Usman-Haider-Rus-Urk-Win-Oped-thumbnail-Dec-2024

The latest Russian offensive in the eastern Donetsk region targets the strategically important city of Pokrovsk. To this end, Russian forces captured the rural town of Hrodivka a few weeks ago. This is a part of Kremlin’s broader strategy to take control of as much of Kyiv’s territory as possible before winter impedes the ground offensive. On the other hand, Ukraine seems committed to holding its positions, including the ones inside Russian territory, and avoid incurring further losses. Both sides realise the importance of captured territories which could be used as bargaining chips for future negotiated settlements. The possibility of a truce remains alive with Donald Trump winning the 2024 US Presidential election.

While the war nears its third year, the impact of approaching winter looms large on both sides. Rainfall associated with the early winter season is expected to affect operations due to muddy conditions which reduces manoeuvrability and slows down troops and vehicles. Once snowfall begins, sub-zero temperatures and piles of snow will make it difficult to establish new defensive positions as digging trenches becomes a highly challenging task. In addition, barren trees limit natural camouflage, leaving soldiers more exposed to enemy firepower.

Kremlin’s current military strategy focuses on three key objectives: take back control of the Kursk region, further advance inside Ukraine, and intensify pressure on Kyiv’s forces stationed along the international border. In the Kursk region, the on-ground situation suggests that Moscow is making significant progress, having reclaimed 46 percent of the captured territory, with Vovchenko being the latest village to fall to Russian forces. Meanwhile, the Russian troops continue to put pressure on Ukrainian defences to break through their frontlines and regain control of the remaining territory.

In a bid to advance further into Ukrainian territory, Russian combat troops are prioritising the swift capture of Pokrovsk. The city hosts a key regional logistics base, and its fall would heavily influence the battle on the Eastern front. If Pokrovsk is taken, it would mark a major setback for Ukraine, opening the path for Russian forces to push deeper into the remaining Donetsk region.

President-elect Trump has consistently voiced his opposition to the ongoing conflict pledging to prioritise a swift resolution. In this context, he has urged both sides to seek peace and bring an end to hostilities. Trump suggested that President Zelenskyy focus on achieving peace rather than reclaiming lost Ukrainian territory. In response, Zelenskyy expressed Ukraine’s hope to end the conflict through diplomacy by the following year. Similarly, Trump engaged with President Putin, advising him to embrace peace and avoid further escalation.

Amid the uncertainties of weather and politics, the real challenge lies in determining the future of this protracted war. As the battlefield evolves, two outcomes seem most likely: a prolonged conflict or a Russian victory – both leaving Ukraine at a disadvantage.

The chances for an outright Ukrainian victory are slim as its beleaguered forces are not in a position to launch a successful counteroffensive to oust Russian troops. Even if Ukraine chooses to resist, it lacks the necessary manpower and resources to match Russia’s war stamina. It is a grinding war of attrition that Ukraine is unlikely to sustain especially as the West appears to be losing interest in its support.

As hopes for Ukrainian success diminish, maintaining Western support – critical for Ukraine’s survival – has become increasingly difficult. Meanwhile, Russia has ramped up its war industry output, positioning itself to endure and prevail in a prolonged conflict. Amid these challenges, there is a growing acceptance among the Ukrainian population for peace talks with Russia, as reflected in polls conducted a few months ago.

The next few months are crucial for the ongoing conflict. Harsh winter conditions in Ukraine, coupled with  Donald Trump’s re-election, could play a decisive role in the protracted conflict. Ultimately, both sides may have to agree to a hard negotiated settlement to avoid further losses which have already taken a heavy toll.

Usman Haider is a Research Assistant at the Centre for Aerospace & Security Studies (CASS), Islamabad, Pakistan. He can be reached at: [email protected].


Share this article

Facebook
Twitter
LinkedIn

Recent Publications

Browse through the list of recent publications.

The US-Israel War on Iran: Objectives, Strategy, and Escalation Management

Zahra Niazi
‘States tend to overestimate themselves or the benefits and swiftness of war, and to underestimate their opponents’ capabilities, intentions, or the costs and duration of war.’ If anything, the 2026 war initiated by the United States and Israel against Iran shall be remembered in the annals of warfare among the most visible manifestations of this dynamic.
The war, immediately preceded by the January mass protests in Iran, did not represent a sudden rupture but rather the continuation of a 47-year-long confrontation and a more intense phase of the June 2025 war.
The US Secretary of War, Pete Hegseth, defined the war’s objectives as being laser-focused: to destroy Iran’s missile capabilities and its security infrastructure, while ensuring that it could never develop nuclear weapons. Beyond these stated objectives, among the priorities on the continuum also lay the objective of regime change, with both President Trump and Prime Minister Netanyahu explicitly calling on the Iranian population to take over the government at the outset of the war.

Read More »

Marka-e-Haq to the Peace Talks: Pakistan’s Middle Power Status

On 7th May 2025, Pakistan’s military forces took the international security community by surprise when it demonstrated operational superiority against its larger belligerent adversary India with its rapid and coordinated response. The Four-Day conflict proved to be a watershed moment for Pakistan, marking its rapid emergence as an important player in the region. In recent years, amidst the ongoing global competition between the United States and China, Islamabad has adopted a position of ’Strategic Balancing,’ where it maintains ties of cooperation with both Beijing and Washington. Deft diplomacy, emphasis on geo-economics, and credible conventional and strategic deterrence have remained the foundational pillars for Pakistan’s ambition as a rising middle power

Read More »

Debunking the S-400 Shield: Lessons from the India-Pakistan Conflict

Air defense has always been a central aspect of warfare. In South Asia, the phenomenon carries immense significance due to compressed reaction times. In this context, one of the most-hyped systems is the Russian-made S-400, touted by New Delhi as a one-stop solution to counter aerial threats from both Pakistan and China.
The 2025 conflict between India and Pakistan marked an important chapter in testing the S-400 technology. The conflict began on May 7, when India attacked what it alleged were terrorist targets in both Pakistani-held Kashmir and Pakistan proper, using drone and missile strikes. The conflict lasted for four days, culminating in a U.S-facilitated ceasefire. However, the brief conflict debunked a lot of the myths regarding the S-400 technology.
First, India claimed that the mobile S-400 would be able to control Pakistan’s airspace. In contrast, Pakistani aircraft continued to operate freely, according to official briefings by the Pakistani military. Although the Pakistan Air Force (PAF) aircraft were in their own airspace, they were still within the air defense range.

Read More »