Usman-Haider-Rus-Urk-Win-Oped-thumbnail-Dec-2024

The latest Russian offensive in the eastern Donetsk region targets the strategically important city of Pokrovsk. To this end, Russian forces captured the rural town of Hrodivka a few weeks ago. This is a part of Kremlin’s broader strategy to take control of as much of Kyiv’s territory as possible before winter impedes the ground offensive. On the other hand, Ukraine seems committed to holding its positions, including the ones inside Russian territory, and avoid incurring further losses. Both sides realise the importance of captured territories which could be used as bargaining chips for future negotiated settlements. The possibility of a truce remains alive with Donald Trump winning the 2024 US Presidential election.

While the war nears its third year, the impact of approaching winter looms large on both sides. Rainfall associated with the early winter season is expected to affect operations due to muddy conditions which reduces manoeuvrability and slows down troops and vehicles. Once snowfall begins, sub-zero temperatures and piles of snow will make it difficult to establish new defensive positions as digging trenches becomes a highly challenging task. In addition, barren trees limit natural camouflage, leaving soldiers more exposed to enemy firepower.

Kremlin’s current military strategy focuses on three key objectives: take back control of the Kursk region, further advance inside Ukraine, and intensify pressure on Kyiv’s forces stationed along the international border. In the Kursk region, the on-ground situation suggests that Moscow is making significant progress, having reclaimed 46 percent of the captured territory, with Vovchenko being the latest village to fall to Russian forces. Meanwhile, the Russian troops continue to put pressure on Ukrainian defences to break through their frontlines and regain control of the remaining territory.

In a bid to advance further into Ukrainian territory, Russian combat troops are prioritising the swift capture of Pokrovsk. The city hosts a key regional logistics base, and its fall would heavily influence the battle on the Eastern front. If Pokrovsk is taken, it would mark a major setback for Ukraine, opening the path for Russian forces to push deeper into the remaining Donetsk region.

President-elect Trump has consistently voiced his opposition to the ongoing conflict pledging to prioritise a swift resolution. In this context, he has urged both sides to seek peace and bring an end to hostilities. Trump suggested that President Zelenskyy focus on achieving peace rather than reclaiming lost Ukrainian territory. In response, Zelenskyy expressed Ukraine’s hope to end the conflict through diplomacy by the following year. Similarly, Trump engaged with President Putin, advising him to embrace peace and avoid further escalation.

Amid the uncertainties of weather and politics, the real challenge lies in determining the future of this protracted war. As the battlefield evolves, two outcomes seem most likely: a prolonged conflict or a Russian victory – both leaving Ukraine at a disadvantage.

The chances for an outright Ukrainian victory are slim as its beleaguered forces are not in a position to launch a successful counteroffensive to oust Russian troops. Even if Ukraine chooses to resist, it lacks the necessary manpower and resources to match Russia’s war stamina. It is a grinding war of attrition that Ukraine is unlikely to sustain especially as the West appears to be losing interest in its support.

As hopes for Ukrainian success diminish, maintaining Western support – critical for Ukraine’s survival – has become increasingly difficult. Meanwhile, Russia has ramped up its war industry output, positioning itself to endure and prevail in a prolonged conflict. Amid these challenges, there is a growing acceptance among the Ukrainian population for peace talks with Russia, as reflected in polls conducted a few months ago.

The next few months are crucial for the ongoing conflict. Harsh winter conditions in Ukraine, coupled with  Donald Trump’s re-election, could play a decisive role in the protracted conflict. Ultimately, both sides may have to agree to a hard negotiated settlement to avoid further losses which have already taken a heavy toll.

Usman Haider is a Research Assistant at the Centre for Aerospace & Security Studies (CASS), Islamabad, Pakistan. He can be reached at: [email protected].


Share this article

Facebook
Twitter
LinkedIn

Recent Publications

Browse through the list of recent publications.

The Cover-up: IAF Narrative of the May 2025 Air Battle

Even after one year since the India-Pakistan May war of 2025, the Indian discourse regarding Operation Sindoor remains uncertain under its pretence of restraint. The Pahalgam attack on 22 April, which killed 26 people, triggered an escalatory spiral. New Delhi quickly accused Pakistan-linked elements, while Islamabad refuted the allegation and demanded an independent investigation. On 7 May, India launched attacks deep inside Pakistan under what it later termed as Operation Sindoor. The political motive was intended to turn the crisis into coercive signalling by shifting the blame onto the enemy and projecting a sense of military superiority.
This episode, however, began to fray immediately as war seldom follows the intended script. Within minutes PAF shot down 7 IAF aircraft including 4 Rafales. On 8 May, Reuters reported that at least two Indian aircraft were shot down by a Pakistani J-10C, while the local government sources reported other aircraft crashes in Indian-occupied Jammu and Kashmir

Read More »

Why the IAF’s Post-Sindoor Spending Surge is a Sign of Panic

After Operation Sindoor, India is spending billions of dollars on new weapons. This is being taken by many people as an indication of military prowess. It is not. This rush to procure weapons is in fact an acknowledgement that the Air Force in India had failed to do what it was meant to do. The costly jets and missiles that India had purchased over the years failed to yield the promised results.

Sindoor was soon followed by India in sealing the gaps which the operation had exposed. It was reported that Indian Air Force (IAF) is looking to speed up its purchases of more than 7 billion USD. This will involve other Rafale fighter jets with India already ordering 26 more Rafales to the Navy in 2024 at an estimated cost of about 3.9 billion USD. India is also seeking long-range standoff missiles, Israeli loitering munitions and increased drone capabilities. Special financial powers of the Indian military were activated to issue emergency procurement orders. The magnitude and rate of these purchases speak volumes.

Indian media and defence analysts have over the years considered the Rafale as a game changer. When India purchased 36 Rafales aircrafts at an approximate cost of 8.7 billion USD, analysts vowed that the aircraft would provide India with air superiority over Pakistan. Operation Sindoor disproved all those allegations. Indian aircraft did not even fly in Pakistani airspace when the fighting started. India solely depended on standoff weapons that were launched at a safe distance. The air defence system of Pakistan, comprising of the HQ-9 surface-to-air missile system and its own fighters, stood its ground.

Read More »

May 2025: Mosaic Warfare and the Myth of Centralised Air Power

Visualise a modern-day Air Force commander sitting in the operations room, miles away from the combat zone, overseeing every friendly and enemy aircraft and all assets involved in the campaign. In a split second, he can task a fighter, reposition a drone, and authorise a strike. In today’s promising technological era, he does not even need an operations room; a laptop on his desktop will suffice. The situation looks promising as it offers efficiency, precision, and control. The term used for such operational control is ‘centralisation’, which has been made possible with advanced networking, integrating space, cyber, surveillance, artificial intelligence, and seamless communication, enabling a single commander to manage an entire campaign from a single node. Centralised command and control, championed by the Western air forces and then adopted by many others, has thus been seen as a pinnacle of modern military power.
The concept of centralisation, enabled by state-of-the-art networking, may seem promising, but it is nothing more than a myth.

Read More »