Shaheer Ahmad-Rus-Arc-Dro-Oped thumbnail-Sep-2024-AP

With the outburst of the Russia-Ukraine war and the seismic effects of climate change, the Arctic is once again in the geopolitical spotlight. The growing accessibility to the untapped hydrocarbon reserves and increased maritime traffic along the Northern Sea Route (NSR) has catalysed the ante for strategic competition in the northern frontier of the globe. Russia, a geographical behemoth owning nearly 53 percent of the Arctic territory, is striving to dominate the geopolitical chessboard by building oil and gas terminals and refurbishing its Cold War-era military bases. These unprecedented developments provide a befitting context for drones that can bridge security gaps, undertake long-range ISR missions, and cast a protective dome to secure Russia’s Arctic infrastructure amidst dropping Celsius.

The ongoing Ukraine war has impinged the Arctic region, which was largely unscathed from geopolitical happenings in the recent past. A notable development that captured attention in this regard was a drone attack on Olenya airfield which inflicted significant damage to Russia’s Tu-22 bomber, followed by another unmanned attack in the Murmansk region. Proximity of the targeted area to the Kola Peninsula – home to Russia’s second-strike capability – has prompted increased security measures around its bastion-based deterrent and nearby military infrastructure in the High North. Likewise, Ukraine’s relentless attacks on Russia’s energy infrastructure, raise concerns regarding the safety of key projects like Yamal and Arctic LNG-2, prompting Moscow to increase security measures around its energy assets along the Arctic coastal rim.

To enhance security and maintain constant oversight, Russia is deploying its Arctic drone squadrons to safeguard critical infrastructure. The cobweb of Zala, Inokhodets, and Forpost drones are designed to patrol remote terrain in extreme blizzards and dropping temperatures. Back in 2021, Russia earmarked USD 52 million to a jet-powered Sukhoi-S-70 Okhotnik stealth drone (with full deployment planned for this year), which can efficiently perform at the frosty temperature of -12oC. Stationing these unmanned systems constitutes part of Russia’s virtual net of high-tech military systems which will likely strengthen its perimeter defence, enhance domain awareness, conduct long-range ISR missions, and cast a monitoring net able to track and detect any ‘unwanted guests’ along its Arctic coast. Drones are a cutting-edge tool for Russia in the Arctic that can enhance operational efficiency by minimising the cost of crewed military assets. Besides this, long-range drones, like the S-70, will likely assist the Russian Air Force (VKS) in undertaking complex air campaigns, posing grim threats to NATO’s airborne early warning (AEW) systems, air refueling assets, and joint surveillance target attack radar (JSTAR) systems.

Despite the sheer optimism attached to the Arctic drones, these unmanned agents come with a minefield of challenges. To pursue its Arctic ambitions, Russia is deploying drones as part of its broader strategy to establish a network of military installations, enabling swift responses to the increasing military capabilities of the US and NATO allies on its western flank. However, this expansion comes at a time when Western sanctions and the war in Ukraine are hampering Russia’s military modernisation efforts, particularly affecting its land forces in the High North. This has implications for Russia’s Arctic force readiness and preparedness for a conflict in its northernmost expanse The harsh icebound weather, with gusting storms and freezing temperatures possibly to -50oC in some areas, may also hinder drones’ operational efficiency to monitor distant waters and vast swaths of snow. Such a scenario has, in turn, implications for the reconnaissance and long-range patrolling tasks in the harsh environment. In addition, total darkness of polar nights and treacherous satellite communications in far-flung areas could impede autonomous operations if the link between the drone and its operator is disrupted. Furthermore, potential deployment of long-range drones, particularly the S-70 – Russian variant of the ‘loyal wingman’ – is also likely to intensify the security dilemma between Russia, the United States, and NATO allies, prompting them to adjust their Arctic capabilities in response.

Following the attacks on Olenya airfield and Murmansk region, the Arctic region is experiencing shockwaves of the conflict in Ukraine. The proximate presence of nuclear-powered submarines, oil and gas terminals, and newly emerged NSR, aggrandise Moscow’s strategic anxieties about its ambitious Arctic agenda.  As an impregnable power in the High North, multidomain awareness is crucial for Russia to sustain its military stature which makes unmanned agents an attractive avenue to maintain polar drone superiority in the Arctic.

Shaheer Ahmad is a Research Assistant at the Centre for Aerospace and Security Studies, Islamabad. He can be reached at [email protected]


Share this article

Facebook
Twitter
LinkedIn

Recent Publications

Browse through the list of recent publications.

The US-Israel War on Iran: Objectives, Strategy, and Escalation Management

Zahra Niazi
‘States tend to overestimate themselves or the benefits and swiftness of war, and to underestimate their opponents’ capabilities, intentions, or the costs and duration of war.’ If anything, the 2026 war initiated by the United States and Israel against Iran shall be remembered in the annals of warfare among the most visible manifestations of this dynamic.
The war, immediately preceded by the January mass protests in Iran, did not represent a sudden rupture but rather the continuation of a 47-year-long confrontation and a more intense phase of the June 2025 war.
The US Secretary of War, Pete Hegseth, defined the war’s objectives as being laser-focused: to destroy Iran’s missile capabilities and its security infrastructure, while ensuring that it could never develop nuclear weapons. Beyond these stated objectives, among the priorities on the continuum also lay the objective of regime change, with both President Trump and Prime Minister Netanyahu explicitly calling on the Iranian population to take over the government at the outset of the war.

Read More »

Marka-e-Haq to the Peace Talks: Pakistan’s Middle Power Status

On 7th May 2025, Pakistan’s military forces took the international security community by surprise when it demonstrated operational superiority against its larger belligerent adversary India with its rapid and coordinated response. The Four-Day conflict proved to be a watershed moment for Pakistan, marking its rapid emergence as an important player in the region. In recent years, amidst the ongoing global competition between the United States and China, Islamabad has adopted a position of ’Strategic Balancing,’ where it maintains ties of cooperation with both Beijing and Washington. Deft diplomacy, emphasis on geo-economics, and credible conventional and strategic deterrence have remained the foundational pillars for Pakistan’s ambition as a rising middle power

Read More »

Debunking the S-400 Shield: Lessons from the India-Pakistan Conflict

Air defense has always been a central aspect of warfare. In South Asia, the phenomenon carries immense significance due to compressed reaction times. In this context, one of the most-hyped systems is the Russian-made S-400, touted by New Delhi as a one-stop solution to counter aerial threats from both Pakistan and China.
The 2025 conflict between India and Pakistan marked an important chapter in testing the S-400 technology. The conflict began on May 7, when India attacked what it alleged were terrorist targets in both Pakistani-held Kashmir and Pakistan proper, using drone and missile strikes. The conflict lasted for four days, culminating in a U.S-facilitated ceasefire. However, the brief conflict debunked a lot of the myths regarding the S-400 technology.
First, India claimed that the mobile S-400 would be able to control Pakistan’s airspace. In contrast, Pakistani aircraft continued to operate freely, according to official briefings by the Pakistani military. Although the Pakistan Air Force (PAF) aircraft were in their own airspace, they were still within the air defense range.

Read More »