08. Syed Ahmed Ali-Sil-China-Eco-Tech-Oped thumbnail-July-2025-APP

Warfare is no longer defined by traditional firepower, but by information in the form of satellites, fibre optics, and silicon chips. The modern battlefield demands weapons that are long-ranged, accurate, dynamic, and intelligent. These weapons are supported by tech ecosystems that provide essential services, making such capabilities a reality. For decades, the United States has dominated the technological ecosystem. This has enabled Washington to degrade the capabilities of its adversaries. However, as China’s ascendancy unfolds, the US finds its technological supremacy challenged. China’s burgeoning tech ecosystem is increasingly viewed as a viable alternative to American technology dependence, which is slowly shifting the global balance of power.

The Chinese military-industrial complex (MIC) has come a long way from self-sufficiency, to indigenisation, to becoming a major player in the arms market. Currently, 4 out of the 10 largest defence companies are Chinese. These companies are producing equipment like VT-4 main battle tanks, J-20 stealth fighter jets, Dong Feng (DF-21D / DF-26) anti-ship ballistic missiles, and the HQ-9 (Hong Qi) air defence system. China also has the largest shipbuilding industry, whose capacity is 230 times larger than the US. However, despite the impressive might of the Chinese MIC, only a handful of states import its products. 61% of China’s total arms exports go to a single country: Pakistan.

Pakistan’s regional security challenges have compelled it to import arms from China and collaborate on projects like the JF‑17. Recent deployment of the Chinese J‑10C under Operation Bunyan-un-Marsoos demonstrated the platform’s combat effectiveness, rattling the international arms market and proving that Chinese weaponry can rival Western systems. This growing credibility of Chinese weapons has enabled the country to penetrate new markets. Iran has recently shown interest in purchasing Chinese J-10Cs in an attempt to rebuild its air force and reduce dependence on Western weapons systems.

Modern weapon systems, such as missiles, rely on satellite systems for navigation and situational awareness. For much of the late 20th Century, most military powers were vulnerable to US satellite jamming capabilities due to their reliance on GPS (Global Positioning System). China experienced this firsthand when GPS interference caused one of its ballistic missiles to overshoot during the third Taiwan Strait Crisis. Understanding their vulnerability, the Chinese started their own global navigation project in 1994 called ‘BeiDou’. China launched its first BeiDou satellites in 2000, which provided navigation services exclusively to the mainland. In 2022, the constellation expanded to 45 satellites, 30 of which are third-generation satellites that serve over 1.1 billion people. 

BeiDou has become an alternative navigation system to the GPS. China currently shares military-grade access to its BeiDou satellite navigation system with Pakistan, Iran and Russia. Iran in particular, due to its hostility towards Israel, is vulnerable to the US global navigation system. To secure itself, Iran signed an agreement in 2021 to gain military grade access to BeiDou.  As a result, in April 2024, Iranian missiles saw a remarkable improvement in their accuracy landing within metres of their Israeli target. States are rushing towards the BeiDou, not only because of its technological sophistication but because it represents strategic autonomy from Washington.

China has not only established an independent technological ecosystem in space but has also mirrored this approach on land by developing a self-reliant supply chain for rare earth minerals. It dominates the industry: extracts 70% of global rare earth minerals, refines 85% of them, and manufactures 90% of rare earth magnets. This is particularly significant as these minerals are essential for production of modern weapons like hypersonic missiles, F-35’s, and nuclear submarines.

With the ongoing trade-tariff war between Washington and Beijing, the Chinese government imposed export control restrictions on rare earth minerals in April. The Chinese government has a wide arsenal of tools to challenge the White House in this trade war, such as licensing restrictions, tariffs, export quotas, or outright bans. Such measures represent a significant risk to US national security, as these policies may jeopardise its MIC supply chain. This can be particularly troubling for the US as it effectively means that Washington and its allies will not be able engage in long-drawn-out conflicts that deplete their arsenal.

The Chinese military-industrial complex, satellite system and rare earth minerals offer a viable route of strategic autonomy from the US tech ecosystem. It gives states the liberty to pursue policies that Washington frowns upon. China, with a dominant hold over the rare earth mineral industry, has a secure supply line for its high-tech industry. This allows Beijing to outproduce the US and supply its allies with critical weapon systems. The only constraints China faces are a smaller customer base and establishing credibility at par with US weapon systems. With the recent battlefield success of Chinese systems such as PL-15 and BeiDou, this gap is closing fast.

Syed Ahmed Ali is a Research Assistant at the Centre for Aerospace & Security Studies (CASS), in Islamabad, Pakistan. He can be reached at [email protected]


Share this article

Facebook
Twitter
LinkedIn

Recent Publications

Browse through the list of recent publications.

The US-Israel War on Iran: Objectives, Strategy, and Escalation Management

Zahra Niazi
‘States tend to overestimate themselves or the benefits and swiftness of war, and to underestimate their opponents’ capabilities, intentions, or the costs and duration of war.’ If anything, the 2026 war initiated by the United States and Israel against Iran shall be remembered in the annals of warfare among the most visible manifestations of this dynamic.
The war, immediately preceded by the January mass protests in Iran, did not represent a sudden rupture but rather the continuation of a 47-year-long confrontation and a more intense phase of the June 2025 war.
The US Secretary of War, Pete Hegseth, defined the war’s objectives as being laser-focused: to destroy Iran’s missile capabilities and its security infrastructure, while ensuring that it could never develop nuclear weapons. Beyond these stated objectives, among the priorities on the continuum also lay the objective of regime change, with both President Trump and Prime Minister Netanyahu explicitly calling on the Iranian population to take over the government at the outset of the war.

Read More »

Marka-e-Haq to the Peace Talks: Pakistan’s Middle Power Status

On 7th May 2025, Pakistan’s military forces took the international security community by surprise when it demonstrated operational superiority against its larger belligerent adversary India with its rapid and coordinated response. The Four-Day conflict proved to be a watershed moment for Pakistan, marking its rapid emergence as an important player in the region. In recent years, amidst the ongoing global competition between the United States and China, Islamabad has adopted a position of ’Strategic Balancing,’ where it maintains ties of cooperation with both Beijing and Washington. Deft diplomacy, emphasis on geo-economics, and credible conventional and strategic deterrence have remained the foundational pillars for Pakistan’s ambition as a rising middle power

Read More »

Debunking the S-400 Shield: Lessons from the India-Pakistan Conflict

Air defense has always been a central aspect of warfare. In South Asia, the phenomenon carries immense significance due to compressed reaction times. In this context, one of the most-hyped systems is the Russian-made S-400, touted by New Delhi as a one-stop solution to counter aerial threats from both Pakistan and China.
The 2025 conflict between India and Pakistan marked an important chapter in testing the S-400 technology. The conflict began on May 7, when India attacked what it alleged were terrorist targets in both Pakistani-held Kashmir and Pakistan proper, using drone and missile strikes. The conflict lasted for four days, culminating in a U.S-facilitated ceasefire. However, the brief conflict debunked a lot of the myths regarding the S-400 technology.
First, India claimed that the mobile S-400 would be able to control Pakistan’s airspace. In contrast, Pakistani aircraft continued to operate freely, according to official briefings by the Pakistani military. Although the Pakistan Air Force (PAF) aircraft were in their own airspace, they were still within the air defense range.

Read More »