Shah Muhammad-Dig-Twi-Aer-Oped thumbnail-Sep-2024-AP

The ‘blurring of boundaries’ between physical entities and digital models is one of the hallmarks of the Fourth Industrial Revolution driven by advancements in technologies such as the Internet of Things (IoT), Artificial Intelligence (AI), robotics, and digital twins. Fascination associated with the idea of creating replicas is now gaining substantial viability. Around 70 percent of top executives at technology enterprises are exploring and investing in digital twin technology. This essentially refers to the creation of a digital replica of a physical object, enabling virtual and real-time mirroring of the object through smart sensors. The digital replica or virtual model undertakes real-time monitoring, simulations and diagnostics of the physical object (its twin) to enhance its operations. Given that aerospace is at the forefront of technological advancements, it is crucial to analyse digital twin technology in this sector.

From design to manufacturing, digital twins could augment development of aircraft at various stages. In this regard, Airbus’s virtual model of its A350 XWB aircraft is a prominent example. It facilitates real-time monitoring and analysis of factors such as fuel consumption and engine efficiency. Data analytics associated with virtual modelling augments decision-making of operators, leading to upgradation of aircraft’s operational efficiency. Furthermore, the IntelligentEngine vision of Rolls-Royce is characterised, in part, by digital twins to undertake predictive maintenance and simulations of their pioneering aero engines. Being at the forefront of the commercial space race, SpaceX is also capitalising on this technology to generate virtual replicas of its Dragon spacecraft. Operators at Mission Control are substantially equipped to keep tabs on the propulsion systems and orbital flight of the aircraft. Digital twin technology essentially complements SpaceX’s endeavors to upgrade the performance and safety of its spacecraft.

This technology not only improves energy efficiency but also resonates with environmental sustainability. Through its effective adoption of digital twins, Airbus was able to cut emissions by 1250 tonnes and conserve energy worth 3.65 GWh annually. Needless to say, optimisation of energy efficiency would eventually entail cost reduction for aerospace companies. Integration of digital twin technology with Big Data, AI and the IoT may considerably add to these advantages while raising the magnitude of a digital replica’s viability.

One needs to be cautious though as excessive reliance on large data sets could imperil data management involved in virtual models, particularly when there is little integration of advanced storage and processing systems. Improper data handling could undermine accuracy and reliability of virtual models of physical aircraft. Secondly, linkages with multiple data sources could act as caveats vis-Ă¡-vis cyber threats. Data breach and subsequent tampering could take a toll on operational efficiency and safety of a physical aircraft. In this regard, it is unclear if aerospace companies are building their own cyber defences or hiring third-party cybersecurity firms. Thirdly, components and tools utilised in the development of digital twin technology are acquired from different sources. Therefore, there might be complexities in terms of compatibility and seamless integration of various components. This is essentially known as the interoperability problem in virtual models.

A series of well-directed endeavours may be undertaken to prevent this technology from hitting a snag. AI-enabled systems could significantly upgrade data processing and analysis, paving the way for precise real-time mirroring and effective data management. Machine Learning (ML) can spontaneously flag inconsistencies in data and improve accuracy as well as reliability of virtual replicas. Additionally, certain key cybersecurity measures such as cryptographic advancements and regular security audits could enlarge the digital walls of cyber defence. Collaboration with cybersecurity experts and regular training of employees would also go a long way in terms of protecting digital twins from unauthorised access. With regard to the interoperability problem, companies and stakeholders would be well-advised to develop coherence and standardisation in the development of digital twins. This may actualise seamless integration and compatibility among different components of this technology.

Digital twins have the potential to acquire greater traction in the aerospace sector in the future. It would not be an exaggeration to argue that virtual models could revolutionise this sector. Although implementation of this technology continues to be marred by various irritants, a series of technical and operational measures might offset the challenges and elevate its viability in the aerospace sector. In essence, the future of aerospace could be characterised by a dynamic interplay between digital twins, AI and IoT.

Shah Muhammad is a Research Assistant at the Centre for Aerospace & Security Studies (CASS) in Islamabad, Pakistan. The article was first published in Modern Diplomacy. He can be reached at [email protected].


Share this article

Facebook
Twitter
LinkedIn

Recent Publications

Browse through the list of recent publications.

The Cover-up: IAF Narrative of the May 2025 Air Battle

Even after one year since the India-Pakistan May war of 2025, the Indian discourse regarding Operation Sindoor remains uncertain under its pretence of restraint. The Pahalgam attack on 22 April, which killed 26 people, triggered an escalatory spiral. New Delhi quickly accused Pakistan-linked elements, while Islamabad refuted the allegation and demanded an independent investigation. On 7 May, India launched attacks deep inside Pakistan under what it later termed as Operation Sindoor. The political motive was intended to turn the crisis into coercive signalling by shifting the blame onto the enemy and projecting a sense of military superiority.
This episode, however, began to fray immediately as war seldom follows the intended script. Within minutes PAF shot down 7 IAF aircraft including 4 Rafales. On 8 May, Reuters reported that at least two Indian aircraft were shot down by a Pakistani J-10C, while the local government sources reported other aircraft crashes in Indian-occupied Jammu and Kashmir

Read More »

Why the IAF’s Post-Sindoor Spending Surge is a Sign of Panic

After Operation Sindoor, India is spending billions of dollars on new weapons. This is being taken by many people as an indication of military prowess. It is not. This rush to procure weapons is in fact an acknowledgement that the Air Force in India had failed to do what it was meant to do. The costly jets and missiles that India had purchased over the years failed to yield the promised results.

Sindoor was soon followed by India in sealing the gaps which the operation had exposed. It was reported that Indian Air Force (IAF) is looking to speed up its purchases of more than 7 billion USD. This will involve other Rafale fighter jets with India already ordering 26 more Rafales to the Navy in 2024 at an estimated cost of about 3.9 billion USD. India is also seeking long-range standoff missiles, Israeli loitering munitions and increased drone capabilities. Special financial powers of the Indian military were activated to issue emergency procurement orders. The magnitude and rate of these purchases speak volumes.

Indian media and defence analysts have over the years considered the Rafale as a game changer. When India purchased 36 Rafales aircrafts at an approximate cost of 8.7 billion USD, analysts vowed that the aircraft would provide India with air superiority over Pakistan. Operation Sindoor disproved all those allegations. Indian aircraft did not even fly in Pakistani airspace when the fighting started. India solely depended on standoff weapons that were launched at a safe distance. The air defence system of Pakistan, comprising of the HQ-9 surface-to-air missile system and its own fighters, stood its ground.

Read More »

May 2025: Mosaic Warfare and the Myth of Centralised Air Power

Visualise a modern-day Air Force commander sitting in the operations room, miles away from the combat zone, overseeing every friendly and enemy aircraft and all assets involved in the campaign. In a split second, he can task a fighter, reposition a drone, and authorise a strike. In today’s promising technological era, he does not even need an operations room; a laptop on his desktop will suffice. The situation looks promising as it offers efficiency, precision, and control. The term used for such operational control is ‘centralisation’, which has been made possible with advanced networking, integrating space, cyber, surveillance, artificial intelligence, and seamless communication, enabling a single commander to manage an entire campaign from a single node. Centralised command and control, championed by the Western air forces and then adopted by many others, has thus been seen as a pinnacle of modern military power.
The concept of centralisation, enabled by state-of-the-art networking, may seem promising, but it is nothing more than a myth.

Read More »