Inclusivity at the Ballot Box-Zainab-MDS

The representation of women in democratic processes is a fundamental aspect of equitable governance and political empowerment. Historically, women’s participation in politics has remained constrained, with their voices marginalised and their voting rights often denied. However, over the past century, there has been significant progress in achieving greater representation for women in the voting booth. This article explores the significance of women’s political participation, the progress made in securing their voting rights, and the continued need for efforts aimed at enhancing their representation in democratic systems, with a targeted focus on Pakistan.

Women’s participation in the political process is not merely a matter of numerical representation, it is a critical factor in the vitality and legitimacy of democratic systems. When women are actively engaged in voting and political activities, they bring diverse perspectives, priorities, and experiences to the forefront of public discourse. This diversity enriches political decision-making, leading to more comprehensive and equitable policies that address the needs and concerns of all citizens. 

Pursuant to the Global Gender Gap Index 2023, Pakistan is ranked 142nd out of 146 countries in terms of gender equality. In Pakistan, there is a notably large gender gap in political involvement, which is acknowledged as a crucial element of gender equality. Given the vitality of women’s participation in the political process, it is alarming that it is still compromised in our country despite the fact that the female population is almost equal to the male population

Several powerful long-term forces embedded in the Pakistani social fabric are unfavourable to female electoral participation. The most prominent ones are illiteracy, limited political awareness, and socio-cultural norms and practices. A USIP survey conducted in Lahore, found that men continue to play a decisive role in buffering women’s access to the voting booth, their individual opinions and adherence to societal standards are significant determinants for women’s turnout in major cities. The results indicated that ‘8.3% of men believe it is inappropriate for women to cast a ballot in a general election and 55% of men believe it is right to bar women in their household from casting a ballot if they vote differently.’ Secondly, the lack of political awareness of women is intertwined with diminished levels of political interest. Women are more willing to vote when they are educated about the political processes in general and the voting process in particular. 

However, data recently released by the Election Commission of Pakistan has offered a silver lining as the number of registered women voters has grown from 47 million in 2018 to a remarkable 58 million as of July 25, 2023. The addition of 11.7 million more women’s names to the voter list marks an important breakthrough toward reducing the pervasive gender disparity in voter registration.

Despite the notable progress made, challenges persist in achieving full and equitable representation of women voters. Women, continue to face barriers such as voter suppression, and systemic inequalities that affect their access to the ballot box. Literacy is a key element in increasing female electoral participation and their overall engagement in the political process as this can help them make more informed voting decisions. As per the data of 2022, female literacy in Pakistan stands at 48% and hence necessitates serious improvement. 

The government should develop voter education programmes that explain the voting process, candidates’ positions, and the importance of women’s participation in elections. Research analysing a ‘nonpartisan voter education campaign run by two Civil Society Organisations (Aurat-Foundation and SAP-PK) in Lahore before the 2018 elections’ revealed 8% enhanced women turnout.

Moreover, a higher percentage of women in Pakistan’s parliament is essential for achieving gender equality, advancing women’s rights, and improving overall governance. It enriches the legislative process, enhances policy outcomes, and would serve as a beacon of progress toward a more inclusive and equitable society. For instance, Rwanda is often cited as a global leader in women’s political representation. The country’s constitution directs that at least ‘30% of parliamentary seats be reserved for women.’ On ground, this has resulted in women holding ‘more than 60% of the seats in the Rwandan Parliament,’ making it one of the highest female representation in any legislature worldwide. Pakistan ranks 111th in the world in terms of the proportion of women in Parliament as per the data of the Inter-Parliamentary Union.

Conclusively, endeavours to increase women’s participation in voting is not just a pursuit of gender equality, it is an investment in the very essence of democracy. By breaking down barriers that have historically limited women’s political engagement, it is possible to unlock the potential for more inclusive, representative, and responsive governance.

Zainab Iftikhar is a Research Assistant at the Centre for Aerospace and Security Studies (CASS), Islamabad, Pakistan. She can be reached at [email protected]

Design Credit: Mysha Dua Salman 


Share this article

Facebook
Twitter
LinkedIn

Recent Publications

Browse through the list of recent publications.

The Cover-up: IAF Narrative of the May 2025 Air Battle

Even after one year since the India-Pakistan May war of 2025, the Indian discourse regarding Operation Sindoor remains uncertain under its pretence of restraint. The Pahalgam attack on 22 April, which killed 26 people, triggered an escalatory spiral. New Delhi quickly accused Pakistan-linked elements, while Islamabad refuted the allegation and demanded an independent investigation. On 7 May, India launched attacks deep inside Pakistan under what it later termed as Operation Sindoor. The political motive was intended to turn the crisis into coercive signalling by shifting the blame onto the enemy and projecting a sense of military superiority.
This episode, however, began to fray immediately as war seldom follows the intended script. Within minutes PAF shot down 7 IAF aircraft including 4 Rafales. On 8 May, Reuters reported that at least two Indian aircraft were shot down by a Pakistani J-10C, while the local government sources reported other aircraft crashes in Indian-occupied Jammu and Kashmir

Read More »

Why the IAF’s Post-Sindoor Spending Surge is a Sign of Panic

After Operation Sindoor, India is spending billions of dollars on new weapons. This is being taken by many people as an indication of military prowess. It is not. This rush to procure weapons is in fact an acknowledgement that the Air Force in India had failed to do what it was meant to do. The costly jets and missiles that India had purchased over the years failed to yield the promised results.

Sindoor was soon followed by India in sealing the gaps which the operation had exposed. It was reported that Indian Air Force (IAF) is looking to speed up its purchases of more than 7 billion USD. This will involve other Rafale fighter jets with India already ordering 26 more Rafales to the Navy in 2024 at an estimated cost of about 3.9 billion USD. India is also seeking long-range standoff missiles, Israeli loitering munitions and increased drone capabilities. Special financial powers of the Indian military were activated to issue emergency procurement orders. The magnitude and rate of these purchases speak volumes.

Indian media and defence analysts have over the years considered the Rafale as a game changer. When India purchased 36 Rafales aircrafts at an approximate cost of 8.7 billion USD, analysts vowed that the aircraft would provide India with air superiority over Pakistan. Operation Sindoor disproved all those allegations. Indian aircraft did not even fly in Pakistani airspace when the fighting started. India solely depended on standoff weapons that were launched at a safe distance. The air defence system of Pakistan, comprising of the HQ-9 surface-to-air missile system and its own fighters, stood its ground.

Read More »

May 2025: Mosaic Warfare and the Myth of Centralised Air Power

Visualise a modern-day Air Force commander sitting in the operations room, miles away from the combat zone, overseeing every friendly and enemy aircraft and all assets involved in the campaign. In a split second, he can task a fighter, reposition a drone, and authorise a strike. In today’s promising technological era, he does not even need an operations room; a laptop on his desktop will suffice. The situation looks promising as it offers efficiency, precision, and control. The term used for such operational control is ‘centralisation’, which has been made possible with advanced networking, integrating space, cyber, surveillance, artificial intelligence, and seamless communication, enabling a single commander to manage an entire campaign from a single node. Centralised command and control, championed by the Western air forces and then adopted by many others, has thus been seen as a pinnacle of modern military power.
The concept of centralisation, enabled by state-of-the-art networking, may seem promising, but it is nothing more than a myth.

Read More »