Modi

The leaked WhatsApp conversation of popular Indian journalist Arnab Goswami with former Broadcast Audience Research Council (BARC) CEO Partho Dasgupta has exposed the true face and intentions of Prime Minister Narendra Modi. conversation makes it fairly evident that India state-managed the Pulwama incident on 15 February 2019 and the Balakot strikes on 26 February 2019 to secure more votes in the elections scheduled a few months later by flaring up anti-Pakistan sentiment in the Indian public.

Modi’s actions clearly indicate that he has used the “Diversionary Theory of War’’ according to which leaders tend to instigate war in order to divert the attention of the masses from internal domestic issues. It is widely known that Modi favors ultra-nationalism as a tool to revamp his political stature. Instead of showing notable progress in fundamental areas such as economy, employment, healthcare, poverty-reduction and other important issues, he tends to please the Indian public, particularly the Hindu-hardliners by taking aim at Pakistan which is generally very sellable in India.

After taking his seat as the Prime Minister, Narendra Modi manipulated the Indian media in spreading an anti-Pakistan narrative across the whole country with channels instigating hatred towards the country. Pakistan’s Prime Minister, Imran Khan has rightly pointed out that the leaked conversation has revealed an unholy nexus between the Modi government and Indian media. The content of the conversation implies that Goswami knew about the government decisions well ahead of time which suggests that both Balakot and Pulwama were pre-planned and state- managed.

The most appalling aspect of the text exchange was the joy expressed by the Indian journalist over spiking Television Rating Points (TRPs) due to the death of Indian soldiers, which indicates that human lives, even those of their own soldiers have no value in Indian politics.

Another aspect which needs due attention is that Prime Minister Modi did not hesitate to politicize the Armed Forces by getting them involved for his own vested interests and used them in a way that could have borne disastrous results. This, in itself is a stark reflection of his personality and lack of a moral compass.

On the one hand, Indian leadership accuses Pakistan of sponsoring terrorism in India without any concrete proof, while itself masterminding activities that are threatening regional stability and undermining bilateral relations.

Analyzing all aspects of this recent episode, it becomes evident that India is not interested in fostering durable peace in the region. This dangerous style of leadership will have grave implications not only for South Asia, but also India itself. Modi’s actions will ensure that South Asia remains in a perpetual state of conflict. This perilous military adventurism can result in major conflict between the two nuclear-armed countries making the region even more prone to instability. The world must understand that these actions will not only impact India and Pakistan, but also the world at large. Shouldn’t something be done before it is too late?

Another area which requires due attention is that by spreading hatred against Pakistan, Indian leadership is corrupting the minds of Indian youth which will further strain an already-tense relationship between both countries for years to come.

For Pakistan, this development is neither new nor surprising, rather it is a reaffirmation that current Prime Minister of India is willing to disregard regional peace for personal glorification. Throughout his election campaigns in 2014 and 2019, and to date, Modi’s hostility towards Pakistan and his keenness to take reckless actions remains unchanged, and if anything has become far worse.

While the world has witnessed that Pakistan was able to avoid major escalation due to its calculated and responsible response, it should draw important lessons from Modi’s recklessness.

The Pulwama crises may not be the last of its kind rather the Modi regime will always remain active in this regard. More incidents of the same magnitude could be staged again for his personal aggrandizement.

Pakistan should maintain its preparedness in all domains to counter any aggression from the Indian side, while at the same time, remaining pro-active in pursuing diplomatic measures. It needs to highlight that India is acting irresponsibly, and more aggressive actions are expected noting the hawkish actions of the country’s leadership.

Consequently Pakistan should effectively highlight Modi’s heretical leadership style and create more awareness about the severe implications of his actions.

This leaked conversation reaffirms Pakistan’s stance on Indian aggressiveness and also serves as a good example to highlight India’s role as a regional bully under Prime Minister Modi.

Shaza Arif is a Researcher at the Centre for Aerospace & Security Studies (CASS). She can be reached at [email protected]


Share this article

Facebook
Twitter
LinkedIn

Recent Publications

Browse through the list of recent publications.

The Cover-up: IAF Narrative of the May 2025 Air Battle

Even after one year since the India-Pakistan May war of 2025, the Indian discourse regarding Operation Sindoor remains uncertain under its pretence of restraint. The Pahalgam attack on 22 April, which killed 26 people, triggered an escalatory spiral. New Delhi quickly accused Pakistan-linked elements, while Islamabad refuted the allegation and demanded an independent investigation. On 7 May, India launched attacks deep inside Pakistan under what it later termed as Operation Sindoor. The political motive was intended to turn the crisis into coercive signalling by shifting the blame onto the enemy and projecting a sense of military superiority.
This episode, however, began to fray immediately as war seldom follows the intended script. Within minutes PAF shot down 7 IAF aircraft including 4 Rafales. On 8 May, Reuters reported that at least two Indian aircraft were shot down by a Pakistani J-10C, while the local government sources reported other aircraft crashes in Indian-occupied Jammu and Kashmir

Read More »

Why the IAF’s Post-Sindoor Spending Surge is a Sign of Panic

After Operation Sindoor, India is spending billions of dollars on new weapons. This is being taken by many people as an indication of military prowess. It is not. This rush to procure weapons is in fact an acknowledgement that the Air Force in India had failed to do what it was meant to do. The costly jets and missiles that India had purchased over the years failed to yield the promised results.

Sindoor was soon followed by India in sealing the gaps which the operation had exposed. It was reported that Indian Air Force (IAF) is looking to speed up its purchases of more than 7 billion USD. This will involve other Rafale fighter jets with India already ordering 26 more Rafales to the Navy in 2024 at an estimated cost of about 3.9 billion USD. India is also seeking long-range standoff missiles, Israeli loitering munitions and increased drone capabilities. Special financial powers of the Indian military were activated to issue emergency procurement orders. The magnitude and rate of these purchases speak volumes.

Indian media and defence analysts have over the years considered the Rafale as a game changer. When India purchased 36 Rafales aircrafts at an approximate cost of 8.7 billion USD, analysts vowed that the aircraft would provide India with air superiority over Pakistan. Operation Sindoor disproved all those allegations. Indian aircraft did not even fly in Pakistani airspace when the fighting started. India solely depended on standoff weapons that were launched at a safe distance. The air defence system of Pakistan, comprising of the HQ-9 surface-to-air missile system and its own fighters, stood its ground.

Read More »

May 2025: Mosaic Warfare and the Myth of Centralised Air Power

Visualise a modern-day Air Force commander sitting in the operations room, miles away from the combat zone, overseeing every friendly and enemy aircraft and all assets involved in the campaign. In a split second, he can task a fighter, reposition a drone, and authorise a strike. In today’s promising technological era, he does not even need an operations room; a laptop on his desktop will suffice. The situation looks promising as it offers efficiency, precision, and control. The term used for such operational control is ‘centralisation’, which has been made possible with advanced networking, integrating space, cyber, surveillance, artificial intelligence, and seamless communication, enabling a single commander to manage an entire campaign from a single node. Centralised command and control, championed by the Western air forces and then adopted by many others, has thus been seen as a pinnacle of modern military power.
The concept of centralisation, enabled by state-of-the-art networking, may seem promising, but it is nothing more than a myth.

Read More »