Saudi-Pakistan ties as Islamabad became a direct security share holder in the region. Many commentators view this regional alignment as a counter to the India-Middle East Europe Economic Corridor (IMEC), arguing that Pakistan is steadily establishing itself as a net security provider in the region. Apart from these consecutive back to back diplomatic victories, Pakistan has adopted a nuanced approach to its tenuous Western border mixing kinetic and diplomatic solutions against the banned outfit Tehrik-e-Taliban Pakistan (TTP). The failure of the Afghan government to take action prompted the Pakistani military to conduct Operation Ghazab Lil-Haq. The military offensive has reportedly led to the killing of 796 insurgents while simultaneous engaging with Kabul through negotiations held in Urumqi mediated by China.  Bolstering its national security, has given Pakistan political space to pivot to the Middle East and act as a regional stabilising force in the region.

Islamabad’s decision to diversify its relations proved prudent and positioned Pakistan to play the role of a mediator between Washington and Tehran. Pakistan emerged as a natural choice not only because it has stable ties with Turkey, Iran, US and the Gulf States, but also because it is capable of providing security for diplomats in Tehran. The Iran-US-Israel war has been particularly deadly for the Iranian officials who have been a victim of systematic decapitation strikes, creating a serious hurdle for negotiations as mutual trust has eroded. To ensure the security of the Iranians, Pakistan reportedly deployed approximately two dozen jets as well its Airborne Warning and Control System (AWECS) to guard against Israeli threats. The dialogue in Islamabad is particularly significant as it signals a shift from Doha and Ankara to Islamabad which have traditionally long been the capitals of international diplomacy in the Middle East. For Pakistan, regional stability is vital as it would provide a unique opportunity to act as a bridge connecting South Asia, Central Asia and Middle East, effectively becoming a fulcrum of the region.

Pakistan has come a long way since the conflict with India last year. Today its rise as a middle power largely rests on two main pillars. Firstly, through strategic balancing, Islamabad attempts to manoeuvre between Washington, Beijing, Moscow, Ankara, Tehran, Riyadh, and London. By having diverse relations, Pakistan has more strategic options for maximising its state autonomy. Secondly, Pakistan has adopted a ‘Hard State Approach.’ This entails no compromise on state sovereignty. This approach is more recently visible in Operation Ghazab Lil-Haq against the Afghan Taliban. With emphasis on state sovereignty and a careful balance of foreign relations, Pakistan is well  poised to make its mark in the region.

Syed Ahmed Ali is a Research Assistant at the Centre for Aerospace & Security Studies (CASS), in Islamabad, Pakistan.The article was first published in Pakistan Observer. He can be reached at [email protected]


Share this article

Facebook
Twitter
LinkedIn

Recent Publications

Browse through the list of recent publications.

The US-Israel War on Iran: Objectives, Strategy, and Escalation Management

Zahra Niazi
‘States tend to overestimate themselves or the benefits and swiftness of war, and to underestimate their opponents’ capabilities, intentions, or the costs and duration of war.’ If anything, the 2026 war initiated by the United States and Israel against Iran shall be remembered in the annals of warfare among the most visible manifestations of this dynamic.
The war, immediately preceded by the January mass protests in Iran, did not represent a sudden rupture but rather the continuation of a 47-year-long confrontation and a more intense phase of the June 2025 war.
The US Secretary of War, Pete Hegseth, defined the war’s objectives as being laser-focused: to destroy Iran’s missile capabilities and its security infrastructure, while ensuring that it could never develop nuclear weapons. Beyond these stated objectives, among the priorities on the continuum also lay the objective of regime change, with both President Trump and Prime Minister Netanyahu explicitly calling on the Iranian population to take over the government at the outset of the war.

Read More »

Debunking the S-400 Shield: Lessons from the India-Pakistan Conflict

Air defense has always been a central aspect of warfare. In South Asia, the phenomenon carries immense significance due to compressed reaction times. In this context, one of the most-hyped systems is the Russian-made S-400, touted by New Delhi as a one-stop solution to counter aerial threats from both Pakistan and China.
The 2025 conflict between India and Pakistan marked an important chapter in testing the S-400 technology. The conflict began on May 7, when India attacked what it alleged were terrorist targets in both Pakistani-held Kashmir and Pakistan proper, using drone and missile strikes. The conflict lasted for four days, culminating in a U.S-facilitated ceasefire. However, the brief conflict debunked a lot of the myths regarding the S-400 technology.
First, India claimed that the mobile S-400 would be able to control Pakistan’s airspace. In contrast, Pakistani aircraft continued to operate freely, according to official briefings by the Pakistani military. Although the Pakistan Air Force (PAF) aircraft were in their own airspace, they were still within the air defense range.

Read More »

The Air War of May 2025: Every Kill Verified

On 7 May 2025, 114 combat aircraft clashed in what has been described as one of the largest beyond visual range (BVR) air engagements since WWII During the 52-minute aerial battle triggered by India’s Operation Sindoor, traditional visual confirmation of kills became difficult. Missile impacts occurred at unprecedented ranges from 160 km to 190 km, often beyond the horizon, while claims and counter-claims continued to spread rapidly across social media platforms, amplified by unverified facts and AI-produced imageries. Amid this torrent of conflicting claims, determining what actually happened was as disputed as the battle itself.
Amidst this fog of confusion, Pakistan’s clear and unambiguous claims backed by published evidence as well as openness to independent verification provided a welcome breath of clarity. As the prevalence of BVR battles increases and the spread of disinformation continues to outpace verified data in shaping both domestic opinion and international perceptions

Read More »