Ajwa Hijazi-Gaza-Grave-MDS

In response to Hamas’s attack on 7th October, 2023, Israel has unleashed a fatal onslaught on the Gaza Strip. In these brutal attacks, Israel is not even sparing innocent children and infants. According to Save the Children, in the last 100 days or so, more than 10,000 children have been killed due to Israeli airstrikes and ground operations. The number of children killed by Israel in merely the first three weeks crossed the ‘annual global death toll of children killed in conflict zones in 2019’. Thousands of children have been missing under the rubble of the destroyed buildings. The past few months have brought forth a bone-chilling reality that children in Gaza are unsafe even in hospitals, safe zones, shelters, etc.; as Israeli airstrikes have bombarded these facilities, too. Owing to Israel’s murderous spree against children, the Executive Director of the United Nations Children’s Fund (UNICEF) stated that Gaza had become the ‘most dangerous place in the world to be alive as a child,’ and the United Nations termed it ‘the graveyard for children’.

UNICEF has stated that the children of Gaza are facing a ‘triple threat’ – Conflict, Malnutrition, and Disease. The children who are somehow miraculously surviving the aerial strikes or gunshots are suffering from inhumane conditions due to a lack of medical facilities and humanitarian aid. There has been a record increase of diarrhea cases among children (under the age of 5) from 48,000 to 71,000 cases in a week (starting 17th December). Regarding nutrition needs, 90% of children under the age of 2 only consume two or fewer food groups, which is detrimental to their health. These glaring figures indicate the horrendous living conditions that have encapsulated the lives of innocent children sitting on the brink of death 24/7.

The cycle of life does not stop in any situation. In the past (approximately) 100 days of Israel’s genocidal assault on Gaza, Palestinian mothers have given birth to 20,000 babies. Unfortunately, these babies face risk to their lives due to several factors. Owing to internal displacement, newborns are kept in cold tents – many unwashed for even a month due to scarcity of water. Moreover, mothers are unable to breastfeed their infants due to a lack of nutrition intake.

Another distressing aspect is the lasting impact of this situation on the mental health of the children growing up in Gaza. Children are showing signs of Post-Traumatic Stress Disorder (PTSD) after losing their parents and family members and also because of being buried alive under the rubble of bombarded buildings for days.

According to Ka Lok Yip, Assistant Professor of Law at Hamad bin Khalifa University, ‘The main source of protection for children in the armed conflict is derived from their status as ‘civilians,’ assuming that they are not taking part in the hostilities’. However, Israel has violated several articles and protocols of the Geneva Convention that protect children during war. In its apparent quest to eliminate Palestinians from Gaza, it is blatantly targeting children, the most vulnerable members of society.

The ongoing bombardment impacting civilians, including the deeply shocking casualties among children, has led to a relatively firmer stance from the West towards Netanyahu, yet the response remains measured despite the gravity of the situation. In fact, in some Western capitals, the word ‘ceasefire’ (comprehensive and long-term suspension of fighting) largely remains taboo, and instead many Western leaders are merely urging Israel for a ‘humanitarian pause’ (a temporary cessation of hostilities).

In the same vein, text of the recent verdict of the International Court of Justice (ICJ) on the ‘Application of the Convention on the Prevention and Punishment of the Crime of Genocide in the Gaza Strip (South Africa v. Israel)’ did not contain the word ‘ceasefire.’ However, ICJ found it ‘plausible’ that Israel is violating the Genocide Convention, and 15 out of 17 judges on the panel only ordered Israel to take emergency measures to stop the act of genocide. While this decision offers a momentary sigh of relief amid the prevailing situation, the likelihood of Israel adhering to it seems grim, considering its persistent rogue behaviour.

Israel’s war hysteria in Gaza is getting out of bounds. The horrifying imagery of dead and injured children, amidst widespread human devastation, should shake our collective human conscience to the core. It is tragic that in the 21st Century, the world is a witness to destruction of such magnitude unfolding in Gaza. The uninterrupted flow of humanitarian aid is vital for meeting the urgent needs of the Palestinian people and their children. As John Donne famously wrote, ‘No man is an island,’ reminding us of our shared humanity and responsibility. To truly safeguard their future, the world must unite with a singular focus: pressuring Israel to declare an immediate ceasefire in Gaza. Failure to do so risks history casting a severe judgment on all who played a role in extending the suffering of Gazans.

Ajwa Hijazi is a Research Assistant at the Centre for Aerospace & Security Studies (CASS), Islamabad, Pakistan. The article was first published in The News International. She can be reached at [email protected].

Design Credit:  Mysha Dua Salman


Share this article

Facebook
Twitter
LinkedIn

Recent Publications

Browse through the list of recent publications.

The Cover-up: IAF Narrative of the May 2025 Air Battle

Even after one year since the India-Pakistan May war of 2025, the Indian discourse regarding Operation Sindoor remains uncertain under its pretence of restraint. The Pahalgam attack on 22 April, which killed 26 people, triggered an escalatory spiral. New Delhi quickly accused Pakistan-linked elements, while Islamabad refuted the allegation and demanded an independent investigation. On 7 May, India launched attacks deep inside Pakistan under what it later termed as Operation Sindoor. The political motive was intended to turn the crisis into coercive signalling by shifting the blame onto the enemy and projecting a sense of military superiority.
This episode, however, began to fray immediately as war seldom follows the intended script. Within minutes PAF shot down 7 IAF aircraft including 4 Rafales. On 8 May, Reuters reported that at least two Indian aircraft were shot down by a Pakistani J-10C, while the local government sources reported other aircraft crashes in Indian-occupied Jammu and Kashmir

Read More »

Why the IAF’s Post-Sindoor Spending Surge is a Sign of Panic

After Operation Sindoor, India is spending billions of dollars on new weapons. This is being taken by many people as an indication of military prowess. It is not. This rush to procure weapons is in fact an acknowledgement that the Air Force in India had failed to do what it was meant to do. The costly jets and missiles that India had purchased over the years failed to yield the promised results.

Sindoor was soon followed by India in sealing the gaps which the operation had exposed. It was reported that Indian Air Force (IAF) is looking to speed up its purchases of more than 7 billion USD. This will involve other Rafale fighter jets with India already ordering 26 more Rafales to the Navy in 2024 at an estimated cost of about 3.9 billion USD. India is also seeking long-range standoff missiles, Israeli loitering munitions and increased drone capabilities. Special financial powers of the Indian military were activated to issue emergency procurement orders. The magnitude and rate of these purchases speak volumes.

Indian media and defence analysts have over the years considered the Rafale as a game changer. When India purchased 36 Rafales aircrafts at an approximate cost of 8.7 billion USD, analysts vowed that the aircraft would provide India with air superiority over Pakistan. Operation Sindoor disproved all those allegations. Indian aircraft did not even fly in Pakistani airspace when the fighting started. India solely depended on standoff weapons that were launched at a safe distance. The air defence system of Pakistan, comprising of the HQ-9 surface-to-air missile system and its own fighters, stood its ground.

Read More »

May 2025: Mosaic Warfare and the Myth of Centralised Air Power

Visualise a modern-day Air Force commander sitting in the operations room, miles away from the combat zone, overseeing every friendly and enemy aircraft and all assets involved in the campaign. In a split second, he can task a fighter, reposition a drone, and authorise a strike. In today’s promising technological era, he does not even need an operations room; a laptop on his desktop will suffice. The situation looks promising as it offers efficiency, precision, and control. The term used for such operational control is ‘centralisation’, which has been made possible with advanced networking, integrating space, cyber, surveillance, artificial intelligence, and seamless communication, enabling a single commander to manage an entire campaign from a single node. Centralised command and control, championed by the Western air forces and then adopted by many others, has thus been seen as a pinnacle of modern military power.
The concept of centralisation, enabled by state-of-the-art networking, may seem promising, but it is nothing more than a myth.

Read More »