The Long March- Dr Usman - Article thematic Image - Nov copy

The world is beset by a deep, frightening, and wide-ranging economic malaise, which is likely to morph into an officially-declared global recession in 2023. The recession is arguably unofficially here already, with the major economies of the world, including the US, Europe, and China; all facing acute recessionary pressures that are driven by both local and global conditions. In Europe, for example, it is the looming gas input costs over the winter, and the threat of a new wave of destitute Ukrainian war-refugees, that is weighing down on local growth. In China, it is the extended Covid lockdowns that are stunting economic potential, along with weaknesses in its real estate sector that risk erupting into wider contagion. In the US, it is the thorough mismanagement of monetary policy by the central bank (Fed) which has collapsed not just domestic asset classes such as equities, but also sunk most of the world’s currencies.

The broader risks are in fact threefold: on the one hand, slowing economic activity is causing a widespread recession in employment and investment; on the other hand, supply shocks and politicized economics (sanctions, cartels) are leading to widespread inflation; and on yet another hand, countries are saddled with unprecedented amounts of debt, making their fiscal positions untenable if a long-lasting recession unfolds. There are at least two more factors which will strain the global economy which are only beginning to receive the requisite attention: climate change (as the floods in Pakistan sadly illustrated), and overpopulation in the Third World where resources face imminent depletion.

With these daunting challenges in mind, the most salutary path forward for the global economy, and for international peace, would lie in concerted and committed international cooperation among the brotherhood of nations, both on the urgent (inflation, recession) and on the important (climate change, overpopulation). To borrow a local buzzword, mankind requires a long march towards common progress premised on shared aspirations. Such collective effort has been appealed for by leading figures including UN Secretary General Antonio Guterres, who was deeply moved by the plight of the flood-victims in Pakistan upon his recent visit.

Yet in the absence of global unity towards tackling the wicked problems that beset us, it is necessary for Pakistan’s leadership to operate and act as one mind, setting aside the differences that have boiled over into an acrimony that distracts 22 crores on a daily basis. Such distraction dissipates the nation’s energy and weakens its potency across all fronts, leading to a short-termism in approaches that is ill-suited to the economic tempest that the world is coming to confront. The world’s economic malaise calls for a long march of stoic resolve, in what may be at least a decade of hardship. With this in mind, there is a pressing need for concentration on the bigger problems that grip the world, so that we are prepared for the economic challenge ahead.

I consider this to be the “longer march” of our nation through a difficult period of international tumult. One needn’t look far for examples of countries that have already begun to falter as the times change: Sri Lanka is but one cautionary tale, Lebanon another, and the list will sadly grow. The road ahead will not be easy and may require tough measures that require a patient public that bears the brunt with equanimity. A leadership that enjoys public trust will be the only way that such patience will be foreborne, and so it behooves the nation at large as well as its nomenklatura to sit together and act in the larger national interest, which must be determined through consensus and confidence-building.

In other words, there is a “longer march” that the country must undertake, with all citizens finding common purpose in the nation’s betterment, proceeding resolutely through the tumult of the recession ahead, and rising above that tempestuous phase towards building the edifice of a better society.

Dr. Usman W. Chohan is the Director for Economic Affairs and National Development at the Centre for Aerospace & Security Studies (CASS), Islamabad, Pakistan. The article was first published in Daily Iqtida. He can be reached at [email protected].


Share this article

Facebook
Twitter
LinkedIn

Recent Publications

Browse through the list of recent publications.

The Cover-up: IAF Narrative of the May 2025 Air Battle

Even after one year since the India-Pakistan May war of 2025, the Indian discourse regarding Operation Sindoor remains uncertain under its pretence of restraint. The Pahalgam attack on 22 April, which killed 26 people, triggered an escalatory spiral. New Delhi quickly accused Pakistan-linked elements, while Islamabad refuted the allegation and demanded an independent investigation. On 7 May, India launched attacks deep inside Pakistan under what it later termed as Operation Sindoor. The political motive was intended to turn the crisis into coercive signalling by shifting the blame onto the enemy and projecting a sense of military superiority.
This episode, however, began to fray immediately as war seldom follows the intended script. Within minutes PAF shot down 7 IAF aircraft including 4 Rafales. On 8 May, Reuters reported that at least two Indian aircraft were shot down by a Pakistani J-10C, while the local government sources reported other aircraft crashes in Indian-occupied Jammu and Kashmir

Read More »

Why the IAF’s Post-Sindoor Spending Surge is a Sign of Panic

After Operation Sindoor, India is spending billions of dollars on new weapons. This is being taken by many people as an indication of military prowess. It is not. This rush to procure weapons is in fact an acknowledgement that the Air Force in India had failed to do what it was meant to do. The costly jets and missiles that India had purchased over the years failed to yield the promised results.

Sindoor was soon followed by India in sealing the gaps which the operation had exposed. It was reported that Indian Air Force (IAF) is looking to speed up its purchases of more than 7 billion USD. This will involve other Rafale fighter jets with India already ordering 26 more Rafales to the Navy in 2024 at an estimated cost of about 3.9 billion USD. India is also seeking long-range standoff missiles, Israeli loitering munitions and increased drone capabilities. Special financial powers of the Indian military were activated to issue emergency procurement orders. The magnitude and rate of these purchases speak volumes.

Indian media and defence analysts have over the years considered the Rafale as a game changer. When India purchased 36 Rafales aircrafts at an approximate cost of 8.7 billion USD, analysts vowed that the aircraft would provide India with air superiority over Pakistan. Operation Sindoor disproved all those allegations. Indian aircraft did not even fly in Pakistani airspace when the fighting started. India solely depended on standoff weapons that were launched at a safe distance. The air defence system of Pakistan, comprising of the HQ-9 surface-to-air missile system and its own fighters, stood its ground.

Read More »

May 2025: Mosaic Warfare and the Myth of Centralised Air Power

Visualise a modern-day Air Force commander sitting in the operations room, miles away from the combat zone, overseeing every friendly and enemy aircraft and all assets involved in the campaign. In a split second, he can task a fighter, reposition a drone, and authorise a strike. In today’s promising technological era, he does not even need an operations room; a laptop on his desktop will suffice. The situation looks promising as it offers efficiency, precision, and control. The term used for such operational control is ‘centralisation’, which has been made possible with advanced networking, integrating space, cyber, surveillance, artificial intelligence, and seamless communication, enabling a single commander to manage an entire campaign from a single node. Centralised command and control, championed by the Western air forces and then adopted by many others, has thus been seen as a pinnacle of modern military power.
The concept of centralisation, enabled by state-of-the-art networking, may seem promising, but it is nothing more than a myth.

Read More »