Shaheer Ahmad-Sem-Rac-Pak-Oped thumbnail-July-2024- AP (1)

In the escalating theatre of great power competition, semiconductors have emerged as indispensable actors. These tiny components, often smaller than a fingernail, are the backbone of a wide array of applications, from communications and aerospace to automobiles and advanced weapon systems. Their omnipresence underscores their role as catalysts of technological and economic advancement, positioning them at the core of contemporary national security strategies and policy calculus.

Amidst the COVID-19 Pandemic, the global supply chain of semiconductors faced widespread disruptions, affecting 169 sectors, which resulted in price hikes and deferred orders. It was this fear of supply chain disturbance and the subsequent geopolitical tussle, specifically between the United States (US) and China, that brought semiconductors into the global spotlight. Governments are realising the significance of semiconductors as a bargaining chip and source of competitive edge in the global technological landscape. Now more than ever, emerging economies are determined to reduce their external dependency and achieve self-sufficiency in developing and manufacturing semiconductors.

China, the world’s largest consumer of semiconductors, is pushing to challenge the US’ stature as a leading technological hub. Through initiatives like ‘Made in China,’ it aims to reduce its external dependence by enhancing its domestic semiconductor production. It has taken a bold step to enhance semiconductor manufacturing capabilities by pumping USD 47.5 billion into its ‘National Integrated Circuit Industry Fund’. The investment is distributed along the targeted areas of semiconductor production and advanced manufacturing capabilities. This directed effort will help China establish a thriving ecosystem, which will strengthen indigenous production capacity and overcome global supply challenges.

Conversely, the US, which has also realised its susceptibility to global supply chain disruption, is pursuing a de-risking approach to maintain its technological resilience. Despite its prominence in R&D, the US faces formidable challenges in semiconductor manufacturing. In this regard, it is playing out the ‘CHIPS Act’ to tighten export controls on cutting-edge technologies and hinder China’s military modernisation. It has also been working with East Asian actors, including Taiwan, South Korea, and Japan, under the ‘Chip 4’ alliance. Moreover, in 2023, the US inked partnership plans with India on semiconductor supply chain resiliency and diversification, with the Micron company pledging USD 2.75 billion to establish a semiconductor facility in the country. Incidentally, both states are already engaged in the ‘initiative on Critical and Emerging Technology’ (iCET) since 2022.

This global technological bifurcation and growing Indo-US cooperation has formidable security implications for Pakistan. At the moment, domestic semiconductor industry remains underdeveloped due to economic uncertainty, lack of digital infrastructure and slow policy implementation. While a comprehensive ‘National Semiconductor Plan’, put together by  industry experts and academia in 2022, exists on paper, it was only recently that the government indicated interest in developing a semiconductor/chip design industry. The latter would need an estimated investment of USD 6-7 billion as well as skilled human resources. Global technological tensions, bloc politics and slogans of ‘chip nationalism’ are also likely to make this a difficult journey for Pakistan.

Difficult but not impossible! After all, Pakistan was the first country in Asia to produce the base material for semiconductors and has the potential to generate USD 4 billion annually in this market. According to one industry expert, what the country needs is a ‘fast-track approach’. For one thing, Pakistan must diversify its strategic partnerships with countries like China, Japan, the Netherlands and South Korea who are leading the board in this domain as well as partnerships with private corporations like Intel, Nvidia and Huawai etc. While semiconductor development requires significant financial resources, Pakistan could also consider focusing on the  less expensive testing and packaging phases. These steps could enable development of a nascent industrial base.

Semiconductors are the new battleground in the global power landscape, where India in South Asia, helped by the US, is aggressively pursuing a position as a formidable player in this critical technology. India’s advancements could serve as a foundation for more assertive posturing, posing potential threats to Pakistan’s national security and technological sovereignty. In response, Pakistan ought to strive toward establishing a foothold in the semiconductor market. Maintaining technological parity and safeguarding national security will be crucial as the region confronts this new era of technological competition.

Shaheer Ahmad is a Research Assistant at the Centre for Aerospace & Security Studies (CASS), Islamabad, Pakistan. He can be reached at [email protected]


Share this article

Facebook
Twitter
LinkedIn

Recent Publications

Browse through the list of recent publications.

The Cover-up: IAF Narrative of the May 2025 Air Battle

Even after one year since the India-Pakistan May war of 2025, the Indian discourse regarding Operation Sindoor remains uncertain under its pretence of restraint. The Pahalgam attack on 22 April, which killed 26 people, triggered an escalatory spiral. New Delhi quickly accused Pakistan-linked elements, while Islamabad refuted the allegation and demanded an independent investigation. On 7 May, India launched attacks deep inside Pakistan under what it later termed as Operation Sindoor. The political motive was intended to turn the crisis into coercive signalling by shifting the blame onto the enemy and projecting a sense of military superiority.
This episode, however, began to fray immediately as war seldom follows the intended script. Within minutes PAF shot down 7 IAF aircraft including 4 Rafales. On 8 May, Reuters reported that at least two Indian aircraft were shot down by a Pakistani J-10C, while the local government sources reported other aircraft crashes in Indian-occupied Jammu and Kashmir

Read More »

Why the IAF’s Post-Sindoor Spending Surge is a Sign of Panic

After Operation Sindoor, India is spending billions of dollars on new weapons. This is being taken by many people as an indication of military prowess. It is not. This rush to procure weapons is in fact an acknowledgement that the Air Force in India had failed to do what it was meant to do. The costly jets and missiles that India had purchased over the years failed to yield the promised results.

Sindoor was soon followed by India in sealing the gaps which the operation had exposed. It was reported that Indian Air Force (IAF) is looking to speed up its purchases of more than 7 billion USD. This will involve other Rafale fighter jets with India already ordering 26 more Rafales to the Navy in 2024 at an estimated cost of about 3.9 billion USD. India is also seeking long-range standoff missiles, Israeli loitering munitions and increased drone capabilities. Special financial powers of the Indian military were activated to issue emergency procurement orders. The magnitude and rate of these purchases speak volumes.

Indian media and defence analysts have over the years considered the Rafale as a game changer. When India purchased 36 Rafales aircrafts at an approximate cost of 8.7 billion USD, analysts vowed that the aircraft would provide India with air superiority over Pakistan. Operation Sindoor disproved all those allegations. Indian aircraft did not even fly in Pakistani airspace when the fighting started. India solely depended on standoff weapons that were launched at a safe distance. The air defence system of Pakistan, comprising of the HQ-9 surface-to-air missile system and its own fighters, stood its ground.

Read More »

May 2025: Mosaic Warfare and the Myth of Centralised Air Power

Visualise a modern-day Air Force commander sitting in the operations room, miles away from the combat zone, overseeing every friendly and enemy aircraft and all assets involved in the campaign. In a split second, he can task a fighter, reposition a drone, and authorise a strike. In today’s promising technological era, he does not even need an operations room; a laptop on his desktop will suffice. The situation looks promising as it offers efficiency, precision, and control. The term used for such operational control is ‘centralisation’, which has been made possible with advanced networking, integrating space, cyber, surveillance, artificial intelligence, and seamless communication, enabling a single commander to manage an entire campaign from a single node. Centralised command and control, championed by the Western air forces and then adopted by many others, has thus been seen as a pinnacle of modern military power.
The concept of centralisation, enabled by state-of-the-art networking, may seem promising, but it is nothing more than a myth.

Read More »